US President Donald Trump's pick for surgeon general, Casey Means, is sending shockwaves among medical experts. A wellness influencer and author, Means has a history of promoting "functional medicine," which many critics call quackery. Her methods are often based on unproven theories and pseudoscience.
One major concern is that Means dropped out of her surgical residency with just months left to complete it. She also has anti-vaccine sentiments, which could have far-reaching consequences for public health. Moreover, she advocates for using the sun to achieve optimal metabolic health β a claim that has been widely debunked by experts.
Critics argue that Means' confirmation could lead to the promotion of products and ideas that are not backed by scientific evidence. She has financial ties to supplement companies and tobacco giants, which raises questions about her potential influence on public policy.
Emily Bass, director of Federal Policy, Food and Agriculture at the Breakthrough Institute, notes that promoting a wholesale conversion to organic food could be impractical from a food supply standpoint and may not necessarily benefit the environment. Organic produce is often more expensive and labor-intensive to grow, and genetically modified crops can yield larger harvests on smaller plots of land.
Moreover, Bass points out that some pesticides used in conventional agriculture are toxic, whereas others used in organic farming are sometimes more toxic themselves. The debate around these chemicals highlights the complexity of environmental tradeoffs when it comes to food production.
As a surgeon general, Means would have significant influence over public health policy and messaging. Critics warn that her ideas could lead to misinformation about the benefits of conventional food systems, which could have far-reaching consequences for American consumers.
The nomination is likely to spark debate about the role of science in shaping public health policy. As one doctor noted, "American healthcare has many problems and weaknesses... None of those are solved by purchasing a book about energy healing or buying milkshakes made from raw milk."
One major concern is that Means dropped out of her surgical residency with just months left to complete it. She also has anti-vaccine sentiments, which could have far-reaching consequences for public health. Moreover, she advocates for using the sun to achieve optimal metabolic health β a claim that has been widely debunked by experts.
Critics argue that Means' confirmation could lead to the promotion of products and ideas that are not backed by scientific evidence. She has financial ties to supplement companies and tobacco giants, which raises questions about her potential influence on public policy.
Emily Bass, director of Federal Policy, Food and Agriculture at the Breakthrough Institute, notes that promoting a wholesale conversion to organic food could be impractical from a food supply standpoint and may not necessarily benefit the environment. Organic produce is often more expensive and labor-intensive to grow, and genetically modified crops can yield larger harvests on smaller plots of land.
Moreover, Bass points out that some pesticides used in conventional agriculture are toxic, whereas others used in organic farming are sometimes more toxic themselves. The debate around these chemicals highlights the complexity of environmental tradeoffs when it comes to food production.
As a surgeon general, Means would have significant influence over public health policy and messaging. Critics warn that her ideas could lead to misinformation about the benefits of conventional food systems, which could have far-reaching consequences for American consumers.
The nomination is likely to spark debate about the role of science in shaping public health policy. As one doctor noted, "American healthcare has many problems and weaknesses... None of those are solved by purchasing a book about energy healing or buying milkshakes made from raw milk."