He helped create an NYPD unit to respond to protests. Now, he's calling for its overhaul.

NYPD Unit Under Fire as Former Official Calls for Overhaul

A former NYPD official who played a key role in shaping the Strategic Response Group (SRG), a unit tasked with responding to protests and demonstrations, is now pushing for its complete overhaul. Anthony Raganella, a retired deputy inspector, expressed his concerns about the unit's design, citing an inherent conflict between training officers to carry heavy weapons and facilitating peaceful assemblies.

Raganella's qualms date back to the SRG's inception in 2015, when he initially suggested that officers in the unit undergo extensive training at a specialized academy. However, the scope of this training was scaled back, leading Raganella to believe that the initial training was flawed, with too much emphasis on specialty weapons.

The unit's dual responsibilities have been criticized by NYPD oversight agencies and civil liberties groups, who argue that it creates an inherent conflict between responding to counterterrorism threats and facilitating peaceful protests. The Department of Investigation recommended in 2020 that the NYPD create a separate unit for responding to protests, citing competing responsibilities as a major concern.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani has campaigned on disbanding the SRG, and his administration is now exploring alternatives to the unit. While some officials argue that the SRG provides essential public safety services, critics contend that its design has created optics problems, including the use of military-grade weapons and paramilitary tactics.

Raganella's concerns are echoed by civil liberties groups, who have accused SRG officers of brutality while responding to protests. The department agreed to limit the circumstances under which SRG officers could be deployed to protests in 2020, as part of a settlement with demonstrators protesting the killing of George Floyd.

As the debate over the SRG's future continues, some officials and critics are cautioning against replacing one problematic unit with another. Raganella expressed fear that if the department is not careful, it may simply rebrand the SRG with a new name and maintain its existing structure.

While supporters of the SRG argue that it provides essential services for public safety in New York, opponents contend that its design has created more problems than solutions. As the city grapples with issues of police accountability and reform, the future of the Strategic Response Group hangs in the balance.
 
I'm low-key worried about this SRG situation ๐Ÿค”. It's like, they're trying to do a good thing, but their approach is all wrong. I mean, can't you just have a team that focuses on de-escalation and community policing? That way, everyone's safe and happy ๐Ÿ˜Š. But no, it's like they're stuck in this whole militarized police mindset, which only creates more problems. And now there are people calling for the unit to be completely overhauled? I think that might not be a bad idea ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. We need to find a better way to balance public safety with civil liberties. Maybe it's time to start from scratch and come up with a new approach ๐Ÿ”ฅ.
 
I think the whole thing is super messed up ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, can you imagine being an officer tasked with both keeping people safe and not scaring them into submission? It's like trying to solve a math problem while riding a unicycle on a tightrope. The SRG's design just doesn't add up. They're always talking about how they want to keep communities safe, but what they're really doing is creating an environment where people are more likely to get arrested for protesting than for committing actual crimes.

And let's not forget about the optics problem ๐Ÿ“ธ. When you're using military-grade weapons and paramilitary tactics against civilians, it's just gonna look bad, no matter how you spin it. I mean, even if they try to rebrand the SRG or come up with some new excuse for why it's necessary, at the end of the day, we all know what's going on here. It's time for a fresh start and a new approach to public safety that actually puts people first ๐Ÿค.
 
๐Ÿค” I think this whole thing is a big reminder about how important it is to critically evaluate our institutions and processes. We can't just keep things as they are because we've always done them that way - sometimes that's exactly what gets us into trouble ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. Raganella's concerns highlight the need for transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to something like law enforcement. It's also a reminder that public safety doesn't have to mean militarization or suppression of dissent ๐ŸŒŽ. We need to find ways to balance security with our values of freedom and equality. The fact that Raganella is pushing for overhaul suggests that he's willing to challenge the status quo, which I think we can all learn from ๐Ÿ˜Š. It's time for us to have a more nuanced conversation about what it means to keep our communities safe ๐Ÿ‘
 
