'I'm picking winners': UK business secretary takes activist approach to economic growth

UK Business Secretary Peter Kyle is taking an activist approach to boost economic growth by betting big on winners - companies that show significant potential for scale-up. In Davos, the UK's business secretary emphasized that investing in these growing businesses could create thousands of new jobs and immense wealth.

Kyle's comments echo those of former Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who advocated for a muscular approach to industrial policy, allowing the private sector to decide which companies thrive. However, Kyle takes this idea further by suggesting that the government should actively intervene to accelerate economic growth.

"We're predicted to grow 1.5% this year - that is not enough," Kyle said in Davos, pointing out that the UK needs faster growth to create real benefits for its people. He highlighted the recent decision to allow the state-owned British Business Bank to invest in companies like Octopus's software spin-off Kraken.

Kyle emphasized the importance of scale-up companies, which he claims have enormous potential for growth and job creation. By betting big on these winners, the government can expedite their growth and unlock immense wealth, recycling it through the economy rapidly.

While acknowledging that there will be failures, Kyle stressed that in order to have a healthy economy, failure must lead to success. He is "betting big" on companies with huge potential, which he believes will bring significant rewards for the UK.

The business secretary also discussed the need to attract global talent and invest in life sciences, citing America's tariffs as a disruptor to innovation. Kyle suggested that Britain offers a favorable regulatory environment for scientific endeavors and will actively court wealthy entrepreneurs and innovators.

Interestingly, Kyle expressed skepticism about public concerns over migration, arguing that it is primarily related to the asylum system and immigration policy inherited by the Tories. He stated that people with significant investment potential should not be deterred from coming to the UK.

Kyle's efforts to boost economic growth and create jobs are closely tied to Labour leader Keir Starmer's agenda. As business secretary, Kyle has been working closely with his successor and friend Liz Kendall, ensuring a smooth transition in their roles.

The UK government's focus on AI adoption is also part of its broader strategy for creating jobs and stimulating growth. Kyle noted that Labour will not stand idly by while industrial change causes pain and disruption; instead, the party aims to mitigate its effects on poorer communities by actively supporting technological innovation.

Overall, Peter Kyle is taking a bold approach to boost economic growth by investing in winners - companies with significant potential for scale-up. By actively intervening in these growing businesses, he believes the government can create new jobs, stimulate wealth creation, and ensure that everyone benefits from this economic growth.
 
I'm loving the fact that UK Business Secretary Peter Kyle is putting his money where his mouth is when it comes to boosting economic growth πŸ€‘! Investing in companies with huge potential for scale-up could really make a difference in creating thousands of new jobs and wealth. I think it's awesome that he's taking inspiration from Margaret Thatcher, but putting his own spin on industrial policy.

I'm also intrigued by his comments about attracting global talent and investing in life sciences - it seems like the UK is playing catch-up with other countries when it comes to innovation πŸ€”. Kyle's skepticism about public concerns over migration is also a valid point - I think we need to stop stigmatizing migrants and focus on creating opportunities for everyone to thrive.

The fact that Kyle's approach is closely tied to Labour leader Keir Starmer's agenda makes me wonder if this is a long-term strategy to create jobs and stimulate growth. Either way, I'm excited to see where this takes the UK economy πŸ’Έ!
 
πŸ’₯ what's up with Kyle being so aggressive about economic growth? like, I get it, 1.5% growth ain't cuttin' it 🀯 but betting big on companies gotta be a risk πŸ’Έ. can't have him just throwin' money around willy-nilly πŸ˜‚. needs to be some kinda return or he's just losin' cash πŸ€‘. and what about all the failed startups? how's that gonna look on his resume? πŸ€”
 
Dude, so the UK's business secretary is trying to be the next Tony Robbins or something 🀣. He's all about betting big on companies that are gonna change the game, creating jobs and wealth galore. I mean, who doesn't love a good gamble, right? πŸ’Έ But seriously, it's nice to see someone taking a proactive approach to boost economic growth. The problem is, we'll still have failures, and sometimes they can be pretty brutal πŸ€•.

I'm not sure if the UK's regulatory environment for scientific endeavors is as welcoming as Kyle says it is 😏. I mean, America's tariffs are a disruptor to innovation? That's a bit of an understatement, don't you think? πŸ™„ And let's not forget about public concerns over migration – it's not just about the asylum system and immigration policy; it's about making sure everyone feels welcome in their own country.

But I guess that's what Labour is trying to do, so there's that πŸ‘. It's all about creating jobs, stimulating growth, and ensuring everyone benefits from this economic boom πŸŽ‰. We'll just have to wait and see how it all plays out πŸ’₯.
 
