Minneapolis Woman's Fatal Shooting by ICE Agent Resembles Chicago Incidents; Government Response Follows Pattern
On Wednesday, Renee Nicole Good, a 33-year-old woman from Minneapolis, was fatally shot by an immigration enforcement agent who claimed she had struck the officer. However, footage shows otherwise – Good did not hit the agent and he was not in her direct path.
Good's death echoes two recent incidents involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in the Chicago area. In September, 38-year-old Silverio Villegas González, a father of two from Mexico, was shot by ICE agents after they claimed he had driven his car at them. The agent, Charles Exum, claimed that González had dragged him "a significant distance" and that an agent opened fire in fear for his life. However, available videos show the opposite – González simply backing up and then moving forward before being shot.
In October, 30-year-old Marimar Martínez was grazed by a bullet while driving her car on the Southwest Side of Chicago. She had been honking and yelling at Border Patrol agents in an SUV when the vehicle suddenly collided with hers. One agent, Exum, got out and shot Martinez five times before she received medical attention.
In both incidents, Homeland Security reported that the agents involved were under attack or had been injured, and they claimed that the person shot was to blame for the violence. This narrative is repeated in the case of Good's death – President Trump labeled her a "domestic terrorist" despite video footage showing no connection between her actions and the agent's claim of self-defense.
The pattern of the administration's response to these incidents is clear: the agents are initially praised, and the person shot is vilified before any thorough investigation takes place. Even after charges against Martínez were dropped, Homeland Security maintained its initial story.
The FBI has now launched an investigation into Good's death, while similar investigations were underway in Chicago. However, it remains to be seen whether these agencies will follow through on their promise to examine the agents' actions more closely.
On Wednesday, Renee Nicole Good, a 33-year-old woman from Minneapolis, was fatally shot by an immigration enforcement agent who claimed she had struck the officer. However, footage shows otherwise – Good did not hit the agent and he was not in her direct path.
Good's death echoes two recent incidents involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents in the Chicago area. In September, 38-year-old Silverio Villegas González, a father of two from Mexico, was shot by ICE agents after they claimed he had driven his car at them. The agent, Charles Exum, claimed that González had dragged him "a significant distance" and that an agent opened fire in fear for his life. However, available videos show the opposite – González simply backing up and then moving forward before being shot.
In October, 30-year-old Marimar Martínez was grazed by a bullet while driving her car on the Southwest Side of Chicago. She had been honking and yelling at Border Patrol agents in an SUV when the vehicle suddenly collided with hers. One agent, Exum, got out and shot Martinez five times before she received medical attention.
In both incidents, Homeland Security reported that the agents involved were under attack or had been injured, and they claimed that the person shot was to blame for the violence. This narrative is repeated in the case of Good's death – President Trump labeled her a "domestic terrorist" despite video footage showing no connection between her actions and the agent's claim of self-defense.
The pattern of the administration's response to these incidents is clear: the agents are initially praised, and the person shot is vilified before any thorough investigation takes place. Even after charges against Martínez were dropped, Homeland Security maintained its initial story.
The FBI has now launched an investigation into Good's death, while similar investigations were underway in Chicago. However, it remains to be seen whether these agencies will follow through on their promise to examine the agents' actions more closely.