"Las Culturistas" Podcasters Face Backlash Over Comments on Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett
Comedians Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang sparked ire among left-leaning fans after their remarks on the latest episode of "Las Culturistas," a podcast where they discuss pop culture, politics, and personal lives. During their discussion, Rogers said that voters shouldn't "waste" money backing Crockett, while Yang agreed with his statement.
Rogers later took to Instagram to address the backlash, saying he was taking all of the feedback to heart. He claimed that his phrasing was not right and apologized for any offense caused. Yang also reposted Rogers' message on his own story, adding a commentary vowing to behave more responsibly in the future.
Crockett, who has a history of making incendiary remarks herself, has been praised by some fans for her outspoken views on politics, particularly her criticism of President Trump. However, her comments have also drawn criticism from those who see them as divisive and unpatriotic.
The controversy highlights the increasingly polarized nature of American politics, where comedians and politicians alike face scrutiny over their words. It's a reminder that even well-intentioned commentary can be misinterpreted or used out of context.
Rogers' apology suggests that he is willing to listen to criticism and adapt his approach in the future. Yang also shows a willingness to learn from his mistakes, acknowledging that he should have been more thoughtful in his comments.
The incident may serve as a cautionary tale for comedians and public figures who use their platforms to discuss politics. While it's okay to express opinions, it's equally important to consider how those words might be perceived by others.
As the 2024 elections approach, politicians like Crockett are expected to face intense scrutiny over their views on issues ranging from immigration to healthcare. For those in the public eye, it's essential to walk a fine line between expressing one's opinions and offending potential supporters.
In this case, Rogers' initial comments may have been well-intentioned but poorly phrased. His apology and Yang's subsequent commentary demonstrate a growing awareness of the importance of thoughtful communication in politics.
Comedians Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang sparked ire among left-leaning fans after their remarks on the latest episode of "Las Culturistas," a podcast where they discuss pop culture, politics, and personal lives. During their discussion, Rogers said that voters shouldn't "waste" money backing Crockett, while Yang agreed with his statement.
Rogers later took to Instagram to address the backlash, saying he was taking all of the feedback to heart. He claimed that his phrasing was not right and apologized for any offense caused. Yang also reposted Rogers' message on his own story, adding a commentary vowing to behave more responsibly in the future.
Crockett, who has a history of making incendiary remarks herself, has been praised by some fans for her outspoken views on politics, particularly her criticism of President Trump. However, her comments have also drawn criticism from those who see them as divisive and unpatriotic.
The controversy highlights the increasingly polarized nature of American politics, where comedians and politicians alike face scrutiny over their words. It's a reminder that even well-intentioned commentary can be misinterpreted or used out of context.
Rogers' apology suggests that he is willing to listen to criticism and adapt his approach in the future. Yang also shows a willingness to learn from his mistakes, acknowledging that he should have been more thoughtful in his comments.
The incident may serve as a cautionary tale for comedians and public figures who use their platforms to discuss politics. While it's okay to express opinions, it's equally important to consider how those words might be perceived by others.
As the 2024 elections approach, politicians like Crockett are expected to face intense scrutiny over their views on issues ranging from immigration to healthcare. For those in the public eye, it's essential to walk a fine line between expressing one's opinions and offending potential supporters.
In this case, Rogers' initial comments may have been well-intentioned but poorly phrased. His apology and Yang's subsequent commentary demonstrate a growing awareness of the importance of thoughtful communication in politics.
. Bowen yang was super smart to repost rogers' apology and add his own thoughts too, that shows he's willing to learn from his mistake 
. it's all about finding that balance between expressing yourself and being considerate of others... these guys are already outspoken on politics so let's just appreciate their honesty 
I mean, can't we just agree to disagree without being super salty? Matt Rogers' comment was kinda harsh on Jasmine Crockett, but at least he owned up to it and apologized 
. Bowen Yang stepping up with a more considerate message is cool too 
. It's all about finding that balance between expressing your thoughts and not alienating people who might disagree 
.
, they can make mistakes. Matt Rogers was trying to say that people shouldn't waste their money on Crockett's campaign but clearly didn't word it right. It's not a big deal, we've all been there with our tweets being taken out of context 
. The real issue here is the polarized politics in America and how easily things can be twisted around 
. I think Bowen Yang was cool for owning up to his mistake and apologizing though 
.
. Their comments on Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett were likely intended to spark debate, but instead, they were seized upon by critics who felt disrespected by Rogers' flippant remark about not wanting to "waste" money backing her campaign 
. Yang's subsequent apology and commentary show a maturation in their approach, highlighting the importance of self-reflection and considering one's audience when engaging with politics 
. This incident is a poignant reminder that even well-meaning words can be misinterpreted or used out of context, underscoring the need for thoughtful communication in public discourse 
! On the other hand, I'm glad Bowen Yang spoke up and acknowledged his own part in getting roasted 
. It's all good, though - we've all been there where we say something we regret later 
. The thing is, when you're on stage or mic'ing live, it's hard to go back and edit yourself 
. As the 2024 elections get closer, politicians need to be more mindful of their words and tone because people are watching 
...and not just in a supportive way 
.
. He was probably just trying to make a point about not spending money on politicians who might not represent your values. And let's be real, Jasmine Crockett can be pretty divisive too 
. I think what really matters is how we respond to these situations - do we get all riled up or try to understand where the other person is coming from? 
Maybe it's because I'm not on the "cool kids" list yet, but I still think both guys should take a deep breath and move on from this drama... 
. Like, what does he even know about politics? It's just another example of how clueless some people are. And now they're apologizing and acting all sanctimonious? 
It just goes to show how careful we need to be when discussing politics online. We gotta consider not just our own opinions, but also how others might perceive them. 
. And Bowen Yang's response is like "oh yeah, I'll be more careful next time" 
.
and bowen yang agreeing with him doesn't make it okay either. that kinda comment can be super alienating to ppl who support jasmine crockett. i get that rogers apologized, but shouldn't he've thought about how his words might affect fans like her? anyway, hope jasmine stays strong & doesn't let the haters bring her down 
. it's all about being mindful of our words & considering how others might perceive them