FBI Raid on WaPo Reporter's Home Was Based on Sham Pretext, Court Filings Reveal
The FBI raided the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson in an alarming escalation of the Trump administration’s war on press freedom. However, it has emerged that the raid was based on a sham pretext, and court filings reveal that Attorney General Pam Bondi's decision to reverse media protections for journalists from having their records searched during leak investigations was a clear case of abuse of power.
Bondi's reversal of Biden-era media guidelines was made in response to criticism of the Trump administration’s actions over Venezuela. The administration had invoked the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans it claimed were members of the Tren de Aragua gang, an essential pretext as the Alien Enemies Act only allows for the deportation of citizens of an enemy government.
However, journalists blew a hole in the administration's claims when they reported on classified intelligence community assessments that most spy agencies overwhelmingly did not believe Tren de Aragua was coordinating with the Maduro government. In response to this reporting, Bondi claimed that leaks about the memo were "illegal and wrong" and made it more difficult to "keep America safe."
But court filings have now revealed that Bondi's pretext for reversing media protections was entirely fabricated. An investigation by Lauren Harper of the Freedom of the Press Foundation found that there was no evidence to support Bondi's claims, and the document declassified after her decision showed that the information could be released without making it any harder to protect America.
The raid on Natanson's home has been widely condemned as a clear case of harassment of journalists. The FBI claimed that Natanson was not the focus of the probe, but Perez-Lugones, who is accused of illegally retaining classified information, has not been accused of leaking the information he allegedly retained.
The incident highlights the escalating threats against press freedom in the US under the Trump administration's legacy. Every presidential administration classifies too much information, claiming everything from kitchen cabinets to foreign movies are matters of national security. The Trump administration is arguably the worst, claiming that even trivial matters should be protected under the guise of national security.
The incident also highlights the failure of Congress to take meaningful action to protect journalists and whistleblowers. The Espionage Act has been used to target journalists and whistleblowers in recent years, and it remains to be seen whether Congress will take steps to reform the law and prevent such abuses in the future.
As one journalist noted, "The entire federal government needs a refresher course: The public has a right to know what the government is doing and why; whistleblowers have the right to work with the press, even when the information is classified; and every American should be alarmed by the government claiming it has the right to raid reporters' homes."
The FBI raided the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson in an alarming escalation of the Trump administration’s war on press freedom. However, it has emerged that the raid was based on a sham pretext, and court filings reveal that Attorney General Pam Bondi's decision to reverse media protections for journalists from having their records searched during leak investigations was a clear case of abuse of power.
Bondi's reversal of Biden-era media guidelines was made in response to criticism of the Trump administration’s actions over Venezuela. The administration had invoked the Alien Enemies Act to deport Venezuelans it claimed were members of the Tren de Aragua gang, an essential pretext as the Alien Enemies Act only allows for the deportation of citizens of an enemy government.
However, journalists blew a hole in the administration's claims when they reported on classified intelligence community assessments that most spy agencies overwhelmingly did not believe Tren de Aragua was coordinating with the Maduro government. In response to this reporting, Bondi claimed that leaks about the memo were "illegal and wrong" and made it more difficult to "keep America safe."
But court filings have now revealed that Bondi's pretext for reversing media protections was entirely fabricated. An investigation by Lauren Harper of the Freedom of the Press Foundation found that there was no evidence to support Bondi's claims, and the document declassified after her decision showed that the information could be released without making it any harder to protect America.
The raid on Natanson's home has been widely condemned as a clear case of harassment of journalists. The FBI claimed that Natanson was not the focus of the probe, but Perez-Lugones, who is accused of illegally retaining classified information, has not been accused of leaking the information he allegedly retained.
The incident highlights the escalating threats against press freedom in the US under the Trump administration's legacy. Every presidential administration classifies too much information, claiming everything from kitchen cabinets to foreign movies are matters of national security. The Trump administration is arguably the worst, claiming that even trivial matters should be protected under the guise of national security.
The incident also highlights the failure of Congress to take meaningful action to protect journalists and whistleblowers. The Espionage Act has been used to target journalists and whistleblowers in recent years, and it remains to be seen whether Congress will take steps to reform the law and prevent such abuses in the future.
As one journalist noted, "The entire federal government needs a refresher course: The public has a right to know what the government is doing and why; whistleblowers have the right to work with the press, even when the information is classified; and every American should be alarmed by the government claiming it has the right to raid reporters' homes."