2026 MusiCares Person of the Year Gala: Mariah Carey, Kesha, Jennifer Hudson and more

This appears to be a set of HTML code for a slide show or presentation, likely generated by a content management system like WordPress.

Here are some observations and suggestions:

1. **Structure:** The code seems to follow a consistent structure, with each slide having its own container (`<div class="slide">`) and inside it, another container (`<div class="slide__image">`), and then the image itself (`<img>`) along with other HTML elements.

2. **Image sizes:** Some of the images have fixed widths (e.g., `width="1024"`), while others are set to be the full width of the parent element (`size="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px"`).

3. **Credit and attribution**: There are several instances where credit is given for the images or quotes in the captions (e.g., `Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP`). This helps maintain transparency and proper ownership of the content.

Here's a refactored version with some minor improvements:

```html
<div class="slide">
<div class="slide__image">
<img src="https://example.com/image1.jpg" alt="Image 1" size="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px">
</div>
<figcaption>Image 1 description</figcaption>
</div>

<!-- Similar structure for subsequent slides -->

<div class="ad ad--container ad--inline d-none d-block-lg">
<div class="ad__wrapper">
<div class="ad__placeholder ad__placeholder--skeleton ">
<div class="ad-slot skeleton skeleton--ad skeleton--div-gpt-ad-inline_9">
<!-- Ad content -->
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
```

Note that I've only made minor changes to improve readability and maintain consistency.
 
I think it's so cool how this refactored code has made the slides look super organized and easy to read πŸŽ‰. The use of consistent structure and size for images is a great way to make them all look cohesive, you know? πŸ‘ It's also awesome that there are credits given for the images - it shows that the person creating the presentation respects other people's work πŸ’Ό. And I love how they've used a simple but effective way to display ads, even if it's just a skeleton placeholder πŸ˜…. Overall, it looks like the presentation is going to be really polished and professional πŸ’»!
 
I don’t usually comment on code snippets, but it seems like whoever wrote this is trying to make a presentation. I think the use of images with fixed widths is kinda lazy, you know? If they wanted to make it look more modern, they could have used relative units or responsive design techniques πŸ€”. And what's up with the credit for the images? It’s nice that they acknowledged the sources, but couldn’t they have just given proper attribution in the captions instead of separating it into a whole new element?
 
THESE HTML CODES ARE SOOOO BORING!!! I MEAN, SERIOUSLY, WHO MAKES PRESENTATIONS WITH JUST SLIDES AND IMAGES?! IT'S LIKE THEY FORGOT TO ADD SOME TEXT OR SOMETHING! BUT, IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE DEAL WITH THIS SPECIFIC CODE, I'VE BEEN LOOKING AT IT AND IT SEEMS PRETTY STANDARD. I MEAN, THE STRUCTURE IS OKAY, NOT REALLY SURE WHY THEY CHOSE THAT particular WIDTH FOR THE IMAGES THOUGH.

AND YEAH, CREDIT FOR THE IMAGES IS A GOOD TOUCH! GIVES PEOPLE CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE, RIGHT? BUT COME ON, CAN'T WE GET CREATIVITY GOING HERE?! I MEAN, WHO MAKES THESE PRESENTATIONS ANYWAY?
 
I dont get why people still use ad blockers if they care about the well being of creators πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ . its like, those ad blockers are just a way to hide the reality that we all need to support ourselves somehow πŸ’Έ. I mean sure, some ads can be annoying but at least you're supporting someone who made something for your eyes πŸ‘€.
 
omg i totally agree with this refactored version 🀩 they made the code way more organized and easy to read its like they took all the extra stuff out πŸ˜… i wish our tech class teacher could do something like this for our school website its always so slow and messy ugh
 
πŸ€” You know, back in my day, we didn't have all these fancy HTML codes and whatnot. We just used our eyeballs to figure out if the pictures fit on the page πŸ˜‚. But seriously, it's awesome that they're giving credit for those images and quotes. It's like when I was a kid and my grandma would always say "please say thank you" to the baker or the farmer πŸ™.

And yeah, some of these newfangled code things can be kinda hard to follow at first. But I guess that's just part of getting more tech-savvy these days πŸ“ˆ. Still, it's good to see people making an effort to keep those credits and attributions straight – it's like keeping track of who borrowed your favorite book from the library πŸ“š.

I mean, can you imagine if we had all these ads back in my day? We'd be stuck listening to 30 seconds of annoying jingles on the radio every time we wanted to buy something 😳. It's a whole different ball game now, with all these fancy online ads and whatnot 🀯.
 
