TikTok has settled a landmark lawsuit just ahead of its trial, joining the ranks of other social media giants Meta's Instagram and Google's YouTube that are facing claims their platforms deliberately addict and harm children.
The case centers around KGM, a 19-year-old whose use of TikTok from an early age allegedly addicted her to technology, exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts. She is one of three plaintiffs selected for bellwether trials, essentially test cases for both sides to gauge how their arguments will play out before a jury and what damages may be awarded.
Lawyers for KGM say the settlement does not mean TikTok is innocent; rather it's an acknowledgment that the platform has made no progress in addressing its design choices. The company remains a defendant in other personal injury cases, and the trial against Meta and YouTube will proceed as scheduled.
The outcome of this case could have significant implications for social media companies' businesses and how they handle children using their platforms. Jury selection is set to begin in Los Angeles County Superior Court, where 75 potential jurors are expected to be questioned each day through at least Thursday.
Experts draw comparisons to the Big Tobacco trials that led to a 1998 settlement requiring cigarette companies to pay billions in healthcare costs and restrict marketing targeting minors. The plaintiffs claim TikTok's design features are akin to those used by slot machines and exploited by the cigarette industry, aimed at maximizing youth engagement for advertising revenue.
The tech giants dispute these claims, arguing they have added safeguards over the years and are not liable for content posted on their sites by third parties. Meta has stated that blaming social media companies solely for teen mental health struggles oversimplifies a complex issue, while Google says allegations against YouTube are "simply not true."
The case is part of a growing number of lawsuits seeking to hold social media companies responsible for harming children's mental well-being. A federal bellwether trial beginning in June will represent school districts that have sued social media platforms over harms to children.
The case centers around KGM, a 19-year-old whose use of TikTok from an early age allegedly addicted her to technology, exacerbated depression and suicidal thoughts. She is one of three plaintiffs selected for bellwether trials, essentially test cases for both sides to gauge how their arguments will play out before a jury and what damages may be awarded.
Lawyers for KGM say the settlement does not mean TikTok is innocent; rather it's an acknowledgment that the platform has made no progress in addressing its design choices. The company remains a defendant in other personal injury cases, and the trial against Meta and YouTube will proceed as scheduled.
The outcome of this case could have significant implications for social media companies' businesses and how they handle children using their platforms. Jury selection is set to begin in Los Angeles County Superior Court, where 75 potential jurors are expected to be questioned each day through at least Thursday.
Experts draw comparisons to the Big Tobacco trials that led to a 1998 settlement requiring cigarette companies to pay billions in healthcare costs and restrict marketing targeting minors. The plaintiffs claim TikTok's design features are akin to those used by slot machines and exploited by the cigarette industry, aimed at maximizing youth engagement for advertising revenue.
The tech giants dispute these claims, arguing they have added safeguards over the years and are not liable for content posted on their sites by third parties. Meta has stated that blaming social media companies solely for teen mental health struggles oversimplifies a complex issue, while Google says allegations against YouTube are "simply not true."
The case is part of a growing number of lawsuits seeking to hold social media companies responsible for harming children's mental well-being. A federal bellwether trial beginning in June will represent school districts that have sued social media platforms over harms to children.