Inside the Transition Team Behind Mayor Zohran Mamdani's 'Sloppy' Vetting Process, Antisemitic Tweets Go Undetected
Mayor Zohran Mamdani's administration has been thrown into turmoil after it emerged that top transition officials opted not to complete a full vetting process before announcing one of his earliest hires, Catherine Almonte Da Costa, director of appointments. The decision to fast-track Da Costa, who had posted antisemitic tweets over a decade ago, has raised questions about the administration's vetting process and how it was mishandled.
According to sources, Mamdani's team was under pressure to announce key hires quickly, with many comparing their transition to that of former Mayor Bill de Blasio. To meet this timeline, they opted for an initial search of public records to identify potential candidates, but failed to uncover Da Costa's tweets due to her handle not being easily identifiable.
"It was rushed and sloppy," a source said, describing the vetting process as "a critical internal step that likely would have uncovered her tweets." However, despite this oversight, Mamdani announced Da Costa at a press conference without finishing her vetting. This move has sparked criticism from the Anti-Defamation League, which described her tweets as "indefensible."
Da Costa had initially expressed regret over the tweets but maintained she was not "indicative of who I am." However, her appointment created a cascade of problems for the nascent administration. Her resignation one day later led to questions about how the transition team managed its hiring process.
Some senior members of Mamdani's team have expressed frustration over Da Costa's appointment, pointing out that extra scrutiny was warranted given skepticism from business and Jewish communities. The team has since tightened its vetting process and paid $25,000 to a research firm to assist with its research.
Sources within the transition also raised concerns about the administration's reliance on a close-knit circle of former de Blasio aides. Sal Albanese, a former city council member, cautioned that Mamdani could fall prey to groupthink by hiring so many ex-de Blasio officials. While he believes Mamdani will learn from these mistakes, many of his advisers lack institutional knowledge and political instincts to run a government effectively.
The fallout from Da Costa's tweets has also led to finger-pointing among Mamdani's allies, with some expressing frustration over how her appointment was handled. The incident has raised questions about the administration's ability to manage its hiring process and prevent similar oversights in the future.
Mayor Zohran Mamdani's administration has been thrown into turmoil after it emerged that top transition officials opted not to complete a full vetting process before announcing one of his earliest hires, Catherine Almonte Da Costa, director of appointments. The decision to fast-track Da Costa, who had posted antisemitic tweets over a decade ago, has raised questions about the administration's vetting process and how it was mishandled.
According to sources, Mamdani's team was under pressure to announce key hires quickly, with many comparing their transition to that of former Mayor Bill de Blasio. To meet this timeline, they opted for an initial search of public records to identify potential candidates, but failed to uncover Da Costa's tweets due to her handle not being easily identifiable.
"It was rushed and sloppy," a source said, describing the vetting process as "a critical internal step that likely would have uncovered her tweets." However, despite this oversight, Mamdani announced Da Costa at a press conference without finishing her vetting. This move has sparked criticism from the Anti-Defamation League, which described her tweets as "indefensible."
Da Costa had initially expressed regret over the tweets but maintained she was not "indicative of who I am." However, her appointment created a cascade of problems for the nascent administration. Her resignation one day later led to questions about how the transition team managed its hiring process.
Some senior members of Mamdani's team have expressed frustration over Da Costa's appointment, pointing out that extra scrutiny was warranted given skepticism from business and Jewish communities. The team has since tightened its vetting process and paid $25,000 to a research firm to assist with its research.
Sources within the transition also raised concerns about the administration's reliance on a close-knit circle of former de Blasio aides. Sal Albanese, a former city council member, cautioned that Mamdani could fall prey to groupthink by hiring so many ex-de Blasio officials. While he believes Mamdani will learn from these mistakes, many of his advisers lack institutional knowledge and political instincts to run a government effectively.
The fallout from Da Costa's tweets has also led to finger-pointing among Mamdani's allies, with some expressing frustration over how her appointment was handled. The incident has raised questions about the administration's ability to manage its hiring process and prevent similar oversights in the future.