Gun rights groups are fuming over the justification offered by federal officials for the fatal shooting of Minneapolis protester Alex Pretti. Despite videos showing Pretti never drawing his concealed handgun or threatening agents with it, officials described him as a "domestic terrorist" and "would-be assassin". The only evidence cited to support these claims was that Pretti was carrying a gun, which he was legally allowed to do.
The government's characterization of Pretti's actions is at odds with the Second Amendment right to bear arms. Gun rights groups are pushing back, citing the constitutional protection afforded to protesters exercising this right. The National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America have condemned officials' comments as "dangerous" and "wrong".
Critics argue that the government's overreach is a worrying trend in the Trump administration's defense of gun rights. Despite claims of supporting Second Amendment advocates, the administration has taken steps to ban transgender people from possessing guns and defend federal laws targeting cannabis consumers who own firearms.
The NRA has called these policies "unjust", while President Donald Trump's stance on the matter remains ambiguous. The shooting of Pretti highlights the tension between gun rights groups and the government's increasingly restrictive approach to gun control.
The government's characterization of Pretti's actions is at odds with the Second Amendment right to bear arms. Gun rights groups are pushing back, citing the constitutional protection afforded to protesters exercising this right. The National Rifle Association and Gun Owners of America have condemned officials' comments as "dangerous" and "wrong".
Critics argue that the government's overreach is a worrying trend in the Trump administration's defense of gun rights. Despite claims of supporting Second Amendment advocates, the administration has taken steps to ban transgender people from possessing guns and defend federal laws targeting cannabis consumers who own firearms.
The NRA has called these policies "unjust", while President Donald Trump's stance on the matter remains ambiguous. The shooting of Pretti highlights the tension between gun rights groups and the government's increasingly restrictive approach to gun control.
. Carrying a gun isn't a crime, especially not when you're exercising your right to free speech at a protest. The fact that officials are already jumping to conclusions about someone's intentions just because they're armed shows us that our government is getting pretty shaky on its stance of protecting the Second Amendment.
We need to stand up for our rights and not let politicians play us like pawns. It's time for some real dialogue about gun control and how we can protect ourselves without infringing on each other's freedoms 
.
federal officials are literally trying to demonize a dude who just wanted to express himself peacefully & now they're going around saying he was a domestic terrorist lol what even is that?? 
gotta stand up 2 these crazy policies b4 they take away our freedoms 4 good 
just wondering how a guy can be labelled as a domestic terrorist for just carrying a gun? 
it's like, I get that protests can get heated but shouldn't we focus on the issue at hand instead of attacking people with guns? 
also, what's with the "would-be assassin" label? is that even a real thing anymore? 
. We should be talking about how protesters can safely exercise their right to bear arms without putting themselves or others in harm's way 
. This whole "domestic terrorist" label is just red flag alert 
.
. It's so easy to misinterpret things in the heat of the moment, but this just feels like a slippery slope. Next thing you know, they'll be labeling anyone who owns a gun as some kind of threat 
. And what about all those protesters who have been peacefully marching with their guns in hand? Are they just going to get caught up in the crossfire too? 
The Second Amendment is definitely important, but so is not jumping to conclusions and respecting people's rights 
.
. It's like they're trying to control everything, even what you can carry with you when you're exercising your right to free speech. I mean, come on, carrying a gun in public isn't the end of the world! My kid was involved in a school lockdown drill once and everyone freaked out, but we didn't think they were all coming after us 
.
.
. I mean, what's next? Saying someone who owns a gun at home is a potential assassin? It's all about controlling people's rights and freedoms 
. The government seems to be walking on thin ice with these comments, and it's only going to fuel more fire 
. Gun owners have the right to bear arms for a reason, and protesters shouldn't be singled out like that. This is just another example of the administration trying to strangle our freedoms 
.
, and yet we've got the gov't characterizing someone as a "domestic terrorist" just 'cause he was toting a firearm 
? The Second Amendment is ALL about protecting our rights, not just for hunters or collectors, but for protesters like Alex too 
. Let's get some real solutions, not just rhetoric... 
like, whats next? dey gonna start persecutin people jus cuz they got a different opinion on gun control? no thanks! 
. And now the gun rights groups are all up in arms (no pun intended) about it 
. Maybe this whole thing will lead to some real change in the way we talk about gun control