Bankruptcy Judge Intervenes in Leland House Auction, Denying Sale of Detroit's Historic Building
A US Bankruptcy Court judge has halted a fast-tracked auction of the historic Leland House in downtown Detroit, rejecting a sale that would have stripped displaced tenants of their rights without due process. The building, a 99-year-old landmark, was at the center of a heated dispute over its future.
The owner of the Leland House, Leland House Limited Partnership, had proposed selling the 22-story apartment building and an adjacent parking lot to secured creditors. However, the US Trustee, a federal watchdog in bankruptcy cases, objected to the sale, citing concerns about valuation, structure, and bidder protections.
Tenant advocates argued that the sale would have resulted in the displacement of tenants without adequate notice or compensation, and that their leases could not be wiped out through a "free and clear" sale. The court ultimately agreed, stating that the proposed sale was too hasty and did not provide sufficient protection for the tenants' rights.
This decision marks the second time that Judge Maria Oxholm has intervened in the case, following an emergency filing by DTE Energy to shut off power to the building without court approval. In December, Oxholm allowed the owner to get a $1.2 million loan to handle some of its debts, including a deposit of over $57,000 to keep the power on.
The halt in the auction has given tenants breathing room and ensures that any future sale of the Leland House cannot happen behind closed doors or at the expense of those who lived there. Tenant advocates hailed the decision as an important pause in the fight for the building's future.
Meanwhile, DTE Energy spokesperson Amanda Passage said the energy giant had no intention of pursuing the purchase of the Leland House. However, critics argue that the utility company has been trying to acquire the property on a block where it already owns most of the land and buildings, raising concerns about its motives.
The court's decision has left open the possibility that the owner could return with a revised sale proposal. However, for now, the Leland House remains under the control of the bankruptcy court, its future uncertain but one thing certain: the rights and interests of its tenants will be protected.
A US Bankruptcy Court judge has halted a fast-tracked auction of the historic Leland House in downtown Detroit, rejecting a sale that would have stripped displaced tenants of their rights without due process. The building, a 99-year-old landmark, was at the center of a heated dispute over its future.
The owner of the Leland House, Leland House Limited Partnership, had proposed selling the 22-story apartment building and an adjacent parking lot to secured creditors. However, the US Trustee, a federal watchdog in bankruptcy cases, objected to the sale, citing concerns about valuation, structure, and bidder protections.
Tenant advocates argued that the sale would have resulted in the displacement of tenants without adequate notice or compensation, and that their leases could not be wiped out through a "free and clear" sale. The court ultimately agreed, stating that the proposed sale was too hasty and did not provide sufficient protection for the tenants' rights.
This decision marks the second time that Judge Maria Oxholm has intervened in the case, following an emergency filing by DTE Energy to shut off power to the building without court approval. In December, Oxholm allowed the owner to get a $1.2 million loan to handle some of its debts, including a deposit of over $57,000 to keep the power on.
The halt in the auction has given tenants breathing room and ensures that any future sale of the Leland House cannot happen behind closed doors or at the expense of those who lived there. Tenant advocates hailed the decision as an important pause in the fight for the building's future.
Meanwhile, DTE Energy spokesperson Amanda Passage said the energy giant had no intention of pursuing the purchase of the Leland House. However, critics argue that the utility company has been trying to acquire the property on a block where it already owns most of the land and buildings, raising concerns about its motives.
The court's decision has left open the possibility that the owner could return with a revised sale proposal. However, for now, the Leland House remains under the control of the bankruptcy court, its future uncertain but one thing certain: the rights and interests of its tenants will be protected.
what kinda sale do you need "free and clear" to mess with ppl's homes? judge oxholm did the right thing btw, at least theres some hope that the owner wont just try to pawn it off again. its a shame DTE energy is involved tho, they seem like they got an ulterior motive 
I gotta say, this is a huge win for those Detroit tenants 
! They've been fighting to protect their home and rights for way too long, and it's awesome that the judge stepped in to make sure they get a fair shake 
. It's crazy how some people would try to swoop in and take over without giving anyone a chance to adjust 
. I'm glad DTE Energy isn't pursuing this sale, but we should still keep an eye on their motives 
. This decision is all about fairness and preserving the community spirit of that building 
!
. The idea of those poor tenants being forced out without even getting a proper say is just heartbreaking 
. It's amazing that Judge Oxholm stepped in to make sure they're treated fairly - I mean, who gets to decide on someone else's life like that? Not right! 
I'm also a bit worried about DTE Energy's motives though... all these big corporations trying to swoop in and take over our community centers is just not cool 
. But hey, at least the tenants have some breathing room now, and we can keep an eye on things from here 
.
. The fact that Judge Oxholm stepped in and halted the sale is a huge win for those displaced residents 
. I'm not surprised DTE Energy was trying to swoop in on this deal - they've got a lot of power already in the area 
. But at least now we know their intentions aren't purely altruistic 
. It's always a tough spot when you're trying to navigate debt and financial struggles, but sometimes it takes a big picture view to make sure everyone's treated fairly 
. And I have to wonder, what was the hurry on DTE Energy's part? Trying to acquire that land without getting caught up in all the fuss just doesn't sit right with me 
it's about time someone looked out for those tenants! i mean, can you imagine just being told that your home is gonna get sold to some big corp without even getting a chance to say goodbye? 
the court's decision to halt the auction and protect their rights is definitely a win. but what really gets my goat is how DTE Energy has been trying to acquire this property in the first place... i mean, do they not care that they're just trying to push people out of their homes so they can make more money? 
this judge is literally saving lives i mean these ppl have been living in that building for years without any guarantee of safety or security if they sold it to whoever wanted it most, the tenants wouldve been left high and dry 
gotta respect this judge for putting people over profit 
! finally some justice for those tenants who've been living in that historic building for years. i mean, can u imagine if they'd just gotten sold out like that? it's a total slap in the face to their struggles and sacrifices. glad the judge stepped in and said no way, we need to do this right 
. like, what were they really planning to do with the building anyway? buy up more land for expansion or something? it's all a bit suspicious if u ask me 
. When we prioritize profits over people, especially those who are already vulnerable like low-income renters, it's a slippery slope that can lead to devastating consequences for everyone involved 
. This decision isn't just about saving one building; it's about setting a precedent for fair and transparent decision-making in our communities 
. Let's hope that this pause can lead to a more comprehensive conversation about how we can balance progress with people's needs 
.
. This building has history and character, we need to make sure it gets preserved for future generations not just turned into a profit zone 
and what's up with dte energy trying to swoop in like that? they already own most of the land around the block... suspicious motive, if you ask me 
. Now let's see what happens next...