US democracy hangs by a thread as President Trump continues his assault on democratic norms and institutions, with experts warning that the country is on the brink of authoritarian rule.
A year into Trump's second term, the president has made significant strides in consolidating power, dismantling federal agencies, purging the civil service, and sidelining Congress. His administration has also deployed federal force in blue cities, stifled dissent, and targeted immigrants. The use of executive orders to circumvent Congressional oversight has become increasingly common, with Trump claiming that his actions are limited only by his own "morality".
The situation is grave, with scholars citing the US as a case study for how competitive authoritarianism can develop. Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt argue that the country has descended into this system, where elections are held but the ruling party abuses power to stifle dissent.
While some experts warn of democratic backsliding, others caution against overstating the situation or viewing it through a partisan lens. However, many agree that Trump's close relationship with tech billionaires and his appointment of Elon Musk as head of "government efficiency" (or Doge) pose significant threats to democratic institutions.
The erosion of democratic norms is not irreversible, but historians note that fatalism can accelerate backsliding. Scholars stress the importance of civic engagement, protests, voting, and supporting dissenting voices in contesting Trump's power.
Looking ahead, experts predict a worsening of Trump's assault on democracy in the lead-up to the 2026 midterms. The most recent Bright Line survey found experts increasingly worried about political violence following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Concerns also focus on the administration's aggressive response to peaceful protests and its push to gerrymander congressional districts.
Trump's fragile political standing and his growing disconnect from public opinion create an opportunity for Democratic opposition to push back against his policies and institutions. As Ben-Ghiat notes, "autocrats try to convince us that we're hopeless and helpless. That they're always going to be there, and there's no point in resisting." However, dissidents of repressive regimes know better, recalling conversations with Yulia Navalnaya about the US after Trump's return to power: "You still have elections... And you can use them."
A year into Trump's second term, the president has made significant strides in consolidating power, dismantling federal agencies, purging the civil service, and sidelining Congress. His administration has also deployed federal force in blue cities, stifled dissent, and targeted immigrants. The use of executive orders to circumvent Congressional oversight has become increasingly common, with Trump claiming that his actions are limited only by his own "morality".
The situation is grave, with scholars citing the US as a case study for how competitive authoritarianism can develop. Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt argue that the country has descended into this system, where elections are held but the ruling party abuses power to stifle dissent.
While some experts warn of democratic backsliding, others caution against overstating the situation or viewing it through a partisan lens. However, many agree that Trump's close relationship with tech billionaires and his appointment of Elon Musk as head of "government efficiency" (or Doge) pose significant threats to democratic institutions.
The erosion of democratic norms is not irreversible, but historians note that fatalism can accelerate backsliding. Scholars stress the importance of civic engagement, protests, voting, and supporting dissenting voices in contesting Trump's power.
Looking ahead, experts predict a worsening of Trump's assault on democracy in the lead-up to the 2026 midterms. The most recent Bright Line survey found experts increasingly worried about political violence following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Concerns also focus on the administration's aggressive response to peaceful protests and its push to gerrymander congressional districts.
Trump's fragile political standing and his growing disconnect from public opinion create an opportunity for Democratic opposition to push back against his policies and institutions. As Ben-Ghiat notes, "autocrats try to convince us that we're hopeless and helpless. That they're always going to be there, and there's no point in resisting." However, dissidents of repressive regimes know better, recalling conversations with Yulia Navalnaya about the US after Trump's return to power: "You still have elections... And you can use them."