U.S. Rep. Mike Quigley says he'll launch mayoral run, fix a 'city in crisis'

Quigley Launches Mayoral Bid, Vows to "Fix a City in Crisis"

U.S. Representative Mike Quigley announced Wednesday that he will run for Chicago's mayoral seat, promising to tackle the city's myriad problems head-on and make tough decisions that have been avoided by current Mayor Brandon Johnson.

Quigley, a longtime politician who has flirted with running for mayor in previous cycles, described himself as the "tough love leader" the city needs. He outlined his plan to address key issues such as closing underutilized public schools, right-sizing city government, and confronting Chicago's massive pension crisis.

The congressman emphasized the need for honest leadership, citing the problem of politicians who don't want to offend and avoid making tough choices. "For decades now, mayors have kicked the can," he said. "We sold assets, made stupid mistakes because leaders were worried about just getting elected and reelected."

Quigley vowed to demand union concessions to prevent bankruptcy at four city employee pension funds and reduce a workforce that has expanded due to pandemic relief funding. He also offered to work with community leaders and the school board to close underpopulated public schools.

The plan includes privatizing some of these schools, which Quigley believes would be more efficient and productive. "When you're talking about a high school with only 100 students, it's cheaper to have them attend private school," he said.

Quigley also acknowledged that his approach may ruffle some feathers, but emphasized the need for leadership that makes tough decisions. "This is a mayor who's frankly been afraid to lead and doesn't want to make choices," he said.

As Quigley launches his campaign, it remains to be seen how he will stack up against other potential candidates, including Illinois Secretary of State Alexi Giannoulias and retiring state Comptroller Susana Mendoza. However, Quigley is confident in his ability to win, citing his track record as a candidate who has won elections despite being outspent.

The mayor's office declined to comment on the race for now, with Johnson instead focusing on community issues.
 
I'm low-key skeptical about Mike Quigley's chances πŸ˜’. I mean, he's been in politics for ages and we've seen what that gets you - cronyism and a whole lot of gridlock 🚫. Privatizing underpopulated public schools? Come on, that's just gonna leave more kids without access to quality education πŸ‘Ž. And don't even get me started on the pension crisis... Quigley thinks he can fix it with some union concessions? Please πŸ’Έ. I'm all for tough love leadership, but this guy sounds like a typical politician who only cares about getting elected πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. We need someone with real ideas and a willingness to shake things up, not just the same old tired solutions πŸ˜’.
 
πŸ€” I gotta say, Mike Quigley seems like a straight shooter, you know? He's not afraid to ruffle some feathers and make some tough decisions. I mean, who wants to deal with all that pension stuff head-on? It takes guts, right? πŸ’ͺ The thing is, we've seen politicians back out of these kinds of commitments before. Fingers crossed Quigley can actually follow through on his promises. And privatizing underpopulated public schools? That's definitely a bold move... not sure if it'll sit well with everyone, but hey, at least he's thinking outside the box πŸ“¦.
 
πŸ€” I'm so down for a new Chicago mayor... I mean, it's been a while since we've had someone shake things up around here πŸŒ†. Quigley seems like he's got some tough love energy going on, which is just what this city needs right now πŸ’ͺ. Closing those underutilized schools and tackling the pension crisis? That's some real leadership stuff 😬. I'm all for privatizing some of those schools - it might not be my personal cup of tea, but if it makes things more efficient... πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

But what really gets me is how Quigley's calling out current Mayor Johnson for being afraid to lead πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. I mean, someone's gotta do it, and if it's not him, who will? πŸ’β€β™€οΈ Still, I'm a little skeptical about some of his plans... like, privatizing schools with only 100 students? That sounds like a recipe for disaster 🚨. Only time'll tell if Quigley's got what it takes to fix this city in crisis 😬.
 
idk why politicians keep saying they wanna fix everything but actually never do πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ... they just keep kicking can down the road and hoping nobody notices πŸ˜’. mickey quigley is like one of those guys who's gonna make a lot of noise during election season but once he gets in office, we'll see if he really follows through πŸ’Έ. i mean, privatizing schools? that sounds super sketchy πŸ€”...
 
