Gov. Tim Walz orders weapons screening requirement at Capitol

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has signed an executive order requiring all individuals entering the state Capitol building in St. Paul to undergo weapons screening, starting from the first day of the 2026 legislative session on February 17.

The move comes after a recent advisory report recommended new security measures following a series of violent incidents at the Capitol, including the assassination of former House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, as well as shootings targeting two state senators. The violence highlighted the need for increased security, with Governor Walz stating that "government cannot function effectively when elected officials fear for their safety."

The order does not specify what types of screening will be in place, but it directs the Minnesota State Patrol to install equipment and train personnel necessary for the new requirement. The state Department of Public Safety will have discretion over the exact security measures to implement.

The Senate is also taking steps to boost security, with plans to require all members of the public to pass through a full-body scanner before entering the observation area above the floor where lawmakers gather to vote. Additionally, the Senate will ban firearms from being carried in the gallery.

While some lawmakers had called for more security measures at the Capitol, including a ban on firearms, Governor Walz's order has been widely praised by Democratic leaders, with House DFL Leader Zack Stephenson saying that it's "personal" and necessary to ensure public safety.

The move is seen as a response to concerns over gun violence at the state Capitol and comes after an independent review recommended new security measures. However, Republican lawmakers have expressed opposition to increased restrictions on firearms, including Representative Jim Nash and Senator Warren Limmer.

It remains to be seen how the new security orders will impact the public's right to carry weapons in the Capitol, with some groups, such as the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, saying they plan to review legal options to ensure that permit holders are not infringed upon.
 
You know, it's crazy that people need to be screened before entering the state capitol building just to attend a meeting... πŸ€” I mean, I get it, safety first and all that, but at the same time, shouldn't we be able to express our opinions and participate in our democracy without going through some kind of metal detector? πŸ’‘ It's like, what's next? Screening every single person who wants to attend a rally or protest? 🚫

And I'm not sure about this whole full-body scanner thing... it just seems so invasive. Can't we just have some common sense and respect for each other instead of needing to be scanned from head to toe? πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ What's the real reason behind these new security measures, do you think? Is it really just about safety or is there something more going on? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm all for this move πŸ™Œ, I mean who wants to walk into a place where someone's life is literally at risk? πŸ’₯ It's about time we take security seriously and make sure our elected officials can do their job without having to worry about being shot or assaulted πŸ˜•. Of course, it's gonna be a hassle for gun owners, but safety first, you know? πŸ™
 
Ugh, this is like something straight out of "Captain America: The Winter Soldier" πŸ€–πŸ’₯ where everyone's worried about security and it gets super intense 😬. I get it, though - you can't have elected officials fearing for their lives while trying to make laws πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. But at the same time, aren't we kinda like the characters in "V for Vendetta" who just wanna express themselves without all the drama and security checks? πŸŽ­πŸ”« I don't know, man... it's a bit of an uneasy feeling having to go through body scanners just to watch some politicians vote πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. Can't we find a happy medium or something? 😊
 
πŸ€” I don't know about this new rule, its kinda weird... I mean, I get why they wanna be safe and all, but can't we just have a metal detector or something? 🚫 I'm worried about people carrying guns, it's just too much for me. But at the same time, I feel bad for lawmakers who are scared to do their job. It's like, we need them to make laws to keep us safe, but if they're not comfortable doing their thing, how can we trust them? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ And what about people with permits? Will they still be able to carry their guns in the Capitol? That's a big question mark for me... πŸ€”
 
ugh i dont no about this πŸ€”... its kinda scary thinkin bout all those people goin thru security screening just to attend a hearing or somethin... but at the same time im glad gov waltz is takin action to keep ppl safe πŸ™ especially after what happened with melissa & her husband... its just unfortunate that we need to take such measures in the first place πŸ€•
 
idk about this, another state trying to make things more "safe" by restricting guns πŸ€”. like what's next? are we gonna have to leave our firearms at the door just to go visit grandma? i mean, i get it, public safety is important, but does this have to be so extreme? πŸ™„. and what about all the times when we need to feel safe from actual threats? shouldn't that take priority over some politician's personal feelings? πŸ’”. anyway, it'll be interesting to see how this plays out in court and how much of a headache it causes for law-abiding citizens who just wanna participate in our democracy πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.
 
πŸ€” I think this is a total 180 from what you'd expect when it comes to gun laws and public safety. I mean, you've got some lawmakers freaking out about the need for more security, but at the same time, others are all like "no way, we're not gonna do anything that might infringe on our rights." It's like they're caught in this never-ending cycle of, "we need to be safe" vs. "we can't let people carry guns". I'm not sure what the solution is here, but it feels like they're just kind of winging it. Maybe we'll see some creative solutions come out of this? Like, maybe they'll invent these security scanners that are so advanced, nobody even thinks twice about them being there? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I'm so worried about this πŸ€•. I mean, you can't blame them for wanting to increase security after all those violent incidents 🚨. But at the same time, I feel like we're losing some of our freedom, you know? Like, I get that guns are a serious issue, but do we really need to be screened every time we go to the Capitol? It just seems kinda... invasive 🀝.

And what's up with the Republicans opposing this? Don't they care about public safety at all? 😐. I mean, Governor Walz is trying to protect people, and that's something we should all be behind πŸ‘.

I'm also kinda curious about how this is gonna affect permit holders... will they still be able to bring their guns to the Capitol or what? πŸ€” It's definitely a complicated situation 🀯.
 
Back
Top