Alarm raised over Chinese CCTV cameras guarding 'symbol of democracy' Magna Carta

Security cameras guarding Britain's most revered democratic symbol, Magna Carta, are being protected by Chinese CCTV companies accused of aiding genocide and espionage.

A letter from the World Uyghur Congress (WUC) to Salisbury Cathedral, which houses one of four surviving copies of the document, has sparked concerns that Dahua Technology's cameras may be used to spy on sensitive sites. The WUC claims that Dahua's low-light surveillance cameras have been implicated in genocide and crimes against humanity.

Meanwhile, another Chinese company, Hikvision, provides security for Greece's Parthenon temple, sparking similar worries about the potential misuse of its technology. Campaigners are now calling for both companies' cameras to be removed from these sites.

Dahua Technology boasts on its website that its surveillance systems help ensure the safety of a copy of Magna Carta, sealed by King John at Runnymede in 1215. However, the WUC has labeled Dahua as complicit in "genocide or crimes against humanity" due to its involvement in facial recognition systems used to identify and persecute the Uyghur people.

The World Uyghur Congress warns that surveillance cameras made by these companies can be hacked by hostile forces, revealing sensitive information about security breaches. Oleksii Kuprienko, a Ukrainian organization representative, has shared examples of footage from surveillance cameras being accessed online during Russian missile strikes, which he claims was part of psychological warfare designed to intimidate civilians.

In response, Dahua Technology denies any involvement in targeting specific ethnic or national groups and asserts that its products adhere to the highest international standards of cybersecurity. However, it suspended shipments to Russia following the country's invasion of Ukraine.

The incidents have sparked fresh concerns about China's influence on Britain's cultural heritage sites and the role of CCTV companies in global espionage.
 
I dont no if its a good idea to use chinese cctv cameras at these historical places πŸ€”, considering all the bad things those companies have been involved in... genocide, spying etc. its like, you cant be sure they wont be using them to snoop on people or something 😬. and what if theres a hack? like, oleksii kuprienko said it happend with russian missile strikes 🚨. so yeah, maybe it would be better to use another company πŸ‘
 
man this is super concerning 🀯, can't believe our beloved Magna Carta is being protected by Chinese companies that are allegedly linked to human rights abuses 🚫. I mean think about it, these companies are basically selling security cameras to some of the most sensitive sites in Europe and potentially putting people's lives at risk πŸ’”. And what really gets me is that Dahua Technology is like "oh no we're not targeting any specific groups" but how can we trust them when they've got a history of involvement with facial recognition systems used to persecute the Uyghur people? πŸ€– it's just too much, I think we need to take a closer look at our tech suppliers and make sure we're not putting our values at risk πŸ’―.
 
I'm not sure why everyone's making a big deal about this... I mean, what's the harm in using cameras from Dahua Technology or Hikvision? They're just doing their job, right? πŸ€” The World Uyghur Congress is being super dramatic and assuming the worst-case scenario. Like, even if these companies' surveillance systems do get hacked (which, let's be real, can happen to anyone), that doesn't mean they'll be used to spy on sensitive sites or persecute ethnic groups. It just means we need better cybersecurity measures in place πŸ›‘οΈ I'm all for transparency and accountability, but let's not jump to conclusions here... πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ
 
omg u wont bliev wot happnd at salisbury cathedral!!! 🀯 they got chinese cctv cosies watchin over magna carta 4eva and its like super sus!!! πŸ˜‚ dahua tech claims its all legit but the world uyghur congress is all "nah fam, ur complicit in genocide" lol. i mean who doesnt love a good game of global espionage tho? 🀫 anyway, it just shows how china's influence is gettin real and we gotta be aware of our surroundings (and cctv cameras) πŸš¨πŸ”
 
πŸ˜• I'm really worried about this. Our beloved landmarks like Salisbury Cathedral are protected by cameras from Chinese companies that are allegedly involved in some pretty serious stuff. I mean, how can we be sure that our historical treasures aren't being used to spy on us? 🀯 It's not just about the technology itself, it's about who's behind it and what they're using it for.

I think it's high time we have a conversation about this in the UK. We need to make sure that our cultural heritage is protected from any potential misuse of surveillance cameras. I'm not saying all Chinese people or companies are bad, but some of these firms do seem to be linked to some shady stuff. πŸ’”

We should also be careful about how we're importing tech from other countries. We can't just let anyone have a backdoor into our security systems. It's time for us to think more carefully about the kind of tech we're bringing into our homes and public spaces. 🚫
 
idk why chinese cctv companies are even getting contracts for places that matter like the magna carta lol 🀯 theyre basically spying on us without our consent, and it sounds like dahua tech is enabling china's human rights abuses... what can we do to stop this? shouldnt the british gov be vetting these companies more thoroughly?
 
I'm so down with the campaigners who want those cameras outta there! I mean, if Dahua Tech is accused of helping genocide, can we really trust their tech? 😊 It's not just about the cameras themselves, it's about the potential for them to be hacked and used against us. Oleksii Kuprienko's got some solid points there. And let's not forget, these cameras are protecting a piece of British history – we should be making sure our cultural icons aren't compromised by foreign interests. I'm all for transparency and accountability when it comes to our security systems. We need to make sure we're not creating an open door for espionage or human rights abuses. It's time to think outside the box (or in this case, the camera lens) πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€” 85% of people in the UK are unaware that Chinese CCTV companies are guarding our national treasures, which is kinda concerning πŸ€•. I mean, we all know about Dahua Technology's involvement with facial recognition systems used to persecute the Uyghur people... it's like, how can we trust their cameras at Salisbury Cathedral? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Dahua claims its products are secure, but Oleksii Kuprienko has some pretty convincing examples of footage being accessed online during conflicts... I'm not buying it πŸ˜’. And let's be real, if our CCTV companies are being used for espionage, that's a major security breach 🚨.

But what really gets me is how these Chinese companies are involved in guarding our cultural heritage sites... 63% of the world's cultural heritage sites are at risk due to climate change and human activity, so shouldn't we be focusing on those threats rather than just security cameras? 🌎

Anyway, I think it's time for us to take a closer look at who's watching over our national treasures and whether they're using their tech for good or evil... πŸ”. We need more transparency in this area ASAP! πŸ’»
 
πŸ€” this is so weird, one sec I'm reading about chinese cctv companies protecting magna carta and then i remember they're like super bad for human rights 😩 how can we trust them to keep our history safe? πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™€οΈ plus, what if those cameras get hacked & sensitive info gets out... 😱 shouldn't british museums be using local security firms instead? πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸš«
 
Back
Top