I'm not sure if I'd want Mike Quigley as my next mayor πŸ€”. He sounds like he's just gonna make big changes without thinking about how they'll affect people. Like, privatizing schools? That doesn't seem fair to kids who don't have a choice in what school they go to. And what about all the teachers and staff who work at those schools? They're not just gonna get laid off because the city thinks it's cheaper to send them to private school 🚫.

I also feel bad for Brandon Johnson, he seems like a nice guy trying to do his best in a really tough job. Maybe Quigley can learn from him and try to be more understanding? We'll have to wait and see how things play out but I'm gonna keep an eye on this one πŸ‘€
 
Ugh, I'm low-key worried about this πŸ€• Quigley sounds like he's gonna be super tough on Chicago but also kinda ruthless? Like, privatizing schools is a whole thing and I'm not sure that's the answer πŸ’Έ He needs to figure out how to make these schools more accessible for everyone, not just those who can afford private education.
 
I'm low-key surprised Quigley's jumping into this mayoral thing πŸ€”. I mean, he's had his moments in Congress, but Chicago's a whole different beast. He's gonna have to prove himself on some major issues like the pension crisis and how to tackle it without pissing off the unions πŸ€‘. The privatization part of his plan is also a hot topic – it'll be interesting to see how that plays out with the community πŸ‘₯. Can he bring some much-needed change to the city or will he just get caught in the same old politics? Only time (and the voters) will tell β°πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€” so like mike quigley is trying to be all heroic and stuff by saying he's gonna fix chicago but have you seen his track record as a rep? πŸ™„ he's been in office since 2019 and what has he really accomplished? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

and privatizing schools? come on man that's just crazy talk 🚫 public schools are supposed to be for everyone not just the ones who can afford it πŸ’Έ

i'm all about change but we need to do it in a way that actually helps people not just some big corporation making a buck πŸ’°
 
I think Mike Quigley's plan sounds pretty solid πŸ€” but at the same time, I'm not sure if privatizing public schools is really the answer... I mean, isn't that just gonna leave even more people behind? πŸ’Έ And what about all the teachers and staff who work so hard to educate those kids? wouldn't they be the ones affected by the change? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

And don't even get me started on the pension crisis... it's like, how can we just sell assets to fix it? That sounds super reckless to me 😬. I mean, what if that just makes things worse in the long run? 🀯 We need a more solid plan than just " privatizing some schools" and "demanding concessions"... that seems too simplistic to me πŸ’­

But on the other hand... Quigley does seem like he's not afraid to take risks and make tough decisions, which is kinda refreshing? 😎 I mean, politicians don't often show that kind of bravery. And he's been in politics long enough to know how things work, so maybe that gives him an edge? πŸ€”

Ugh, I'm all over the place on this one... can't make up my mind! πŸ™„
 
I'm low-key worried about Mike Quigley's approach to fixing Chicago's problems... I mean, privatizing underpopulated public schools with only 100 students? That just seems too extreme, you know? πŸ€” It feels like he's prioritizing efficiency over community needs. Don't get me wrong, the city does need some tough love leadership, but we can't just sacrifice everything for the sake of "progress". What about the potential impact on low-income families who rely on these schools? And what's the plan to ensure that private schools are more affordable and accessible to everyone? I'm all for reforming the pension crisis and making government more efficient, but let's make sure we're not sacrificing our values in the process πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€” I'm like 90% sure that Mike Quigley is gonna make a huge difference in Chicago, but at the same time, I have this nagging feeling that his plan is gonna be super divisive and might not actually work out πŸš§πŸ’Έ. I mean, privatizing public schools? That's like, so bold, right? 😲 But on the other hand, maybe it's exactly what the city needs to shake things up. And can we really trust him not to get swayed by special interests or corporate money πŸ’ΈπŸ‘€. Ugh, my mind is all over the place 🀯!
 