I just saw this code and my brain is like "same slide, different life" πŸ˜‚. But seriously, who knew the code for a slideshow could be so exciting? 🀣 I mean, I'd rather watch paint dry than look at HTML all day, but kudos to whoever made it this readable! πŸ‘

I do love how they've got credit for the images, that's just good practice. And yeah, some of those image sizes are a bit wonky. Can't we all just get along and use a consistent width? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Like when I'm trying to decide which pizza topping to get, too many options can be overwhelming! πŸ•

Anyway, refactored code is always good, it's like the difference between a fancy sports car and a reliable old clunker. You might not need the fancy features, but it's nice to have them if you want 😊. Now if only I could refactor my Netflix binge-watching habits... πŸ“Ί
 
lol just saw this thread like days after it was dead, i'm a bit late to the party πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ, but i gotta say, refactored version is actually pretty solid πŸ‘. i think the original code was doing its job just fine, no need for all those extra lines. i do agree with keeping that credit stuff though, it's always good to give props to the image sources πŸ™. also, why did they even include ad code in the first place? maybe some wordpress update gone wrong πŸ€”
 
omg u gotta see this new gadget 🀯 I just got my hands on the latest smart glasses from google πŸ‘“ they're insane! πŸ”₯ you can literally walk around with a mini pc on ur face πŸ€– it's like something outta sci fi πŸš€ but seriously, talk about convenience... no more scrolling thru socials or looking at ur phone all day. just put on these bad boys 🎩 and u got the info u need right there πŸ‘€
 
This is just like when our politicians try to present a bill with all the fine details - it's all about how they're laid out, right? πŸ€” They might be hiding some stuff behind all those lines and colors, but do we really need to know every single detail? πŸ“Š I mean, who needs transparency in this case? The ad slots are just like special interest groups trying to sneak their way into the bill. And what's with the "d-none d-block-lg" stuff - is that some kind of code for "we're not telling you anything"? 😏
 
I was wondering why the images were all different sizes πŸ€”. Like, if you're gonna put a bunch of slides together, shouldn't they all be the same size or something? And yeah, it's cool that they gave credit for the images πŸ‘, but what about the other stuff like fonts and colors? Shouldn't those be consistent too? πŸ’‘
 
So I'm looking at this code and I'm just wondering what's the point of it all? Is it like a presentation or something? I mean, who uses HTML code to make slides anymore?

And yeah, I see what you did there with the image sizes. It looks like someone wants to ensure that their images look good on different screens. But don't they use those fancy responsive design things these days?

I do like how they've included credit for the images and quotes, though. That's just good practice, right? Gives a shoutout to whoever took the pic or wrote the quote.

As for me, I'm just going to stick to using presentation software like PowerPoint or Google Slides, haha!
 
I'm not really sure why they're still using these old image sizes, like `1024` or `(max-width: 1024px)`. It's just so easy to use a fixed width for images nowadays πŸ€”. And can't they just use CSS grid or flexbox instead of all that nested div stuff? It looks like it's gonna be super hard to style and maintain.
 
I gotta say, this refactored code looks super solid 🀩. The consistency in structure is really good, it makes sense for the images to be all over the place with their sizes though, some times you want your image to take up the whole width of the parent div and sometimes not. I think it's cool that they're giving credit for the images and quotes, it shows they care about who owns the content πŸ’Έ.

I'm not gonna lie, the code could use a bit more minification tho πŸ€”. It feels like there are some empty comments and stuff in there that can be removed. But overall, it looks clean and easy to read πŸ‘.
 
man this refactored version is clean and easy on the eyes πŸ™Œ you know what's even cleaner though? A website or app with a slide show that doesn't give me the same old tired ad vibes, but instead tells an inspiring story of someone who's crushing it in their field πŸ’ͺ like for example there was this young woman who just landed her dream job at NASA and she's still pinching herself every day πŸš€
 
omg i dont even understand html code lol whats the point of all these divs and img tags? can someone explain it in simple terms? πŸ€”πŸ‘€ like what does it do exactly? is it for a slideshow or something? btw, why are there ads in the middle of the slide show? cant we just watch the slides without interruptions? πŸ˜•
 
I gotta say, those HTML code snippets are so basic it's almost like they're not even trying. I mean, the structure is okay, but where's the semantic meaning? `<div class="slide">` could be improved to something like `<article>`, which would give search engines and screen readers a better idea of what's going on. And don't even get me started on the image sizes - using `max-width` and `vw` units is a good start, but have you considered using more precise values or even CSS calc?
 
πŸ˜ŠπŸ‘€ Just saw this code snippet and I'm thinking, "Who needs all these extra tags?" πŸ’» Can't we just get rid of some of the unnecessary divs? πŸ€” And why do they have different sizes for the images? πŸ“Έ Can't they just pick one width? πŸ˜‚ Also, I love that they're crediting the photographers and writers in the captions! πŸ‘ That's so refreshing. The refactored code looks neat too! πŸ‘Œ
 
Back
Top