US Immigration Authorities Plan $50 Million Network of Detention Facilities in Minnesota and Beyond
In a move that has sparked widespread concern, US immigration authorities are planning to secure long-term detention and transportation capacity across five states, including Minnesota. According to internal planning documents reviewed by Wired, the network is forecast to reach beyond Minnesota's borders, allowing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to transfer detainees hundreds of miles away.
The proposed system would enable ICE to transport individuals detained around the Twin Cities at any time up to hundreds of miles away, with a focus on securing jail space and establishing a privately run transfer hub in Minnesota capable of moving detainees within a 400-mile radius. The project is expected to cost between $20 million and $50 million.
The plans have been met with opposition from local officials and civil rights groups, who argue that the deployment of such a network would be an "unprecedented invasion" of communities in North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Nebraska. In court filings, Minnesota officials and advocacy groups describe Operation Metro Surge as a "federal invasion" that has sparked repeated protests and clashes with federal agents.
The controversy surrounding Operation Metro Surge has spread beyond Minnesota, with more than 1,000 protests and rallies nationwide taking place over the weekend. The Trump administration is appealing a ruling by a federal judge that restricted the use of force against peaceful protesters and observers during the operation.
ICE officials have not commented on the proposal, but planning documents outline a nationwide expansion of detention capacity and a move to mega-facilities that can house thousands of people or more. A potential site for one such facility has been identified in Appleton, Minnesota, where a long-shuttered prison could be reopened with federal funding.
The proposal has raised concerns about the normalization of mass detentions and long-distance transfers preceding deportation. Local officials have expressed skepticism about the proposal, but it is unclear whether they would have any authority to reject it.
In a move that has sparked widespread concern, US immigration authorities are planning to secure long-term detention and transportation capacity across five states, including Minnesota. According to internal planning documents reviewed by Wired, the network is forecast to reach beyond Minnesota's borders, allowing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to transfer detainees hundreds of miles away.
The proposed system would enable ICE to transport individuals detained around the Twin Cities at any time up to hundreds of miles away, with a focus on securing jail space and establishing a privately run transfer hub in Minnesota capable of moving detainees within a 400-mile radius. The project is expected to cost between $20 million and $50 million.
The plans have been met with opposition from local officials and civil rights groups, who argue that the deployment of such a network would be an "unprecedented invasion" of communities in North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and Nebraska. In court filings, Minnesota officials and advocacy groups describe Operation Metro Surge as a "federal invasion" that has sparked repeated protests and clashes with federal agents.
The controversy surrounding Operation Metro Surge has spread beyond Minnesota, with more than 1,000 protests and rallies nationwide taking place over the weekend. The Trump administration is appealing a ruling by a federal judge that restricted the use of force against peaceful protesters and observers during the operation.
ICE officials have not commented on the proposal, but planning documents outline a nationwide expansion of detention capacity and a move to mega-facilities that can house thousands of people or more. A potential site for one such facility has been identified in Appleton, Minnesota, where a long-shuttered prison could be reopened with federal funding.
The proposal has raised concerns about the normalization of mass detentions and long-distance transfers preceding deportation. Local officials have expressed skepticism about the proposal, but it is unclear whether they would have any authority to reject it.