HSBC's top executives faced intense scrutiny from shareholders on Monday, as investors demanded answers over the bank's strategy and potential breakup of its Asian business.
At an informal shareholder meeting in Hong Kong, HSBC Chairman Mark Tucker and CEO Noel Quinn fielded questions from investors on a range of issues, including the bank's approach to demands for an overhaul of its business and its purchase of Silicon Valley Bank's UK arm.
Tucker and Quinn both reiterated that the board recommends shareholders vote against a resolution that would require the bank to come up with a plan to spin off or reorganize its Asian business, which is HSBC's main source of profits. Tucker stated bluntly that "it would not be in your interest to split the bank."
Shareholders in Hong Kong, where HSBC is a mainstay of many retail investors' portfolios, have been unhappy with the bank's performance in other regions and argue that its Asian business has dragged down the lender's overall performance.
However, Quinn said that HSBC's profits in Hong Kong and the UK are no longer being impacted by underperformance elsewhere, and that the group as a whole is performing well. When pressed on the issue, he warned that a breakup of the bank would result in "significant revenue loss" due to the reliance on cross-border transactions.
HSBC has faced pressure from its largest shareholder, Ping An, which holds an 8% stake in the bank and has backed calls for the bank to rethink its structure. However, Ping An's views have not changed since last November, and it is expected to support any initiatives that could boost HSBC's stock performance or value.
The bank's acquisition of Silicon Valley Bank's UK arm has also been a point of contention, with critics questioning whether HSBC had adequate time to carry out due diligence on the deal. However, Quinn and Tucker defended the acquisition as a good business opportunity that would allow the bank to gain hundreds of innovative startups as customers.
Overall, HSBC's top executives face a challenging situation, as they must navigate the demands of shareholders while also addressing concerns over the bank's strategy and potential breakup of its Asian business.
At an informal shareholder meeting in Hong Kong, HSBC Chairman Mark Tucker and CEO Noel Quinn fielded questions from investors on a range of issues, including the bank's approach to demands for an overhaul of its business and its purchase of Silicon Valley Bank's UK arm.
Tucker and Quinn both reiterated that the board recommends shareholders vote against a resolution that would require the bank to come up with a plan to spin off or reorganize its Asian business, which is HSBC's main source of profits. Tucker stated bluntly that "it would not be in your interest to split the bank."
Shareholders in Hong Kong, where HSBC is a mainstay of many retail investors' portfolios, have been unhappy with the bank's performance in other regions and argue that its Asian business has dragged down the lender's overall performance.
However, Quinn said that HSBC's profits in Hong Kong and the UK are no longer being impacted by underperformance elsewhere, and that the group as a whole is performing well. When pressed on the issue, he warned that a breakup of the bank would result in "significant revenue loss" due to the reliance on cross-border transactions.
HSBC has faced pressure from its largest shareholder, Ping An, which holds an 8% stake in the bank and has backed calls for the bank to rethink its structure. However, Ping An's views have not changed since last November, and it is expected to support any initiatives that could boost HSBC's stock performance or value.
The bank's acquisition of Silicon Valley Bank's UK arm has also been a point of contention, with critics questioning whether HSBC had adequate time to carry out due diligence on the deal. However, Quinn and Tucker defended the acquisition as a good business opportunity that would allow the bank to gain hundreds of innovative startups as customers.
Overall, HSBC's top executives face a challenging situation, as they must navigate the demands of shareholders while also addressing concerns over the bank's strategy and potential breakup of its Asian business.
So I think it's kinda crazy how HSBC is being squeezed by shareholders on both sides. On one hand, some investors are pushing for a breakup of their Asian business, saying it's dragging down the whole company, but then there are others who want them to spin off certain parts and focus more on other regions.
. the thing is, hsbc has been doing pretty well in europe and uk, so why should shareholders care about the asian business? maybe they just need to give it more time and focus on the positives? or maybe, just maybe, a breakup could be good for them in the long run 
they're basically saying "hey, asian business is good enough" when really, it's just dragging the whole bank down. wouldn't it be better to cut ties and focus on something that actually makes money? 
... that's gotta be a good thing for long-term investors, right? 
.
. However, even Ping An appears to be hedging its bets, suggesting a willingness to support initiatives that boost the bank's stock performance rather than advocating for radical structural changes 
.
. The outcome will be crucial not only for HSBC but also for the stability of the global banking system as a whole 
.
I mean, I get it, investors need answers, but come on, let's not make them sit in some formal room with all those suits and ties...it's like, hello, this is 2025, can't we just have a Zoom call or something? 
And what's up with all the jargon, 'spin off', 'reorganize', like, what does that even mean? 
. It's like they're saying "Hey, shareholders! We know we haven't been doing so great elsewhere, but our Asian division is a golden goose, so just trust us on this one!" 
Instead, we're stuck with a bunch of suits trying to calm down their investors while simultaneously making questionable business decisions