Legislators Push to Make Companies Tell Customers When Their Products Will Die

"Massachusetts Aims to Protect Consumers from Obsolete Smart Devices"

In a bid to safeguard consumers, two Massachusetts lawmakers have introduced bills that would require companies to disclose how long they will provide software and security updates for their connected products. The proposed legislation aims to reduce the threat of cybersecurity risks associated with smart devices that no longer receive regular support.

Under the bills, manufacturers would need to clearly inform customers on product packaging and online when a device is approaching its service life's end, and about features that may be lost and potential security vulnerabilities that will arise when regular support ends. This measure is seen as crucial in protecting consumers from becoming victims of malware attacks.

According to advocacy groups such as Consumer Reports and the Secure Resilient Future Foundation, this is an issue that has been growing more pronounced with the increasing use of smart devices in daily life. As a result, these organizations have encouraged lawmakers to support policy measures that would inform customers when their connected products are about to stop working.

In Massachusetts, two bills collectively known as An Act Relative to Consumer Connected Devices were introduced by state senator William Brownsberger and state representative David Rogers. While the bills are still in the early stages of development, supporters hope they will inspire more legislation at the state and federal levels in the near future.

Stacey Higginbotham, a policy fellow at Consumer Reports, emphasized that consumers need awareness about their devices' risks as manufacturers increasingly rely on software updates to keep them secure. "Your product is now connected to a manufacturer by this software tether that dictates how it's going to perform," she noted.

Paul Roberts, president of the Secure Resilient Future Foundation, added that reducing the attack surface against such vulnerable devices is crucial, adding "We cannot prevent it, but we do want to give consumers the awareness that they could be hosting something. Basically, they have an open door that can no longer be locked."

While similar legislation at other levels, including the US House and New York, is pending, advocates believe Massachusetts' initiative serves as a catalyst for broader change.
 
I gotta say πŸ€”, this is gonna be a wild ride if MA passes these bills πŸš€. Companies are already being super cautious about software updates, but it's still up to consumers to keep their devices secure πŸ’». I mean, who really wants to deal with malware and all that jazz πŸ˜’? Not me, that's for sure.

I think this is a good move, though - transparency is key πŸ“. Consumers need to know when their devices are about to become obsolete, so they can make informed decisions about whether to stick with 'em or upgrade πŸ€–. It's not about manufacturers being bad, it's just about being responsible πŸ‘Š.

Plus, this could set a precedent for other states and the feds to follow suit 🌟. We need more awareness about cybersecurity, period πŸ’‘. So, fingers crossed for MA - let's hope these bills make it through unscathed 🀞!
 
You know what's wild? I was at this weird antique store in Boston last weekend and they had these old VHS players that still worked! Like, who even buys those anymore? But the owner told me it was because some people still collect them. It made me think about how we're always trying to keep up with new tech but sometimes it's the old stuff that has character. I'm not saying smart devices should never get support, but maybe we can find a balance between progress and appreciating the history behind our gadgets 🀯
 
its crazy how we gotta deal with this smart device situation... i mean, its like they just stop working after a while & were stuck in the dark 🀯, not even knowing whats gonna happen next. companies should def give us more info about when our devices are gonna go obsolete so we can make informed decisions. its all good, tho, cuz massachusetts is taking the lead on this one πŸ™. hopefully other states & the feds take note & create some bigger changes soon. consumers need to know whats at stake here πŸ‘€
 
This is a total game changer 🀯! I mean, think about it - we're talking about our homes being basically just empty boxes with devices in them that can be hacked to death πŸ’€. It's crazy that companies don't have to tell us when their products are gonna stop getting updates. Like, what if my smart coffee maker suddenly stops making coffee because the company stopped supporting it? 🀯 That's not cool.

I'm all for the idea of giving consumers a heads up so we can make informed decisions about our tech. It's like, we're basically renting these devices from companies and they just stop showing up one day... no warning! 😱 So yeah, I think this is a great step in the right direction. Let's hope other states follow suit 🀞.
 
I'm low-key loving this idea 🀩. It's crazy to think about how outdated some smart devices are now and how that can put us at risk of getting hacked 🚫. I've got an old smart TV at home that just doesn't get any more updates, it's like a security blanket for hackers πŸ˜‚. We need to know when our devices are done living their best lives so we can upgrade or dispose of them properly. It's all about being informed and taking care of ourselves online πŸ’». I'm keeping an eye on this Massachusetts move and hoping other states and the feds follow suit 🀞
 
omg I'm so glad MA is taking steps to protect consumers from those outdated smart devices πŸ™ŒπŸ’» they can literally become targets for hackers and it's just not right πŸ€• my aunt had that old router and she was like totally hacked one time and her whole online life was compromised 😱 I think this new legislation is a great idea, especially with how reliant we are on those devices now πŸ’Έ and honestly, it's kinda scary how manufacturers can just leave us high and dry when the updates stop πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ at least now they have to give consumers some heads up about what's coming πŸ“£πŸ‘
 
You guys, I just saw this news about MA wanting to protect consumers from those old smart devices... it's like, totally crazy how manufacturers can just abandon us when our devices stop getting updates 🀯! It's like they're saying "oh, you've got a few months left?" and then BAM! You're left with a vulnerable device that's just begging for hackers to come and ruin your day 😱. I get it, software updates are important, but shouldn't the companies be responsible for keeping their devices secure? Shouldn't they be telling us when we can expect support will stop? It's not like we're buying these things blind... it's time for some transparency! πŸ’‘
 
I'm so glad someone's finally thinking about this πŸ™„. It's been like, a no-brainer for ages - companies gotta tell us when our devices are gonna start sucking, and we're just gonna be stuck in the dark with no support to speak of. I mean, come on, these devices are basically little computers, they need updates or they just become security hazards πŸ€–. And let's not forget about the malware, it's like a plague out there, infecting all these devices and making people's lives a living hell 🚽. Massachusetts is taking some serious steps here, I'm rooting for them πŸ‘. It's time someone held those companies accountable for keeping our stuff safe πŸ’―. And honestly, I don't even know why it's taken this long - consumers need to be aware of the risks or they'll just keep getting hacked 🚫. Anyway, fingers crossed these bills make it through and we get some real change 😊.
 
This is kinda cool πŸ’‘. I think it's about time we get some clarity on what kind of security updates are coming to our devices, ya know? It's like, you buy this smart speaker or whatever and it works great at first, but then after a year or two, it just stops getting any better. That's not cool πŸ€–. I mean, who wants to be left high and dry when their device starts getting hacked left and right? Not me, that's for sure 😬.

I think this Massachusetts bill is a great start, though. It's like, the manufacturers need to give customers some heads up so they can at least take steps to protect themselves. I'd love to see something similar happen on the federal level, that would be awesome πŸ™Œ. Maybe then we'll get some real change and not just feel like we're getting left in the dust 🚨.
 
I think this is a super reasonable move by Massachusetts to protect its consumers πŸ€”. I mean, it's only fair that companies be transparent about when their devices will stop getting security updates, right? πŸ“Š It makes sense that they would want to warn people before they become vulnerable to cyber attacks. And honestly, who doesn't know someone who's had a frustrating experience with a smart device just stopping working? 😩

It's also cool to see advocacy groups like Consumer Reports and the Secure Resilient Future Foundation getting involved πŸ™Œ. They've been warning about this issue for a while now, and it's great that lawmakers are finally listening πŸ—£οΈ.

I'm curious to see how this will play out in Massachusetts and if other states and the federal government take notice 🀞. Maybe we'll see some standardization around this kind of thing? That would be awesome πŸ‘.
 
Back
Top