AIPAC's Big Donors Fuel Last-Minute Push for Moderate New Jersey Candidate
In the final days before a special congressional election in New Jersey, pro-Israel donors have poured millions of dollars into the campaign of Tahesha Way, a moderate Democrat who is competing against former Representative Tom Malinowski. The sudden influx of funding comes as part of AIPAC's efforts to support one of its own candidates and undermine a more progressive opponent.
According to an Intercept analysis, 30 donors to groups including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its super PAC have contributed over $50,000 to Way's campaign in the final weeks leading up to the election. On Friday, AIPAC's super PAC officially endorsed Way, providing her with a significant boost as she seeks to unseat Malinowski.
While some observers argue that this move could ultimately help AIPAC achieve its policy goals by backing a more moderate candidate, others suggest that it may have an unintended consequence: helping a more progressive candidate win the election. This theory is supported by a recent article in the Forward, which notes that pro-Israel donors may be trying to elect a more progressive candidate who can better represent their interests.
Regardless of the outcome, AIPAC's involvement in this election highlights the group's increasing willingness to support moderate candidates in order to advance its policy agenda. Meanwhile, Malinowski has faced significant opposition from AIPAC and its allies, who have spent millions of dollars on advertisements targeting him.
As the election approaches, it remains to be seen whether Way's centrist platform will resonate with voters or if AIPAC's efforts will ultimately lead to a more progressive outcome.
In the final days before a special congressional election in New Jersey, pro-Israel donors have poured millions of dollars into the campaign of Tahesha Way, a moderate Democrat who is competing against former Representative Tom Malinowski. The sudden influx of funding comes as part of AIPAC's efforts to support one of its own candidates and undermine a more progressive opponent.
According to an Intercept analysis, 30 donors to groups including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its super PAC have contributed over $50,000 to Way's campaign in the final weeks leading up to the election. On Friday, AIPAC's super PAC officially endorsed Way, providing her with a significant boost as she seeks to unseat Malinowski.
While some observers argue that this move could ultimately help AIPAC achieve its policy goals by backing a more moderate candidate, others suggest that it may have an unintended consequence: helping a more progressive candidate win the election. This theory is supported by a recent article in the Forward, which notes that pro-Israel donors may be trying to elect a more progressive candidate who can better represent their interests.
Regardless of the outcome, AIPAC's involvement in this election highlights the group's increasing willingness to support moderate candidates in order to advance its policy agenda. Meanwhile, Malinowski has faced significant opposition from AIPAC and its allies, who have spent millions of dollars on advertisements targeting him.
As the election approaches, it remains to be seen whether Way's centrist platform will resonate with voters or if AIPAC's efforts will ultimately lead to a more progressive outcome.
I just read this article about AIPAC's big donors trying to push for a moderate candidate in NJ and I gotta wonder... what's the point of all these donations? Like, is it really about getting someone elected or is it about controlling the narrative? 
Their efforts seem kinda like throwing money at a problem instead of actually listening to what people want. 
It's pretty eye-opening.
Maybe we need to rethink our whole electoral system...
. They're pouring millions into Tahesha Way's campaign and trying to make her sound like a moderate, but I'm not buying it 
. It just smells like they're trying to get a more progressive candidate elected who'll be all ears for them on Israel policy issues.
Either way, this election is gonna be interesting 
!
So AIPAC is like the ultimate "let's make friends" politician 
... by throwing millions at some centrist Democrat and hoping for the best 
Either way, it's been fun watching the drama unfold! 
. If AIPAC puts all their chips on her, maybe it'll help them achieve their goals... or maybe it'll be like throwing spaghetti at the wall and hoping some of it sticks 
.
Wouldn't that be like putting out a bunch of fireflies in the dark, hoping some will magically light up the path? 
.
So now we got these super rich donors from AIPAC pouring all this cash into Tahesha Way's campaign, and people are saying it could actually help her win because she's not as progressive as the other candidate? I think it's all just a game, folks. They want someone who'll listen to their interests, but really they're trying to pull the strings from behind the scenes.
And AIPAC's just playing both sides against each other. They're trying to control the narrative, and if that means throwing money at a candidate who might actually win, then so be it.
.
.
. It's like they're thinking, "Hey, we want what we want, but if it takes an unlikely candidate to get it done, then so be it 
. And can we talk about how much money is being thrown around? $50k from just 30 donors? That's like a small town's budget 
.
I mean, 30 donors giving her $50k plus AIPAC's super PAC endorsing her? That's a lot of clout. Some say it could backfire and end up helping Malinowski, but who knows, maybe people just wanna see some change and Tahesha Way is the face they want to vote for. One thing's for sure, this election is gonna be interesting... will the big donors' money sway the voters? 
but now with AIPAC throwin' its weight around, I don't know man. Tahesha Way seems like a nice enough person but her platform is kinda meh 
but come on, can't we just have some honest discourse about these issues without AIPAC tryin' to buy our votes 
! seriously though, it's wild that AIPAC is backing a moderate Democrat just to get a better deal for their own agenda 
meanwhile malinowski gets roasted by ads and now he's just trying to survive 
. guess we'll see how tahesha way's campaign goes, but one thing's for sure - these donors are bringing the heat (and probably some nice new suits too) 
, you know? I mean, AIPAC is basically pouring money into Way's campaign in the final days before the election, which just seems so shady. They're trying to sway the outcome of an election by backing a candidate who might not exactly represent their interests, but hey, it's all about getting what they want, right?
.
. However, I'm also considering the possibility that their efforts might inadvertently propel a more progressive candidate to victory 
. This brings up interesting questions about AIPAC's strategy and whether they're truly committed to supporting moderate candidates or if this is simply a tactical move to further their own agenda 
.
. I mean, think about it - if they want someone who's going to better represent pro-Israel interests, wouldn't they rather support someone who explicitly shares those views?