Mayor Johnson warms to revised curfew ordinance that targets teen takeovers

Mayor Johnson has expressed his support for a revised curfew ordinance aimed at preventing teen takeovers from turning violent, but stopped short of ruling out the possibility of vetoing the new proposal.

The revised ordinance, which was pushed through by Public Safety Chair and 2nd Ward Alderman Brian Hopkins, gives Chicago Police Supt. Larry Snelling the authority to declare a four-hour curfew in any part of the city with 12 hours' notice. This is a significant change from last year's snap curfew ordinance, which Mayor Johnson vetoed due to concerns about its constitutionality and potential for abuse.

This time around, Johnson says he has more confidence in the revised proposal, particularly because it includes provisions for holding social media companies accountable for spreading notices of teen gatherings that sometimes turn violent. He believes this approach will help prevent the spread of misinformation that can contribute to these violent events.

However, Johnson emphasized that a curfew is not the only solution to addressing youth violence and that he wants to make it clear that the city's investment in young people should not be limited to just a curfew. He also acknowledged that some residents have raised concerns about how the curfew would be enforced, particularly with regards to detaining or dispersing minors.

Alderman William Hall, who is co-sponsoring the revised ordinance and has been instrumental in changing minds on this issue, said he was moved by the story of 14-year-old Armani Floyd, whose death last year was linked to a violent teen takeover. Hall believes that the new ordinance is a better version than previous proposals and says it is needed to address the root causes of youth violence.

Despite his support for the revised ordinance, Hall also expressed disappointment with Meta, the parent company of Facebook, which has not come forward to address its concerns about being held accountable for spreading notices of teen gatherings.
 
πŸ€” So, I'm thinking... a four-hour curfew in Chicago? It's like, we've been over this before, right? πŸ™„ Last year's snap curfew was a disaster, and now we're just tweaking the rules again. What's next? A 10pm bedtime for all teens? 😴

And what about the enforcement part? How are they gonna keep an eye on all these teenagers without infringing on their rights? It sounds like a slippery slope to me. 🚨 I'm not convinced that this revised ordinance is the answer to our youth violence problems.

I also don't get why Meta isn't stepping up and addressing its concerns. It's not like they're just going to sit back and let some city council dude tell them how to run their platform? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Come on, guys, step up and show us you care about the safety of these teens! πŸ’¬
 
OMG, I'm so down for a curfew in Chicago that makes sense 🀯! It's crazy how those violent takeovers can happen and spread like wildfire on social media 😱. But at the same time, I feel bad for the teens who are caught up in it all - they're just trying to hang out and have fun πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. The part about holding social media companies accountable is a major win πŸŽ‰! We need more people speaking out against the spread of misinformation online. As for enforcement, I'm sure there will be some teething issues but I trust that the city's got this πŸ‘. Can we pls just get more support and resources for our young people instead of just a curfew?
 
I'm still not convinced about this new curfew ordinance πŸ€”. I get that it's a step in the right direction to prevent violent teen takeovers, but 4 hours is a pretty long time for a curfew 😩. What if someone needs to be at work or school during that time? It just feels like another example of the city trying to control every aspect of our lives πŸ™„. And what's with the hold on Meta? They're basically the ones responsible for spreading those notices in the first place πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. Why should they be held accountable and not the cities themselves? It just seems like a bit of a free pass 😊. I wish the city would focus more on addressing the root causes of youth violence instead of slapping Band-Aids on it πŸ’‰.
 
I'm skeptical about this revised curfew ordinance πŸ€”. While I get what Mayor Johnson and Alderman Hopkins are trying to do – keep teens safe – I think it's still a pretty broad brush stroke 🧹. We need to consider how this will be enforced, especially when it comes to detaining or dispersing minors 😬. And what about the fact that social media companies aren't even acknowledging their role in spreading misinformation about teen gatherings? Meta should at least acknowledge their concerns πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. I'm not saying a curfew is never needed, but we need more nuance than just throwing up a new ordinance πŸ“.
 
