Pro-colonialism talking points get a boost from top Trump aide Stephen Miller

US President Donald Trump's administration has sparked a surge of pro-colonialist rhetoric within the White House and the broader MAGA movement, with top aide Stephen Miller particularly vocal in his views.

Miller recently penned an essay on X, describing the West's dissolution of its empires and colonies as a form of "reverse colonization," where taxpayer-funded aid is sent to former territories despite their increasing wealth and success. The author also suggested that neoliberalism has been a long-standing self-punishment for countries that built the modern world.

However, this perspective on colonialism appears at odds with mainstream scholarship, which views colonialism as an exercise of external control over a country or territory by another nation or power. Imperialism, on the other hand, implies a hands-off approach, where the dominant nation allows the subjugated entity to govern itself.

Despite this, some prominent figures within the MAGA movement have begun to publicly endorse a form of interventionism that echoes colonialist sentiments. Conservative commentator Jesse Kelly has written about the benefits of colonization, stating that it brought prosperity to underdeveloped regions.

Elon Musk and Lauren Chen, who is close to Trump, have also expressed admiration for the effects of colonialism on developing nations. They suggest that countries like Venezuela are poor due to their inability to harness their own resources, rather than being victims of Western exploitation.

Meanwhile, some Republicans in Congress, including Rep. Thomas Massie, have questioned whether Trump's actions in Venezuela align with his "America First" platform, particularly at a time when Americans are struggling financially. However, Trump remains confident that his base will support him, stating that MAGA loves what he is doing and that the movement is essentially himself.

US officials are currently working closely with Delcy Rodriguez, the onetime ally of former Venezuelan President Maduro, to administer the country. This development has drawn comparisons to a long history of American presidents backing Latin American leaders who are willing to bend to US will.

Overall, it appears that Trump's administration is embracing a form of colonialism that prioritizes resource extraction and regime change over traditional notions of sovereignty and self-determination. As one expert notes, the US does not intend to annex countries like Iraq or Afghanistan, but rather to install leaders who serve its interests.
 
πŸ˜” this kinda stuff is really worrisome, you know? it's like they're trying to justify some pretty shady stuff by saying that "the West built the modern world" and now we're just trying to take care of our own investments πŸ€‘ but what about all the people who actually lived in those places first? shouldn't their voices be heard too? πŸ—£οΈ it feels like a total erasure of history and the struggles of marginalized communities... ugh, just thinking about it is making me really anxious 😬
 
I just can't help feeling like we're back in the day when our politicians were all about expansion and manifest destiny πŸ™„. I mean, remember when America was first building its empire? It was all about bringing "civilization" to those so-called "backward" countries... Fast forward to today, and it seems like Trump's crew is trying to revive that same colonialist vibe πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. Newsflash: just because we're not directly annexing anyone doesn't mean we're not still exerting our influence! And let's be real, who benefits from this kind of "interventionism"? Not the Venezuelan people, that's for sure πŸ˜’.

And what really gets my goat is when people try to spin this as some kind of benevolent act πŸ™„. I mean, come on, we're talking about regime change and resource extraction here... that's not exactly the same as bringing a new light to the world πŸ’‘. We used to talk about "spreading democracy" and all that jazz... now it just seems like more like good old-fashioned imperialism πŸ‘Š. Can't we do better than this? πŸ€”
 
🀣 So Trump's crew is talking about "reverse colonization" now? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Like, they're blaming the West for sending aid to places that didn't want it in the first place? That's like saying you got robbed and then accusing the police of being thieves too. πŸ˜‚ And what's with these folks who think colonization is cool? Elon Musk and Lauren Chen are basically saying that Venezuela's poverty is because they're not good at running their own country, which is just a load of BS 🀑. I mean, we've seen some crazy stuff in the Trump administration, but this "colonialism" thing takes the cake. Or should I say, it takes the Venezuela... πŸ˜‚
 
I'm not sure about this whole colonialist thing... it sounds kinda messed up πŸ€”. I mean, if we're talking about a country being able to govern itself, that's one thing, but when you have someone trying to take control and dictate how things should be done... that doesn't seem right at all 😐. I guess what bothers me is that some people are actually saying it was good for those underdeveloped regions πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. Can't we just help each other out instead of trying to "help" them? πŸ’•
 
πŸ€” I'm low-key worried about where Trump's going with this whole MAGA thing. It feels like they're trying to rewrite history and spin colonialism in a way that benefits them. Newsflash: saying it's "reverse colonization" doesn't make it true πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. The facts just aren't there. And Elon Musk and Lauren Chen can't be serious when they say countries are poor because of their own lack of resources... it's like, hello, imperialism is a real thing and it's not something to be celebrated πŸ˜’. Trump's got this whole "America First" vibe down pat, but at what cost? It's all about serving the US interests no matter what πŸ’Έ. The Republicans in Congress are right to question his actions, though πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. It's gonna be interesting to see how this all plays out πŸ‘€.
 
