The Democrats' inaction on ICE is a national embarrassment. When two U.S. citizens were shot to death in the streets of Minneapolis, Americans might have expected a forceful response from the country's nominal opposition party. Unfortunately, that party is the Democrats, and their refusal to react proportionally to the threat of President Donald Trump and his army of secret police with "absolute immunity" is only making things worse.
Even before Alex Pretti was shot dead on Saturday – in the back, seconds after his concealed and holstered gun was disarmed by federal agents – the brutality of ICE and Customs and Border Protection's occupation of Minneapolis demanded definitive action. But Democrats delivered nothing but empty gestures and platitudes.
At the federal level, seven House Democrats, including mainstream media darling Washington Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez and outgoing Maine Rep. Jared Golden, voted with their GOP counterparts last week to pass a bill giving even more money to ICE. That vote came after House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declined to whip his caucus into opposing the legislation, instead simply "recommending" a no vote.
Senate Democrats reportedly plan to kill the bill – knowing it would force a government shutdown – but their commitment to holding the line must be treated with suspicion. One notable exception is Rep. Delia Ramirez, D-Ill., who introduced legislation to restrict ICE's use of force, a bill she's characterized as "the bare minimum." Even that bill is unlikely to pass through the GOP-controlled House.
On the ground in Minnesota, Democratic Gov. Tim Walz was unable to meet the moment as early as January 7, when Renee Good was killed. Rather than forcefully show up for his constituents, Walz prioritized preemptively scolding protesters, posting: "Trump wants a show. Don't give it to him."
While Walz has been clear that he is angry over ICE's presence in the state and has asked that they leave, he's failed to provide any clear directives or policy proposals for expelling the agency from his state. Attorney General Keith Ellison has yet to bring any charges against Jonathan Ross, Good's killer, something Walz could order him to do under state law.
What Walz did do on January 20, days before Pretti's killing, was to invite the president to "join me, and others in our community, to help restore calm and order and reaffirm that true public safety comes from shared purpose, trust, and respect." Mere hours after Pretti's killing – and, importantly, drawing on the same playbook used with Good's killing – the administration made clear there was no "shared purpose, trust, and respect" to "reaffirm" with Minnesota.
The Democratic base has been demanding action on ICE for months. Eager to make political hay, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat with his sights set on the Senate seat held by Ed Markey, called ICE "cowards" and threatened to defund the agency and prosecute its officers. But most elected Democrats fall short of calling to abolish the institution outright – a position now held by a plurality of voters.
Leaders like Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, chair and vice chair, respectively, of the Democratic Governors Association, vaguely called on Saturday for "transparency and accountability" after "what happened today in Minneapolis," without specifying what concrete steps might be taken to deliver either.
The Democrats' refusal to take a stand against ICE is not just a matter of politics – it's a betrayal of their constituents. It's a reminder that the party is trapped in a world of its own creation, where committing to anything that might alienate mythical moderate conservative voters or, more importantly, donors, is anathema.
The party needs to wake up to the role we sorely need them to play and take action, before it's too late. Anything less would be a dereliction of duty and a betrayal of the public trust.
Even before Alex Pretti was shot dead on Saturday – in the back, seconds after his concealed and holstered gun was disarmed by federal agents – the brutality of ICE and Customs and Border Protection's occupation of Minneapolis demanded definitive action. But Democrats delivered nothing but empty gestures and platitudes.
At the federal level, seven House Democrats, including mainstream media darling Washington Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez and outgoing Maine Rep. Jared Golden, voted with their GOP counterparts last week to pass a bill giving even more money to ICE. That vote came after House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries declined to whip his caucus into opposing the legislation, instead simply "recommending" a no vote.
Senate Democrats reportedly plan to kill the bill – knowing it would force a government shutdown – but their commitment to holding the line must be treated with suspicion. One notable exception is Rep. Delia Ramirez, D-Ill., who introduced legislation to restrict ICE's use of force, a bill she's characterized as "the bare minimum." Even that bill is unlikely to pass through the GOP-controlled House.
On the ground in Minnesota, Democratic Gov. Tim Walz was unable to meet the moment as early as January 7, when Renee Good was killed. Rather than forcefully show up for his constituents, Walz prioritized preemptively scolding protesters, posting: "Trump wants a show. Don't give it to him."
While Walz has been clear that he is angry over ICE's presence in the state and has asked that they leave, he's failed to provide any clear directives or policy proposals for expelling the agency from his state. Attorney General Keith Ellison has yet to bring any charges against Jonathan Ross, Good's killer, something Walz could order him to do under state law.
What Walz did do on January 20, days before Pretti's killing, was to invite the president to "join me, and others in our community, to help restore calm and order and reaffirm that true public safety comes from shared purpose, trust, and respect." Mere hours after Pretti's killing – and, importantly, drawing on the same playbook used with Good's killing – the administration made clear there was no "shared purpose, trust, and respect" to "reaffirm" with Minnesota.
The Democratic base has been demanding action on ICE for months. Eager to make political hay, Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat with his sights set on the Senate seat held by Ed Markey, called ICE "cowards" and threatened to defund the agency and prosecute its officers. But most elected Democrats fall short of calling to abolish the institution outright – a position now held by a plurality of voters.
Leaders like Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear and Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, chair and vice chair, respectively, of the Democratic Governors Association, vaguely called on Saturday for "transparency and accountability" after "what happened today in Minneapolis," without specifying what concrete steps might be taken to deliver either.
The Democrats' refusal to take a stand against ICE is not just a matter of politics – it's a betrayal of their constituents. It's a reminder that the party is trapped in a world of its own creation, where committing to anything that might alienate mythical moderate conservative voters or, more importantly, donors, is anathema.
The party needs to wake up to the role we sorely need them to play and take action, before it's too late. Anything less would be a dereliction of duty and a betrayal of the public trust.