The recent case of Roberto Carlos Muñoz-Guatemala, a Minnesota man convicted of assaulting an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer, may have shed light on the circumstances surrounding Renee Nicole Good's killing. A federal judge in Minneapolis was recently asked to order prosecutors to turn over training records and investigative files related to Jonathan Ross, the ICE agent who shot and killed Good during a targeted operation in January.
Good's death has raised questions about the tactics used by law enforcement officials, particularly those employed by ICE. In a separate case, Muñoz-Guatemala's defense team is seeking access to evidence that may be relevant to his original conviction. The defense argues that if Ross' injuries could have been brought upon him by his own behavior, this might impact the length of Muñoz-Guatemala's sentence.
According to court filings, Ross and other agents were attempting to interview Muñoz-Guatemala last summer when he accelerated away from their vehicle, dragging Ross approximately 100 yards. During the incident, Ross claimed that Muñoz-Guatemala had repeatedly deployed a taser before speeding off. However, an FBI agent who witnessed the incident stated that he did not hear this.
The defense team for Muñoz-Guatemala believes that if his original trial had taken place after Good's killing, his defense may have also asserted that Ross was the aggressor and used excessive force. The jury instructions in Muñoz-Guatemala's trial contained a two-part decision tree: jurors could convict him if they believed he should have known Ross was law enforcement or if driving away was not a reasonable response.
Prosecutors for Ross have thus far declined to comment on his current duty status or the status of any departmental review.
Good's death has raised questions about the tactics used by law enforcement officials, particularly those employed by ICE. In a separate case, Muñoz-Guatemala's defense team is seeking access to evidence that may be relevant to his original conviction. The defense argues that if Ross' injuries could have been brought upon him by his own behavior, this might impact the length of Muñoz-Guatemala's sentence.
According to court filings, Ross and other agents were attempting to interview Muñoz-Guatemala last summer when he accelerated away from their vehicle, dragging Ross approximately 100 yards. During the incident, Ross claimed that Muñoz-Guatemala had repeatedly deployed a taser before speeding off. However, an FBI agent who witnessed the incident stated that he did not hear this.
The defense team for Muñoz-Guatemala believes that if his original trial had taken place after Good's killing, his defense may have also asserted that Ross was the aggressor and used excessive force. The jury instructions in Muñoz-Guatemala's trial contained a two-part decision tree: jurors could convict him if they believed he should have known Ross was law enforcement or if driving away was not a reasonable response.
Prosecutors for Ross have thus far declined to comment on his current duty status or the status of any departmental review.