omg u guys I'm literally shook about this NYPD situation ๐Ÿคฏ like what even is the purpose of the SRG if they can't handle protests peacefully?? ๐Ÿค” i mean I know they're trying to keep everyone safe but come on! using military-grade weapons and paramilitary tactics? that's just asking for trouble ๐Ÿ˜ฌ my heart goes out to all those ppl who've been hurt or traumatized by the police in the past ๐Ÿ™ can't we find a better way to resolve conflicts without resorting to force? ๐Ÿ’–
 
man this srug thing is giving me major vibes ๐Ÿค” like what's the point of having a unit that's supposed to handle protests but still ends up using heavy weapons and military tactics? it's all about optics you know? ๐Ÿ“ธ and yeah i get where raganella is coming from, but replacing one unit with another might not be the solution either...i mean wouldn't that just shift the problem around a bit? ๐Ÿ˜’ we need to think of new ways to address police accountability and reform without creating more issues down the line. maybe it's time for the city to start thinking outside the box ๐Ÿ“ˆ
 
I'm not sure why everyone's making such a fuss about the SRG. They just wanna protest and express themselves, and we gotta respect that ๐Ÿค”. But at the same time, I get where the officers are coming from - they gotta be prepared for anything. It feels like they're caught in this Catch-22. One minute it's all about keeping the peace, next minute it's about suppressing dissent. Can't we just find a way to balance both sides? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ The idea that one problematic unit is being replaced by another doesn't sit right with me. We need some real reform and accountability, not just a rebranding.
 
man this is wild ๐Ÿคฏ the NYPD's SRG unit is a total mess rn it's like they're trying to have it both ways - responding to protests and counterterrorism threats at the same time? no way that's just gonna lead to more problems than solutions ๐Ÿšซ. and now a former official is calling for an overhaul, which i think is long overdue ๐Ÿ˜Š. the optics are definitely bad with those military-grade weapons and paramilitary tactics... it's all about public perception, you know? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ what's worse is that they're not even considering a separate unit for responding to protests like the DoI recommended in 2020 ๐Ÿค”. maybe it's time for some real reform around here ๐Ÿ‘€
 
I think they should just get rid of it already ๐Ÿ˜’๐Ÿ’” It's like, what's the point of having a unit that's supposed to deal with protests but is basically just gonna end up clashing with people instead? ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, can't we just have regular cops handle those situations? ๐Ÿšซ And yeah, using military-grade weapons and paramilitary tactics is straight-up messed up ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿฝ๐Ÿ’ฅ Anyone who thinks it's okay to bring tanks to a protest is seriously outta touch ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ

And what's with the whole "public safety services" thing? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ I've lived in NYC for years and I've never seen any SRG officers actually helping anyone except when they're putting up fences or pepper spray people ๐Ÿ’ฆ It's like, we get it, protests can get wild, but do we really need a whole unit of special ops just to deal with that? ๐Ÿค”

Maybe instead of getting rid of the SRG altogether (although I think that's probably for the best), they should just break it up into two separate units: one for counterterrorism and another for general policing ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’ผ
 
I think this whole thing is super complex ๐Ÿค”. On one hand, you got people who say the SRG provides essential services for public safety, like keeping protesters safe from violence and counter-terrorism threats ๐Ÿ’ช. But on the other hand, there's a lot of criticism that it's causing more problems than solutions โ€“ like when officers use military-grade weapons or paramilitary tactics in situations where they shouldn't be ๐Ÿ’ฃ.

It's not just about whether the SRG is good or bad; it's about finding a balance between keeping people safe and respecting their rights to assemble peacefully ๐ŸŒŸ. I'd love to see some kind of compromise, like having separate units for counter-terrorism and protests, so each one can focus on what they do best ๐Ÿ’ก.