I'm so over this whole "betting big on winners" thing πŸ€‘. Like, what's next? The government's gonna start investing all their money in avocado toast factories or something? I mean, seriously, how do we know these companies are even worthy of that kind of investment? We can't just throw our cash around and expect to get rich quick πŸ’Έ. What about the risks? What if they all fail and take our money with them? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ And don't even get me started on the whole "failure leads to success" thing... sounds like a recipe for disaster 🚨. I'm not buying it. We need some good old-fashioned caution and common sense before we start throwing around millions of pounds like confetti πŸŽ‰.
 
uk business sec is tryin out activitist econ pol but its a bit worryin πŸ€” scale up companies can be hit or miss and gov intervention can lead to some not so good outcomes...like what happened with the oil industry 🚨 dont wanna be all greedy on them big wins tho, gotta consider the smaller guys too πŸ’Έ
 
I got some thoughts on this UK Business Secretary Peter Kyle's plans to boost economic growth πŸ€”. I mean, 1.5% growth is not enough, right? We need faster growth to create real benefits for the people, you feel me? πŸ’Έ It's all about investing in companies that show significant potential for scale-up and creating thousands of new jobs. But at the same time, we gotta acknowledge that there will be failures and that failure can lead to success 🀝.

I also think it's cool that Kyle is taking a more activist approach, unlike Thatcher who was all about letting the private sector decide which companies thrive. This new approach could bring in some fresh ideas and help accelerate economic growth πŸ’₯. And I'm loving the fact that he's focusing on life sciences and attracting global talent – Britain should be the hub for scientific innovation 🧬.

It's also interesting to see how this is all connected to Labour leader Keir Starmer's agenda, but that's a whole other story 🀝. Overall, Kyle's plans are bold, and I think it's worth keeping an eye on how they play out πŸ‘€.
 
I'm thinking... πŸ€” The way Peter Kyle is going about boosting economic growth is kinda interesting. I mean, investing in companies with huge potential for scale-up could definitely create thousands of new jobs and immense wealth. But at the same time, it's also kinda worrying that he's taking a more activist approach. Like, what if some of these businesses don't quite live up to their promise? πŸ€‘

I'm not sure I agree with him that failure should always lead to success, but I get where he's coming from. It's all about creating a healthy economy and making sure everyone benefits from growth. The idea of attracting global talent and investing in life sciences is also a good one - it could really help the UK stay competitive.

But what really caught my eye was his comment about people with significant investment potential not being deterred by public concerns over migration. I mean, I get where he's coming from, but at the same time... πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ shouldn't we be having that conversation too?
 
πŸ€” I think it's dope that they're putting their faith in these high-potential companies to create a massive impact on the UK economy πŸ’Έ. Like, if you bet big on the right people, you can definitely get some huge rewards πŸ†. And I'm all for the government helping out to give them an edge πŸ”₯. It's like they say, "failure leads to success" - and that's gotta be true in this case too πŸ˜‚.

Also, I'm low-key stoked about the focus on life sciences and AI adoption πŸ§¬πŸ€–. We need more innovation happening over there ASAP ⏱️. And I think it's sick that they're looking at attracting global talent to the UK - we gotta be competitive in the global market, fam πŸ’Ό.

But for real though, I'm worried about people getting too caught up in the idea of "winners" and forgetting about those who might lose out on the whole economic growth thing πŸ€•. We need to make sure everyone benefits from this, not just a select few πŸ‘.
 
I'm loving this - it's about time we talk about economic growth πŸ€‘. I mean, 1.5% is not enough, Peter Kyle says... and you know what? I kinda agree with him. We need some bold moves to shake things up in the UK economy.

But here's the thing - do we want the government actively intervening in businesses all the time? πŸ€” That sounds a bit like socialism to me, and we all know how that turns out... or do we? I think Kyle is taking a smart approach by betting big on winners. It's about creating jobs, stimulating growth, and making sure everyone benefits.

And let's not forget about AI adoption - it's a game-changer for our economy πŸ€–. But what about the people who are getting left behind in all this technological change? We need to make sure that Labour's support for innovation doesn't just benefit the wealthy elite... or does it?

It's interesting how Kyle is courted global talent and life sciences - maybe we should be encouraging more entrepreneurs from other countries to come over 🌎. And what about those with significant investment potential who are worried about migration? Do we need to relax our asylum system a bit? These are tough questions, but I think Kyle is on the right track... for now 😏.
 
I'm not sure about this... πŸ€” I mean, on one hand, I think it's a great idea to invest in companies with huge potential for growth and job creation - it could totally turn things around for the UK economy! πŸ’Έ We do need faster growth to create real benefits for our people. And yeah, scale-up companies can have enormous impact... but at what cost? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ The government is basically betting big on winners, which means there's a risk of losing money if they don't pan out. I mean, what if they fail? Shouldn't we be more cautious?

And while I agree that Britain offers a favorable regulatory environment for scientific endeavors, shouldn't we also consider the human cost of attracting wealthy entrepreneurs and innovators? Like, what about people who are already living here but can't afford to compete with foreign talent? It's all very complicated... 🀯 I'm not sure I completely trust this plan.
 
I'm kinda excited about Peter Kyle's plans to invest in companies that have real potential for growth πŸš€πŸ’Έ. It's about time we stop playing small and aim high! The UK needs a serious boost to get back on track after the pandemic, and I think Kyle's approach is spot on. By backing winners, he's hoping to create thousands of new jobs and bring in that wealth for everyone to enjoy πŸ€‘.

