US military strikes Venezuela, sending shockwaves through Latin America as tensions with Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico boil over.
The United States has unleashed a large-scale military strike against Venezuela, abducting President Nicolas Maduro in an escalation that has sent ripples across the region. The move, which Trump doubled down on by threatening action against the governments of Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico unless they "get their act together", reignites deep-seated tensions over US interference in Latin America.
But can the military forces of these countries withstand the might of the US? A closer look at the regional armed forces reveals a stark reality: the US boasts the strongest military in the world, with a defense budget of $895 billion in 2025 - more than the combined budgets of the next ten largest spenders. Brazil comes closest to rivaling the US, ranking 11th globally, followed by Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, and Cuba, all significantly weaker.
In a conventional war, the US would undoubtedly maintain overwhelming superiority. However, Latin American countries have one notable edge: their paramilitary forces. These groups often employ asymmetrical tactics, operating outside the boundaries of traditional military strategy. In some cases, they've even been tolerated or supported by the state.
Cuba boasts the world's third-largest paramilitary force, with over 1.14 million members. Venezuela has pro-government armed civilian groups known as "colectivos", who enforce political control and intimidate opponents, often with tacit support from the government. Colombia's right-wing paramilitaries emerged in the 1980s to fight left-wing rebels, re-emerging as criminal or neo-paramilitary organisations after official demobilisation.
In Mexico, heavily armed drug cartels function as de facto paramilitary forces, exerting territorial control and challenging state authority. The Mexican military has increasingly deployed itself in law enforcement roles, sparking concerns about its own capacity to resist US pressure.
The history of US interference in Latin America is a complex one, spanning centuries. From the "Banana Wars" of the late 19th and early 20th centuries to the CIA-backed coups of the Cold War era, Washington has repeatedly inserted itself into regional affairs. The most notable exception was Panama's 1989 invasion by US forces under President George HW Bush.
As tensions between the US and Latin America escalate, it remains to be seen whether these countries can successfully resist the pressure from their more powerful neighbour.
The United States has unleashed a large-scale military strike against Venezuela, abducting President Nicolas Maduro in an escalation that has sent ripples across the region. The move, which Trump doubled down on by threatening action against the governments of Colombia, Cuba, and Mexico unless they "get their act together", reignites deep-seated tensions over US interference in Latin America.
But can the military forces of these countries withstand the might of the US? A closer look at the regional armed forces reveals a stark reality: the US boasts the strongest military in the world, with a defense budget of $895 billion in 2025 - more than the combined budgets of the next ten largest spenders. Brazil comes closest to rivaling the US, ranking 11th globally, followed by Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, and Cuba, all significantly weaker.
In a conventional war, the US would undoubtedly maintain overwhelming superiority. However, Latin American countries have one notable edge: their paramilitary forces. These groups often employ asymmetrical tactics, operating outside the boundaries of traditional military strategy. In some cases, they've even been tolerated or supported by the state.
Cuba boasts the world's third-largest paramilitary force, with over 1.14 million members. Venezuela has pro-government armed civilian groups known as "colectivos", who enforce political control and intimidate opponents, often with tacit support from the government. Colombia's right-wing paramilitaries emerged in the 1980s to fight left-wing rebels, re-emerging as criminal or neo-paramilitary organisations after official demobilisation.
In Mexico, heavily armed drug cartels function as de facto paramilitary forces, exerting territorial control and challenging state authority. The Mexican military has increasingly deployed itself in law enforcement roles, sparking concerns about its own capacity to resist US pressure.
The history of US interference in Latin America is a complex one, spanning centuries. From the "Banana Wars" of the late 19th and early 20th centuries to the CIA-backed coups of the Cold War era, Washington has repeatedly inserted itself into regional affairs. The most notable exception was Panama's 1989 invasion by US forces under President George HW Bush.
As tensions between the US and Latin America escalate, it remains to be seen whether these countries can successfully resist the pressure from their more powerful neighbour.
So the US just dropped a massive military strike on Venezuela, but what really got me thinking is how weak the regional armed forces are compared to the US. I mean, have you seen Cuba's paramilitary force? 1.14 million strong! That's like a small army right there... 
And then you've got Colombia and Mexico, with their own paramilitary groups, but they're not exactly swimming in cash like the US.
and yeah i remember when trump was all talkin about invade cuba lol didnt happen tho 
what do u guys think? can venezuela withstand the pressure?
This whole situation is a reminder that no matter how powerful or strong you think you are, there's always a fine line between being confident in your abilities and being overconfident. The US might have a huge military budget, but Latin America has something the US doesn't: resilience. These countries have been through tough times before and have come out stronger on the other side. They know how to use their "paramilitary forces" in creative ways that can be just as effective as traditional military tactics. It's time for the US to remember that sometimes, it's not about being the strongest, but about being wise and diplomatic 
A diagram showing a US flag at top left, a Venezuela flag at bottom left, and several smaller flags of Colombia, Cuba, Mexico, and Brazil in the middle... each with a red X symbol overlaid on it to represent opposition 
. I don't get why they're doing it, but I guess it's because of some issues with politics and stuff.
.
. It's like, whoa, how do these countries even stand up to the US? They're way more powerful than them in a conventional war 
and it'll be interesting to see how all these countries interact with each other. One thing's for sure, though - the US isn't gonna get away with just messing around with Latin America without facing some serious pushback 
.
. The question on everyone's mind now is whether these countries can successfully resist US pressure and forge their own paths forward 
.
. One thing's for sure, though – the situation in Latin America is going to be closely watched by people around the world 
.