Elon Musk's latest move on Twitter has sparked widespread confusion among users, with many high-profile accounts losing their coveted blue check marks despite the platform's previously announced plan to "wind down" these checks. However, instead of implementing the purge as planned, Twitter appears to have targeted a single account from a major publication that Musk dislikes.
The New York Times' main account was stripped of its blue check on Saturday morning, a move that comes after Musk tweeted "Oh ok, we'll take it off then." The billionaire's response was sparked by a meme posted by an actor who engages with Musk, which referenced the Times declining to pay for verification. This incident is just the latest in Musk's long campaign against legacy blue checks, which he claims will help reduce impersonation on the platform.
However, experts warn that this new system could actually make it easier for scammers and bots to impersonate high-profile users. By reserving verification for paid users, Twitter may not effectively tackle the issue of bot accounts on its site. The move also raises questions about fairness and equality, as only certain users are required to pay for verification.
Musk has previously argued that his changes to Twitter's verification system will "treat everyone equally," but critics argue that this is just a thinly veiled attempt to drive revenue through the paid feature of Twitter Blue. With Musk facing significant debt after buying Twitter for $44 billion, the move could be seen as a way to generate additional income.
The confusion surrounding this latest development highlights the challenges Twitter faces in navigating its new verification system while keeping its users safe from impersonation and maintaining fairness across all accounts. As the platform continues to evolve under Musk's leadership, one thing is clear: only time will tell whether this move ultimately achieves its intended goals or creates more chaos for users.
The New York Times' main account was stripped of its blue check on Saturday morning, a move that comes after Musk tweeted "Oh ok, we'll take it off then." The billionaire's response was sparked by a meme posted by an actor who engages with Musk, which referenced the Times declining to pay for verification. This incident is just the latest in Musk's long campaign against legacy blue checks, which he claims will help reduce impersonation on the platform.
However, experts warn that this new system could actually make it easier for scammers and bots to impersonate high-profile users. By reserving verification for paid users, Twitter may not effectively tackle the issue of bot accounts on its site. The move also raises questions about fairness and equality, as only certain users are required to pay for verification.
Musk has previously argued that his changes to Twitter's verification system will "treat everyone equally," but critics argue that this is just a thinly veiled attempt to drive revenue through the paid feature of Twitter Blue. With Musk facing significant debt after buying Twitter for $44 billion, the move could be seen as a way to generate additional income.
The confusion surrounding this latest development highlights the challenges Twitter faces in navigating its new verification system while keeping its users safe from impersonation and maintaining fairness across all accounts. As the platform continues to evolve under Musk's leadership, one thing is clear: only time will tell whether this move ultimately achieves its intended goals or creates more chaos for users.
. I mean, if they're supposed to be "wind down" the whole thing, why target a specific account like The New York Times? It just seems like Musk is trying to get attention and stir up drama 
. And honestly, it's hard for me to see how paying for blue checks would even help with impersonation issues... wouldn't that just create another barrier for legit users? 
I'm not a tech expert or anything, but as someone who just wants to use Twitter without worrying about fake accounts, this whole thing is super frustrating 
. Can someone explain it to me in simple terms? 
, but experts are saying that might actually make it harder to stop scammers and bots from impersonating people? 
Not cool, @elonmusk! 
. It's like, I get it, he wants to crack down on fake accounts, but come on, can't you just make a plan and stick to it? 
. It's like, I'm a journalist or an influencer, shouldn't I be able to prove who I am without having to shell out extra cash? 
It's like, we're all losing our trust in him at this point 
. Anyway, only time will tell what happens next, I guess 
.
. First, they say they're getting rid of blue checks and then BAM! Some high-profile account gets taken away without explanation 
. But honestly, it's just confusing everyone 
. They're so focused on making money off paid features like Twitter Blue that they're not even addressing the actual problem 
. It feels like Musk is trying to nickel and dime us instead of fixing the real issues with the platform 
. Time will tell if this new system actually works or just creates more headaches 
.
.
.
. newsflash: verifying users doesn't equal treating everyone equally 
so like what's up with Twitter now? they just take away blue check marks from random accounts and it's all because of Elon Musk 
. And let's be real, the whole thing with the paid feature of Twitter Blue just feels like a sneaky way to make more money 
.
And who knows, maybe paying for verification will actually help weed out the bots and impersonators? Stranger things have happened, right? 