Top Republicans Vow to Counter Trump's Plans for Military Control of Greenland, Citing Bipartisan Opposition.
In a show of unity against President Donald Trump's push to take control of Greenland by force, Senate Republicans have made it clear they will strongly oppose any attempts at military intervention.
During diplomatic talks with Denmark stalled, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), part of a congressional delegation visiting Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on Friday, warned that the Senate would "provide substantial opposition" if Trump proceeds with using force. He made it clear that while some people in Washington are being cautious, those who continue to promote this idea should not be in office.
Mitch McConnell, chair of the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee and another member of the delegation, reiterated this stance, stating that using military force would irreparably damage US ties with NATO allies. He argued that Greenland's sovereignty is already sufficient for US interests, rendering any additional action unnecessary.
Not all Republican senators agree with their colleagues' views. Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) stated unequivocally that "Greenland and the Danes are allies" - actions like military force would be unacceptable.
Other Republicans expressed more cautious sentiments, urging diplomatic negotiations over coercion. Susan Collins suggested a peaceful resolution was possible, while Roger Wicker urged cooperation with Denmark.
Contrastingly, Greenland's foreign minister Vivian Motzfeldt broke down in tears after meeting with US officials, claiming that recent events had been particularly difficult for her and her team.
Trump has openly expressed his desire to exert control over the island through force, stating that if negotiations fail he would proceed with "hard" action.
In a show of unity against President Donald Trump's push to take control of Greenland by force, Senate Republicans have made it clear they will strongly oppose any attempts at military intervention.
During diplomatic talks with Denmark stalled, Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), part of a congressional delegation visiting Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen on Friday, warned that the Senate would "provide substantial opposition" if Trump proceeds with using force. He made it clear that while some people in Washington are being cautious, those who continue to promote this idea should not be in office.
Mitch McConnell, chair of the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee and another member of the delegation, reiterated this stance, stating that using military force would irreparably damage US ties with NATO allies. He argued that Greenland's sovereignty is already sufficient for US interests, rendering any additional action unnecessary.
Not all Republican senators agree with their colleagues' views. Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) stated unequivocally that "Greenland and the Danes are allies" - actions like military force would be unacceptable.
Other Republicans expressed more cautious sentiments, urging diplomatic negotiations over coercion. Susan Collins suggested a peaceful resolution was possible, while Roger Wicker urged cooperation with Denmark.
Contrastingly, Greenland's foreign minister Vivian Motzfeldt broke down in tears after meeting with US officials, claiming that recent events had been particularly difficult for her and her team.
Trump has openly expressed his desire to exert control over the island through force, stating that if negotiations fail he would proceed with "hard" action.
like seriously who does he think he is taking control of a whole country by force? and it's not just denmark either, there are nato allies involved here... i feel like we're seeing some pretty questionable stuff coming from the white house lately. 
. I think we should be working together with Denmark and the Danes, not threatening them 
. The fact that some Republicans are opposing this is a good thing - it shows they're thinking about what's best for everyone, not just Trump 
.
. We should be supporting her and her team, not making them feel vulnerable 
. Let's focus on finding a peaceful solution to this situation, not resorting to military force 
.
on this one. I mean, who needs diplomacy when you've got military might, right? 
Denmark's just gonna lose face if we go in there and take what we want by force. And let's be real, Greenland's already got some issues - the environment is a mess and they're struggling to keep their economy afloat. We need to step in and show them how it's done. I don't care about NATO or any of that - if we can get our hands on that frozen land, we'll make it work. And as for those senators who are all like "but what about sovereignty?" 
Sovereignty is just a fancy word for "we're too scared to take action". Trust Trump to know what's best for America... and Greenland 
I mean, come on, taking over Greenland by force? It's just crazy talk! The Republicans are finally speaking out and putting their foot down, which is about time 
. Thom Tillis and Mitch McConnell are being super clear that military intervention won't fly, and for good reason - it'll damage those NATO ties and whatnot. I'm glad some of the other Reps are being more measured in their response too, like Susan Collins suggesting a peaceful resolution. 
. What's the big deal about a bunch of ice and rocks? I mean, we've got enough problems with climate change and sea levels rising. Do we really need to be in charge of this too? And what's with all these Republicans who are suddenly acting like they care about diplomacy? It just seems like they're trying to save face after Trump made a fool of himself 
. I'm not buying it. Let's just focus on solving our own problems instead of sticking our noses into other people's business... and besides, have you seen those Greenland maps? They look way too complicated for anyone to actually control 
.
.
. Some Republicans are totally down with using military force, while others are all like "hold up, let's talk it out first" 
. It seems like Trump is gonna have some major opposition from his own team 
. And poor Greenland's foreign minister, she sounds super stressed out 
... can we just try to resolve this peacefully? 
... like, what's the real motive here? 
The Republicans are all about unity now, but let's be real, they're just trying to cover their own backsides. 
It's all about politics and power plays at the end of the day... not about the well-being of Greenland or its people 
I've lived long enough to see my share of wild dreams and unrealistic ambitions... Trump's plans for Greenland? 
. And Greenland's foreign minister breaking down in tears after meeting with Trump's people? 
it just seems like a big mess... rite? anyway back 2 the news, so some republicans r saying no to trumps plan which is kinda cool but also kinda surprising considering how much he likes 2 do things his way 
It's time for our senators to come together and show some sense of reason 
Like Sen Tillis saying they'll strongly oppose military intervention and I'm like YAAAS for that 
But then there's Sen Lankford being all about diplomacy 
i think it's crazy that some of our senators are actually standing up against him on this one, even if they don't agree on the best way forward. McConnell makes a point about NATO, but at the same time, I get why people would be worried about losing control over Greenland - it's a huge strategic location. 
But at the same time, I know some people in the Trump administration are really keen on this idea. 
And now our president is talking like some kind of cowboy trying to lasso Greenland? Give me a break! 
Susan Collins said that too, cooperation over coercion, I mean come on people let's think this through! 
... it's wild how much drama Trump is causing again. Can't believe some people think taking over by force is a good idea? 
.