As humanity prepares to send its first astronauts back to the moon by 2026, a new space race is emerging - one with significant implications for global politics, economies, and our very survival on Earth.
The renewed interest in lunar exploration is being driven by the desire to harness the moon's resources, particularly water ice deposits and solar arrays. This pursuit of "resource utilisation" has led to two camps: the US and China-Russia bloc, which are competing for control over the lunar surface under the guise of "peaceful exploration". The UN outer space treaty of 1967 prohibits state exploitation of the heavens, but a loophole regarding private claims is now being exploited by tycoon-led ventures.
The commercialisation of space is being led by the private sector, with tech moguls like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos driving this agenda. SpaceX aims to float its space exploration firm in 2026 for $1.5 trillion, while Google plans to power datacentres in orbit using solar energy. This push for off-Earth infrastructure raises concerns about the ecological limits of our planet.
A parallel to Kim Stanley Robinson's classic sci-fi novel "Red Mars" is unfolding today. The space race is being characterised as a new phase of human settlement, with nations and corporations competing to control the lunar frontier. However, this pursuit of resource utilisation subtly inverts the problem, shifting from reducing dependence on Earth to expanding our ecological footprint.
As we venture into space, it's imperative that we learn from past mistakes. The old politics that drove humanity's last commons into exploitation are being exported to new worlds with disastrous results. We must first learn to live sustainably on our own before occupying another planet. It's a warning echoed by Robinson's novel, which cautions that humanity's actions in space will have far-reaching consequences for our future.
The stakes are high, and the time for action is now. As we embark on this new journey, we must consider the long-term implications of our actions and strive for sustainable practices that benefit both our planet and future generations.
The renewed interest in lunar exploration is being driven by the desire to harness the moon's resources, particularly water ice deposits and solar arrays. This pursuit of "resource utilisation" has led to two camps: the US and China-Russia bloc, which are competing for control over the lunar surface under the guise of "peaceful exploration". The UN outer space treaty of 1967 prohibits state exploitation of the heavens, but a loophole regarding private claims is now being exploited by tycoon-led ventures.
The commercialisation of space is being led by the private sector, with tech moguls like Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos driving this agenda. SpaceX aims to float its space exploration firm in 2026 for $1.5 trillion, while Google plans to power datacentres in orbit using solar energy. This push for off-Earth infrastructure raises concerns about the ecological limits of our planet.
A parallel to Kim Stanley Robinson's classic sci-fi novel "Red Mars" is unfolding today. The space race is being characterised as a new phase of human settlement, with nations and corporations competing to control the lunar frontier. However, this pursuit of resource utilisation subtly inverts the problem, shifting from reducing dependence on Earth to expanding our ecological footprint.
As we venture into space, it's imperative that we learn from past mistakes. The old politics that drove humanity's last commons into exploitation are being exported to new worlds with disastrous results. We must first learn to live sustainably on our own before occupying another planet. It's a warning echoed by Robinson's novel, which cautions that humanity's actions in space will have far-reaching consequences for our future.
The stakes are high, and the time for action is now. As we embark on this new journey, we must consider the long-term implications of our actions and strive for sustainable practices that benefit both our planet and future generations.