We should also think about the optics here โ€“ when you use words like 'paramilitary' and 'military-grade', it can give off a really scary vibe ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. Maybe we just need to rethink how we communicate with the public and make sure everyone's on the same page ๐Ÿ“ข. The SRG might not be going away anytime soon, so let's at least try to find some common ground ๐Ÿค.
 
THE NYPD NEEDS TO LISTEN TO PEOPLE'S CONCERNS ABOUT THE SRG!!! ๐Ÿคฏ it's not about replacing one unit with another, it's about MAKING SURE THE POLICE ARE TRAINED TO HANDLE PROTESTS AND DEMONSTRATIONS IN A WAY THAT RESPECTS EVERYONE'S RIGHTS!!! ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’ผ what's the point of having a specialized unit if it's just gonna lead to more conflicts and brutal incidents?! ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ‘Š
 
OMG I cant believe what's going on w/ NYPD ๐Ÿคฏ! Thats like so unfair for protesters who just wanna express themselves & have a peaceful march but they end up getting brutalized by cops with heavy machinery ๐Ÿ˜ญ. We need some real change & reform ASAP, not just another Band-Aid solution like rebranding the SRG ๐Ÿ“ฆ. My kid is always asking me about police accountability & I wish there was more clarity on this whole thing ๐Ÿค”. Can we pls have a better system in place where everyone feels safe & respected? ๐Ÿ™
 
I'm getting major vibes from this, it's like they're trying to sweep the same old issues under the rug ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. The SRG has always been a bit of a gray area for me - I get that public safety is important, but you can't just have one unit handling everything from counterterrorism to protests. It's gotta be more nuanced than that.

And what's up with the "rebranding" thing? Like, if they're not gonna overhaul the whole system, why bother changing the name? ๐Ÿค” That just feels like a PR stunt to me. The optics problems with this unit are real, and it's only getting worse as more people speak out against it.

The debate around public safety is so important right now, but I'm worried that we're still having it in terms of who gets to decide what constitutes "public safety". Is it just about enforcing the law, or is it about community trust and accountability? ๐Ÿค
 
omg u guys rnt blind 2 the fact tht NYPD's SRG is literally corrupt ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ! i mean, who thought it wuz a good idear 2 give cops heavy weaponry & train them 2 respond 2 protests w/ paramilitary tactics? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ it's like they r tryin 2 suppress ppl's right 2 peaceful protest! ๐Ÿ˜ก and now this ex-official is speakin out & i'm lovin it! ๐Ÿ‘ let's hope the mayor listens & disbands ths unit 4 good ๐Ÿ™๐ŸŒŸ
 
I'm thinking the NYPD's got to be really careful here, you feel me? They're not just gonna swap out one unit for another without figuring out what's really causing the problems. Like, if they disband the SRG and create a new unit, it's still gonna have the same issues - cops training for heavy-duty stuff instead of community policing. It's like trying to put a Band-Aid on a deeper wound, you know? They need to get at the root of why protests are getting so heated in the first place...
 
It's crazy to think that a unit like this even exists ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, who thought it was a good idea to train officers to carry heavy weapons and then have them respond to peaceful protests? It just doesn't add up, you know? The fact that a former official is calling for an overhaul makes sense - the design of the SRG has always seemed sketchy to me ๐Ÿค”. We need more than just lip service when it comes to police reform, we need actual changes that prioritize public safety over militarized tactics ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
I'm worried about this NYPD unit thingy ๐Ÿค”. It seems like they're trying to do two things at once, which is just gonna cause more problems than solutions. I mean, can't they just have one team that deals with protests and stuff? It's all about public safety, but also thinkin' about the optics of it all ๐Ÿ‘€. They're tryin' to justify this unit by sayin' it helps with counterterrorism threats, but what about the people who are just out there marchin' for peace and equality? ๐ŸŒŽ We gotta make sure our police officers are trained to handle those kinds of situations too, not just the military-grade stuff ๐Ÿ’ช. It's all about findin' that balance, you know?
 
Back
Top