Justice for Jeyasre: how a brutal murder led to a better deal for garment workers in India

The article discusses the implementation of the Dindigul Agreement at Natchi, a garment factory in India that had faced criticism and scrutiny due to allegations of forced labor and poor working conditions. The agreement was signed by H&M Group, Walmart, Zara's owner Inditex, and other brands, with the aim of improving working conditions and reducing the risk of forced labor.

The article reports on the progress made since the agreement was implemented, including an increase in productivity, a reduction in harassment against women workers, and the establishment of a grievance mechanism. However, it also notes that some brands have been hesitant to source from Natchi, citing concerns about strikes and industrial disputes.

The article attributes this reluctance to a broader industry-wide attitude towards labor laws and regulations. Shivakumar, a professor at Cornell University's ILR School, is quoted as saying that the industry does not care about implementing labor reforms, except in response to major tragedies or disasters.

Kuruvilla, another expert, notes that some brands are unwilling to source from Natchi because they perceive collective bargaining agreements and labor management agreements as a liability. He suggests that this attitude is driven by concerns about strikes and industrial disputes.

The article concludes by highlighting the need for greater transparency and accountability in the fashion industry's supply chain, particularly when it comes to labor laws and regulations. Shivakumar is quoted as saying that unless there is some massive tragedy, nobody will do anything to implement meaningful reforms.

Overall, the article highlights the challenges of implementing labor reforms in the garment industry, particularly in countries like India where labor laws are often weak or poorly enforced. It also underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability from brands and other stakeholders in order to ensure that workers are protected and treated fairly.
 
πŸ€” I think what's really frustrating here is that it takes a major tragedy for brands to care about implementing real labor reforms. Like, what if this was just another Tuesday and not some high-profile factory collapse? Would anyone even be paying attention? πŸ€‘ The industry's always been more concerned with saving face than actually making changes.

And I get that collective bargaining agreements can be seen as a liability, but come on, isn't it better to prioritize the welfare of your workers over potential strikes and industrial disputes? It seems like some brands are just too invested in their bottom line to care about creating a sustainable, equitable supply chain. πŸ’Έ We need more pressure from consumers and activists to demand change, not just when there's a big scandal waiting to happen.
 
Man, it's wild how much pressure these fashion brands gotta deal with when it comes to labor laws 🀯. I mean, you got big names like H&M and Walmart signing up to the Dindigul Agreement, but still, some of them are hesitant to source from factories in India because they don't wanna risk strikes or industrial disputes 😬. It's like, come on guys, if your workers are being mistreated, what's the point of all that profit? I think these experts are onto something when they say it's not until there's a major tragedy that brands will start taking action πŸ’”. We need more transparency and accountability in the fashion industry, for real 🀝. Brands gotta take responsibility for their supply chains and ensure workers are treated fairly πŸ‘•
 
πŸ€” I'm low-key impressed that H&M Group, Walmart, and Inditex are actually putting their money where their mouth is on this Dindigul Agreement πŸ€‘. It's about time we see some serious change in the fashion industry when it comes to labor laws and regulations πŸ’Ό. But, at the same time, I'm kinda baffled by brands that are still hesitant to source from Natchi because of strikes and industrial disputes πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. Can't they just commit to implementing meaningful reforms for once? πŸ™„ It's also pretty eye-opening to hear experts say that labor laws are often weak or poorly enforced in countries like India 🌍. We need way more transparency and accountability from brands, especially when it comes to protecting workers' rights πŸ’ͺ. Until then, I'll just have to keep following this story closely πŸ‘€.
 
🀩 I think it's actually super cool that brands like H&M Group and Walmart are taking steps to improve working conditions at Natchi garment factory πŸ™Œ! I mean, sure, there's still a way to go, but progress is progress, right? πŸ’ͺ It's not easy to tackle issues like forced labor and poor working conditions, especially in industries with complex global supply chains 🀯.

And Shivakumar makes some valid points about the industry's reluctance to implement labor reforms πŸ“š. But I don't think it's entirely accurate to say that brands only care about reforming labor laws when there's a major tragedy or disaster 😬. There are still plenty of examples of brands taking proactive steps to improve working conditions and source from suppliers who meet certain standards πŸ’Ό.

It's also worth noting that the fact that some brands are hesitant to source from Natchi because they perceive collective bargaining agreements as a liability is a real concern πŸ€‘. But I think we need to be having more conversations about how to make labor management agreements work for everyone involved, not just brand managers 😊. Transparency and accountability are key πŸ’‘!
 
its crazy that even with agreements in place, brands still have no intention of improving labors rights 🀯 they only care when its on TV or theres a major issue thats gonna impact sales πŸ’Έ i mean whats the point of signing an agreement if u dont intend to follow thru? πŸ€”
 
I just read about H&M group signing Dindigul Agreement with Zara's owner Inditex, Walmart & Natchi garment factory. Sounds good on paper 🀞 but what really gets me is how some brands are still hesitant to source from there because of strikes & industrial disputes. Like, what's the big deal? You pay those workers and they'll work hard for you, right? I remember back in my day... we thought labor laws were meant to protect workers, not just as a PR stunt πŸ™„
 
πŸ˜” I'm so sorry to hear about the struggles of those garment factory workers in Natchi, India. It's heartbreaking to think about the forced labor and poor working conditions they've faced... and it's frustrating that some brands still have concerns about implementing reforms πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. It's like, shouldn't we be doing better than this? πŸ™„

I totally get why Shivakumar says the industry only cares about change when there's a major tragedy or disaster. That's just so sad πŸ€•. And it makes sense that Kuruvilla would say brands are hesitant to source from Natchi because they're worried about strikes and industrial disputes 😬.

But here's the thing: we need to do better, and we need to start now πŸ’ͺ. We need more transparency and accountability in the fashion industry's supply chain, especially when it comes to labor laws and regulations πŸ“Š. We need brands to step up and take responsibility for ensuring workers are treated fairly and with dignity πŸ’Ό.

It's not going to be easy, but we can make a difference if we work together 🀝. We just need to keep pushing for change and supporting brands that prioritize worker safety and well-being ❀️.
 
Back
Top