I also love how he's talking about scale-up companies having "enormous potential" - it's like he's saying we should be playing the long game here, not just thinking about short-term gains πŸ’‘. And I'm all for investing in life sciences and attracting global talent too! Who wouldn't want to live and work in a country that's hot on innovation? 🌟

I do have some concerns about Kyle's views on migration, though... it's not as simple as just telling people with potential to come and join us without any thought for the bigger picture πŸ€”. Still, overall, I think Peter Kyle is onto something here, and I'm excited to see where his plans take us πŸ‘
 
πŸ€” I think it's cool that Peter Kyle is taking a bold approach to boost economic growth. The UK needs faster growth to create real benefits for its people 🌟. By betting big on companies with huge potential, he believes they'll bring significant rewards for the UK πŸ€‘. However, I'm not sure if actively intervening in these growing businesses is the right move πŸ’Έ. What if some of these companies don't live up to expectations? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” I think it's cool how Peter Kyle is trying to boost UK economy by betting on winners... Companies with huge potential for growth and job creation πŸš€πŸ’Ό. He's saying the gov needs to step in and help these companies scale up ASAP ⏱️ so they can create thousands of new jobs and make lots of wealth πŸ’Έ.

But, what if he's right? I mean, 1.5% growth isn't enough for anyone πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. And I get why he wants to attract global talent and invest in life sciences - America's tariffs are a major bummer for innovation 🚫.

The thing is, I'm curious how he'll balance helping these companies with the risk of failures πŸ’”. Like, what if some companies don't make it? Will that affect the whole economy? 🀯

I also wonder if this is all connected to Labour's agenda and Keir Starmer's plans for jobs and growth πŸ—³οΈ. Either way, I think it's exciting to see someone like Peter Kyle taking a bold approach to boost UK economy πŸ’ͺ!
 
πŸ“ˆ I think the UK's business secretary is totally on point 🀩, investing in companies that show massive potential for scale-up is a solid plan to boost economic growth ⚑️. It's crazy how some people are still downplaying the importance of innovation and job creation πŸ’Έ. With the state-owned British Business Bank getting involved, I'm all for accelerating these companies' growth πŸš€. But at the same time, we gotta acknowledge that there'll be failures - it's just part of the game πŸ€”. I love how Kyle is taking a long-term view and wanting to ensure everyone benefits from this economic growth 🌈. It's all about creating a healthy economy where failure leads to success πŸ“ˆπŸ’ͺ
 
I'm not sure about this whole "betting big" on winners thing... I mean, it sounds like a good idea on paper, but what if most of these companies fail? It's not just about throwing money at them and hoping for the best. The government needs to be careful not to create another financial crisis on its hands. πŸ€”

Also, I'm skeptical about Peter Kyle's comments on migration. He says people with investment potential shouldn't be deterred from coming to the UK, but what about the social impact? How are we going to support these new arrivals and make sure they integrate into society?

And have you seen the UK's current growth predictions? 1.5% isn't exactly a thriving economy if you ask me. I'd like to see more concrete numbers before I start getting excited about Kyle's plans. πŸ“‰
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if I love or hate Peter Kyle's approach to boosting economic growth πŸ€‘. On one hand, it's good to see him investing in companies with huge potential for scale-up, which could lead to thousands of new jobs and immense wealth πŸ’Έ. The UK definitely needs faster growth than the predicted 1.5% this year 😬.

But on the other hand, I'm not convinced that active government intervention is the answer πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. What if it leads to too much crony capitalism or favoritism towards big companies? 🀝 And what about the risks of failure? Kyle says that in order to have a healthy economy, failure must lead to success, but how do we balance that with protecting the little guy? πŸ€”

I also wish he wouldn't dismiss public concerns over migration as unrelated to the asylum system and immigration policy πŸ˜•. It's not just about allowing wealthy entrepreneurs and innovators to come to the UK; it's also about creating a fair and inclusive society for everyone.

Overall, I think Kyle's efforts are well-intentioned, but we need to be careful not to overstep or create more problems than solutions πŸ’‘.
 
I'm just like "wow, 1.5% growth isn't enough lol" thinkin' Peter Kyle's right on point 🀩. I mean, if we wanna be a leader in the world, we need to make some big moves πŸ’Έ. Investing in scale-up companies and all that jazz makes total sense to me. I've got a friend who started a software company and it took off like crazy πŸš€. It's not just about the jobs, it's about creatin' new opportunities for people to thrive. And yeah, I get what Kyle means about failure leadin' to success... my ex was always sayin' that too πŸ˜‚. But seriously, if we wanna level up as a country, we need to be willin' to take some risks and invest in the future 🌟.
 
the idea of "betting big" on companies just feels like a fancy way to say we're gonna throw a ton of money at whatever business venture sounds good rn πŸ’Έ. and what's with the emphasis on scale-up companies? isn't it time we focus on supporting smaller businesses too, they're often where innovation happens πŸ€”. plus, isn't investing in these growing businesses just a fancy way of saying we're gonna bail out whoever gets lucky first? πŸ€‘
 
Back
Top