The President Trump's fascination with acquiring Greenland, a self-governing territory ruled by Denmark, has been an enduring theme throughout his presidency, driven largely by his close friend Ronald Lauder, heir to the global cosmetics brand Estée Lauder.
In 2018, Lauder, who had known Trump for over 60 years, brought up the idea of the US purchasing Greenland while advising Trump, who was already showing interest in expanding American influence in the Arctic region. Following the proposal, a team at the White House began to explore ways to increase US sway in Greenland.
Lauder's motivation behind pushing this agenda is not entirely clear, but it appears that his business interests are closely aligned with those of the Trump administration. In recent years, Lauder has been expanding his commercial holdings in Greenland and has become part of a consortium seeking to access Ukrainian minerals.
The connection between Lauder's business interests and Trump's policies was exposed after the US journalist Peter Baker reported on the president's fascination with acquiring Greenland for their book "The Divider". Since then, Lauder has become increasingly influential in shaping US policy, particularly when it comes to matters related to Arctic expansion and resource exploitation.
Lauder has defended his involvement in shaping US policy as a way of promoting strategic interests. However, critics have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of Lauder's business interests on Trump's decision-making process.
One such instance is Trump's proposed acquisition of Ukraine's lithium deposits, which some argue was driven by Lauder's interest in exploiting these resources for his business. In response to this pushback, Trump has continued to advocate for US control over Ukraine's resources, despite mounting criticism from foreign leaders and politicians.
The relationship between Trump and Lauder has been described as a complex web of personal friendships, mutual interests, and political loyalty. As the Trump administration continues to grapple with questions about its involvement in Arctic expansion and resource exploitation, Lauder's role remains shrouded in controversy.
Trump's fixation on acquiring Greenland has also raised concerns about his imperial ambitions and willingness to use military force to achieve his goals. When asked about the possibility of taking the island by force, Trump responded that "we're going to be doing something with Greenland," either through diplomacy or coercion.
The situation remains fluid, with Denmark's prime minister warning against any form of military action that could break the NATO alliance. Lauder, who has previously condemned far-right figures, has also maintained his close ties with Trump, despite earlier expressing outrage at some of his stances on issues related to Ukraine and Israel.
In a complex landscape marked by loyalty, self-interest, and imperial ambitions, one thing is clear: Ronald Lauder's involvement in shaping US policy is closely tied to his business interests, and this relationship has become increasingly influential in the Trump administration.
In 2018, Lauder, who had known Trump for over 60 years, brought up the idea of the US purchasing Greenland while advising Trump, who was already showing interest in expanding American influence in the Arctic region. Following the proposal, a team at the White House began to explore ways to increase US sway in Greenland.
Lauder's motivation behind pushing this agenda is not entirely clear, but it appears that his business interests are closely aligned with those of the Trump administration. In recent years, Lauder has been expanding his commercial holdings in Greenland and has become part of a consortium seeking to access Ukrainian minerals.
The connection between Lauder's business interests and Trump's policies was exposed after the US journalist Peter Baker reported on the president's fascination with acquiring Greenland for their book "The Divider". Since then, Lauder has become increasingly influential in shaping US policy, particularly when it comes to matters related to Arctic expansion and resource exploitation.
Lauder has defended his involvement in shaping US policy as a way of promoting strategic interests. However, critics have raised questions about potential conflicts of interest and the influence of Lauder's business interests on Trump's decision-making process.
One such instance is Trump's proposed acquisition of Ukraine's lithium deposits, which some argue was driven by Lauder's interest in exploiting these resources for his business. In response to this pushback, Trump has continued to advocate for US control over Ukraine's resources, despite mounting criticism from foreign leaders and politicians.
The relationship between Trump and Lauder has been described as a complex web of personal friendships, mutual interests, and political loyalty. As the Trump administration continues to grapple with questions about its involvement in Arctic expansion and resource exploitation, Lauder's role remains shrouded in controversy.
Trump's fixation on acquiring Greenland has also raised concerns about his imperial ambitions and willingness to use military force to achieve his goals. When asked about the possibility of taking the island by force, Trump responded that "we're going to be doing something with Greenland," either through diplomacy or coercion.
The situation remains fluid, with Denmark's prime minister warning against any form of military action that could break the NATO alliance. Lauder, who has previously condemned far-right figures, has also maintained his close ties with Trump, despite earlier expressing outrage at some of his stances on issues related to Ukraine and Israel.
In a complex landscape marked by loyalty, self-interest, and imperial ambitions, one thing is clear: Ronald Lauder's involvement in shaping US policy is closely tied to his business interests, and this relationship has become increasingly influential in the Trump administration.
like, who would've thought he'd be obsessed with buying an entire island? 
And it's all because of some dude Lauder who's basically a billionaire with connections everywhere... his motives are sketchy at best 
. And now we're worried about him getting us into another war just to get access to some resources 
like, Trump 2024: bring it on 
.
and what's with all these shady deals with Ukraine's lithium deposits? 
This whole thing reeks of corruption and power struggles... like, where's the transparency? 
. I mean, what does he even plan on doing with an entire island? 
is it just a vanity project or what? 
. It's all about who knows what in that Arctic region, and I'm worried about what could happen if we start talking military action over it 
. I get that both countries have interests, but this just seems too weird to be true... like Lauder's been pulling the strings behind the scenes or something 
. At least Trump is keeping it real about wanting to "do something" with Greenland 
estee lauder is so iconic anyway lol did u no they have a new lipstick collection out? 
i swear i need to get my hands on that ASAP anywayz back to greenland, idk wut's the point of it all but i guess trump thinks it'll boost america's power in the arctic or whatever 
does anyone else think lauder is just trying to line his pockets with us funds tho? 
. This whole thing reeks of cronyism and self-serving politicians who only care about lining their own pockets. And what's next? Is he gonna try to take over Canada or something? 
The thought of it gives me the chills...
. I mean, what's the real motivation here? Is it about strategic interests or personal gain? 
Lauder's got some serious connections to Ukraine and minerals, so maybe there's more to this than meets the eye 
, but what happens when that conflicts with Denmark's interests or global stability? 
The whole thing feels like a messy web of personal friendships and business deals 
. Can't help but wonder if we're setting ourselves up for a major diplomatic disaster 
meanwhile lauder is just profiting off trump's ego idk wut's more sus lauder's involvement or trumps decision making process 
meanwhile denmark's prime minister is all "no no no" and we're over here like "peace out, nato" 
. It's like, one guy's business interests are basically guiding US policy now 
. And what's even creepier is that it seems like Lauder's got some kind of personal stake in exploiting Ukraine's minerals 
.