I'm totally freaking out about this news 🀯... Like, what's going on with Trump's admin?! They're basically spewing colonialist rhetoric and it's just so worrying πŸ’”. I mean, isn't that like the exact opposite of what we're trying to do in the world right now? We're all about promoting equality and self-determination for everyone 🌎.

And what's up with this whole "reverse colonization" thing? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It sounds like a total non-starter. I mean, I get that they're trying to defend their actions, but this just comes off as so condescending and entitled πŸ˜’.

I'm also super confused by some of the people who are actually endorsing colonialist sentiments πŸ€”. Like, what's wrong with these folks? Don't they remember all the harm that colonialism has caused throughout history? πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ

It's just so frustrating to see this kind of thinking from people in power πŸ’ͺ. I wish we could have a more nuanced conversation about these issues instead of resorting to simplistic, outdated rhetoric πŸ’­.

Anyway, I'm going to go and reorganize my digital files now because all this news has got me totally off track πŸ—‚οΈ...
 
What a total joke 🀣 Trump's people are literally saying colonialism is good now? Like what even is that? They're just regurgitating some tired old BS about how the West dissolving empires was some kind of punishment for neoliberalism... Newsflash: that's not how it works, guys! The US has been propping up weak regimes and exploiting resources for centuries, but they're trying to spin this as some noble cause now? Give me a break πŸ™„ And what's with all the love for Venezuela? I mean, come on, everyone knows Maduro is a total disaster 🀯. It's just more of the same old US imperialism, and Trump thinks he can get away with it because his base will support him? Please, man... He's got some major 'splainin' to do πŸ˜’
 
I'm getting a bad vibe from this whole thing πŸ˜•. It feels like we're right back in the colonial era, where powerful nations just took what they wanted without caring about the locals. I mean, remember when our parents used to talk about how America was built by, like, brave pioneers who just went out there and settled things? 🀠 Now it seems like some folks are trying to recreate that same spirit of, you know, "civilizing" other nations. 🌎

And what's with the whole "reverse colonization" thing? That sounds like something our grandparents would make up in school history class πŸ˜’. I mean, we all know how colonialism really went down – it was a bunch of powerful countries taking resources and land from weaker ones without giving them any say. πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

It's concerning to see some prominent figures embracing this kind of thinking. I mean, isn't that just a fancy way of saying "exploitation"? πŸ€‘ And what about all the times we've been told to be independent and make our own decisions? Now it seems like some folks are okay with being told who to follow and how to live their lives? πŸ˜’

It's like they're trying to turn the clock back on all the progress we made in the '60s and '70s. You know, when we were all about equality and freedom for everyone? πŸ•°οΈ It's like they think that just because some people have more power and influence than others, it's okay to treat them unfairly. That's not how it works, guys! πŸ‘Š
 
I'm low-key freaking out about this whole colonialist thing going on in the White House 🀯. It's like, come on, guys, we're supposed to be all about that "America First" life, not trying to revive some ancient European power struggle πŸ’Έ. I mean, Elon Musk and Lauren Chen are basically saying that countries are poor because they're not getting enough Western help πŸ™„, but isn't that just a fancy way of saying "we're not doing our job"? And what's up with the Venezuela situation? It feels like Trump is trying to recreate some kind of colonialist empire, minus the whole " actual colonizers" thing 🌎.

I'm also super confused about why people are downplaying the whole thing as just a form of neoliberalism πŸ˜•. Newsflash: that doesn't change the fact that we're talking about a bunch of folks trying to exert control over other nations and extract resources without giving them any actual agency or autonomy πŸ’”. It's like, can't we have a conversation about how to help underdeveloped countries without resorting to this kind of tired, old thinking? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
Back
Top