This curfew thingy needs to get a bit more thought out, you feel? Like, we can't just slap a curfew on kids without thinking it through πŸ€” #CurfewConundrum. Mayor Johnson is right that social media companies gotta be held accountable for spreading misinformation, but what about the logistics of enforcing this whole thing? How are they gonna make sure it doesn't end up being another one of those discriminatory thingies where certain groups get targeted more than others? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ #SocialMediaAccountability. And btw, we can't just focus on curfews, like, there gotta be more support for youth programs and stuff to help them channel their energy into something positive πŸ’ͺ #YouthSupportMatters.
 
πŸ€” I'm kinda split on this one, you know? On one hand, it's a good idea to crack down on these violent takeovers and keep our teens safe 🌟. But at the same time, I don't wanna be that dude who starts regulating social media like Big Brother 😬. Like, shouldn't Meta just have some integrity and come forward with its own solutions? And what about free speech, bruh?

It's all about finding that balance, you feel me? We need to keep our youth safe, but we also don't wanna stifle their creativity or freedom of expression 🎨. Maybe instead of a curfew, we should be investing more in community programs and mental health services for teens πŸ’–? That way, we're addressing the root causes of this stuff, rather than just slapping on some band-aid solutions πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ.

And can we talk about how this is all kinda like that scene from "The Breakfast Club" where Claire Standish is like "I'm not a bully"? Same vibe, but instead of bullies, it's teens getting caught up in these violent situations πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.
 
πŸ€” I think Mayor Johnson's willingness to revisit the curfew proposal is a good sign... but at the same time, isn't it kinda ironic that social media companies are still getting away scot-free? πŸ™„ Like, if they're not gonna take responsibility for spreading misinformation, how can we trust them to help prevent violent events? πŸ’¬ And what's up with Alderman Hall trying to hold Meta accountable, but not the other big players like Instagram and TikTok? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It feels like a case of "pickin' on the little guy" πŸ˜’
 
I don't get why they have to make a curfew so strict πŸ€”... like 12 hours notice? That's super long time... what if someone's life is in danger? Can't the police just go "hey, it's gonna be chaotic over here and we're coming" or something? πŸ˜… And I don't understand why social media companies have to get involved too... can't they just let kids hang out? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ And what's with Meta not doing anything about this? I mean, if Facebook's all about keeping people safe online, shouldn't it care about what happens in real life too? πŸ€”
 
πŸ€” just thinkin bout this new curfew proposal and it got me wonderin if we're really adressin the root cause of youth violence or just puttin a bandaid on it πŸ€• what about all the other factors that contribute to it like poverty, lack of access to education & resources? we need a more holistic approach not just some snap curfew 🚫
 
can't help but feel that a curfew might not be the most effective solution for youth violence in chicago πŸ€”. we should be investing more in community programs and education instead of relying on punitive measures. what if this new ordinance is just a band-aid, covering up the real issues? πŸ’‰
 
I think it's a bit confusing when people say "teen takeovers" - shouldn't it be "teen takeovers" or "takeovers by teens"? Either way, the issue at hand is serious and needs attention πŸ€”. I'm glad Mayor Johnson is taking steps to address youth violence, but it's also important that we're having these conversations about how curfews are enforced - what happens when minors get detained? It's all about finding a balance between keeping people safe and respecting their rights πŸ™. And yeah, Meta needs to step up and take responsibility for its role in spreading information that can lead to violence 🚫.
 
I'm totally down with a 4-hour curfew if it means keeping our teens safe. I've seen those takeovers go wild and crazy, especially on socials... 🀯 It's like they're trying to outsmart the cops! Holding social media companies accountable is a genius move, though. I mean, who wants their platform to be used for that stuff? πŸ“±πŸ’»

But, I get what Alderman Hall is saying - this ain't just about curfew. We need more support for our youth programs and job training, education... the whole nine yards! 🎯 It's not just about throwing a curfew at the problem; we gotta address the root cause.

And, c'mon Meta! Come on outta that shell, man! πŸ’ͺ You're a major player in this, and it's time to own up to your responsibilities. We can't just leave it up to the city to handle... that's not how it works! 🚫
 
Back
Top