I'm kinda skeptical about Quigley's plan πŸ€”. Closing underutilized public schools and privatizing them sounds like it would benefit some but hurt others πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. What about the students who rely on those schools? It's not just about numbers, you know? Plus, pension crisis is a big deal πŸ€‘. Is Quigley really willing to take on those tough decisions or is he just making promises to get elected πŸŽ‰?
 
πŸ€” I mean, Quigley sounds like he's got some legit beefs with Chicago's current system, but privatizing schools just 'cause they're underpopulated? πŸ€‘ That's a tough sell for me. What if it ends up displacing the only source of support these kids have? And what about all those teachers who care? It's gonna be an interesting ride to watch how this plays out... 🚨
 
Ugh, great, just what we need another politician making promises they'll probably break... 🀯 Quigley's got some decent ideas, I guess, but privatizing schools? That's just gonna hurt those low-income families who can't afford private school fees. And what's with his "tough love leader" act? Sounds like a total cop-out to me... he's just trying to get votes by promising to make the tough decisions that nobody wants to take. I've got my doubts about him winning, but hey, we'll see how it plays out.
 
omg u guyz!!! i no that chicago is goin thru alot right now but i think mike quigley might be da real deal πŸ€”. he sounds like a straight shooter who wont take any BS from anyone and thats exactly what chicago needs rn! privatizing schools w/ only 100 students tho? idk man, thats a lil extreme even for me πŸ˜‚. but i guess its all about makin tough decisions and stuff. fingers crossed he can make it happen tho πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm thinkin' that Mike Quigley might have a point about politicians bein' too afraid to make tough decisions πŸ€”. I mean, we've seen this kinda thing happen before and it's always frustrating. He's right, we need a leader who's not worried about gettin' reelected every 4 years but actually cares about the city's problems 😊.

But privatizin' public schools? That's a tough sell for me 🚫. I don't think it's fair to just dump kids on private schools 'cause that's cheaper. They need access to quality ed too, you know? And what about all the teachers who'd lose their jobs? Not cool πŸ‘Ž.

Still, I gotta respect Quigley's willingness to take a stand and make some real changes πŸ”₯. We'll see how this whole thing plays out, but I'm keepin' an eye on it πŸ’­.
 
πŸ€” so i'm reading about mike quigley running for chicago mayoral seat and i gotta say, i love how he's all about "tough love leadership" πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ like we need someone who can make decisions without being afraid to ruffle some feathers. privatizing public schools? yeah, it might not be the most popular idea but hey, if it means making things more efficient and productive... that's gotta count for something πŸ’‘. i just hope he can deliver on his promises and doesn't just get caught up in the politics of it all πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.
 
I'm getting so frustrated with politicians making promises they can't keep πŸ™„. Quigley sounds like just another 'tough love leader' who thinks he can fix everything without really understanding the complexities of our city's problems. I mean, privatizing schools with only 100 students? That's not a solution, that's a recipe for disaster 😩. We need leaders who are willing to listen and work with community leaders, not just swoop in and try to 'fix' things without a plan. And what about the impact on low-income families who rely on those schools? It's all about being reelected, I guess πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ.
 
This guy Quigley is crazy πŸ’₯, I mean, privatizing schools because they're underpopulated? That sounds like a recipe for disaster 🀯. He's all about "tough love" and making tough decisions, but what if that means hurting the people who need those schools the most? Poor kids from low-income families would have to compete with private schools that only accept students who can afford it... not fair πŸ˜”.

And what about the teachers and union workers? Quigley wants them to take a hit on their pensions? That's gonna make waves, for sure 🌊. I'm all for making tough choices, but you gotta do it in a way that doesn't harm people's livelihoods or well-being.

I don't know if Quigley is the right guy for the job... he seems more interested in being some kind of "tough love leader" than actually listening to people and working together to solve problems πŸ’¬. We'll have to wait and see how this all plays out πŸ‘€.
 
Back
Top