US Faces 'Time-to-Power' Problem as Grid Struggles to Meet Demand
A growing energy crunch in the US has led experts to reveal that buildings could be the key to solving this pressing issue. The country's reliance on data centers, electric vehicles, and electrified heating is putting a strain on its grid system, which was not designed to handle such massive loads.
The problem is further exacerbated by wasted energy, with roughly 40% of electricity consumed in US buildings being lost due to inefficiency. To combat this issue, digital controls are being implemented to optimize energy consumption in commercial and residential settings. Schneider Electric's future North American headquarters at Winthrop Center in Boston demonstrates a model for achieving significant reductions in energy usage.
By utilizing occupancy sensors, automated lighting, smart HVAC controls, and demand-response systems, the building consumes 60% less electricity than comparable buildings. This approach not only reduces strain on the grid but also creates a pool of available power that can be harnessed immediately.
Experts argue that the technology behind these solutions is not futuristic but rather an extension of existing tools used in homes. The key difference lies in the scale and orchestration of these systems, which continuously learn how buildings are used to adjust energy consumption in real-time.
Commercial buildings are beginning to adopt this approach, with Boston University's Warren Towers set for a retrofitting project to transform it into a fully electric, net-zero facility. Similarly, hospitals like Penn Medicine have integrated building systems with operating room schedules to optimize ventilation rates and reduce costs.
The root of the issue lies in how buildings are designed, financed, and valued, with construction prioritizing lowest upfront cost over long-term performance. However, by shifting focus towards operating costs, resilience, and efficiency, the economics change, making digital efficiency upgrades an attractive option for building owners.
Financing options like performance contracts and shared-savings agreements allow owners to upgrade their buildings with minimal upfront costs, offsetting expenses through reduced energy bills. This approach could unlock significant capacity gains from existing infrastructure, rather than relying on new generation or transmission.
As the US grapples with its energy demand challenge, experts are highlighting that efficiency is no longer a sideshow but a form of capacity available now, hiding in plain sight. By optimizing energy consumption in buildings, policymakers can address this pressing issue without relying solely on new infrastructure developments.
A growing energy crunch in the US has led experts to reveal that buildings could be the key to solving this pressing issue. The country's reliance on data centers, electric vehicles, and electrified heating is putting a strain on its grid system, which was not designed to handle such massive loads.
The problem is further exacerbated by wasted energy, with roughly 40% of electricity consumed in US buildings being lost due to inefficiency. To combat this issue, digital controls are being implemented to optimize energy consumption in commercial and residential settings. Schneider Electric's future North American headquarters at Winthrop Center in Boston demonstrates a model for achieving significant reductions in energy usage.
By utilizing occupancy sensors, automated lighting, smart HVAC controls, and demand-response systems, the building consumes 60% less electricity than comparable buildings. This approach not only reduces strain on the grid but also creates a pool of available power that can be harnessed immediately.
Experts argue that the technology behind these solutions is not futuristic but rather an extension of existing tools used in homes. The key difference lies in the scale and orchestration of these systems, which continuously learn how buildings are used to adjust energy consumption in real-time.
Commercial buildings are beginning to adopt this approach, with Boston University's Warren Towers set for a retrofitting project to transform it into a fully electric, net-zero facility. Similarly, hospitals like Penn Medicine have integrated building systems with operating room schedules to optimize ventilation rates and reduce costs.
The root of the issue lies in how buildings are designed, financed, and valued, with construction prioritizing lowest upfront cost over long-term performance. However, by shifting focus towards operating costs, resilience, and efficiency, the economics change, making digital efficiency upgrades an attractive option for building owners.
Financing options like performance contracts and shared-savings agreements allow owners to upgrade their buildings with minimal upfront costs, offsetting expenses through reduced energy bills. This approach could unlock significant capacity gains from existing infrastructure, rather than relying on new generation or transmission.
As the US grapples with its energy demand challenge, experts are highlighting that efficiency is no longer a sideshow but a form of capacity available now, hiding in plain sight. By optimizing energy consumption in buildings, policymakers can address this pressing issue without relying solely on new infrastructure developments.
The problem with outdated infrastructure and inefficient building practices is like the opposition party's inability to come together and offer a united front - it just makes things harder. But, you know what? I think the tech-savvy solution here, with digital controls and smart buildings, is like a bipartisan compromise - it works! 
The key is to prioritize efficiency over cheap upfront costs, just like how we need to focus on long-term growth rather than short-term gains. And let's be real, if we can get commercial buildings to adopt this approach, we might just see a shift in the way policymakers think about energy policy - it's time to power up! 
. Have you seen those occupancy sensors in commercial buildings? Genius! We need more of that in residential areas too! 
. So, buildings are basically the answer now? 
. We've been so focused on getting new infrastructure built instead of optimizing what we already have.
. I mean, it's not like this technology is futuristic or anything - it's just taking existing tools and scaling them up 
. And the fact that it's paying off financially is huge 
️.
. And Penn Medicine integrating their building systems with operating room schedules? That's genius 
.
it's literally changing the game for energy efficiency! 60% less electricity is insane 
that's some next-level thinking right there 
the root of the issue is how buildings are designed, financed, and valued, but by shifting focus towards operating costs, resilience, and efficiency... it's like a total game-changer 
it makes sense to upgrade with minimal upfront costs and offset expenses through reduced energy bills 
But on a more positive note, Schneider Electric's new HQ in Boston is showing us what we can do with smart controls and sensors. It's not rocket science, just optimizing energy usage like we would at home 
! Performance contracts and shared-savings agreements are a game-changer for financing upgrades too... now if only policymakers could see the potential 
. The scale is huge, but with smart tech like occupancy sensors and demand-response systems, they can get way more efficient. It's not rocket science, just some clever design changes 
.
no, we gotta get smart 
with things like occupancy sensors and demand-response systems 
the US grid is really struggling to keep up with all these new gadgets and gizmos 
but digital controls are starting to make a difference with smart tech and occupancy sensors 
Boston's Winthrop Center is a great example of how it can be done right 
And don't even get me started on how little actual change we're seeing in terms of widespread adoption. It feels like all anyone wants to talk about are the fancy buildings and hospitals that are "going green" while the rest of us are still stuck with outdated infrastructure and crumbling grid systems. 
Can't we just have a real conversation about the systemic issues here instead of just glossing over them? 
... so why can't we just prioritize efficiency over cheap construction costs? 
. We need to rethink how we value our buildings and prioritize long-term performance over short-term savings 
.
. But if we can find ways to make energy efficiency upgrades an attractive option for building owners, that could be game-changing 
. The US is trying to rely on its grid system to meet the demands, but what's often overlooked is that this system wasn't designed with efficiency in mind 
.
.
. Its not like we need futuristic tech to solve this problem. We just need to scale up what we already have and make it work better 
