Atlantic City Casinos to Get Second Chance at Repealing Smoking Exemption Under State Law
A New Jersey state appeals court has ordered a lower court to restart its review of a case that challenges the exemption allowing indoor smoking in Atlantic City casinos. The decision came after the court found procedural deficiencies in the original trial, which had dismissed a complaint from casino workers and an antismoking advocacy group.
The 2006 Smoke-Free Air Act banned indoor smoking statewide but allowed it to continue inside casinos and their simulcasting facilities. However, the exemption has been a contentious issue for years, with the United Auto Workers union pushing to end it. The union alleged that the law unconstitutionally singled out casino workers to face the harms of secondhand smoke, violating their rights to safety and equal protection.
A lower court judge had dismissed the complaint in August 2024, but the appeals court found that the trial judge erred by using an incorrect test for weighing the constitutionality of the smoking exemption. The judge also improperly deferred to a casino-funded report that found banning indoor smoking would significantly reduce gambling houses' revenue, without considering alternative studies.
The lower court had relied on the casinos' study and failed to develop a fuller record of evidence before making its decision. The appeals court now has the opportunity to allow the record to be developed and litigated further before reaching an ultimate disposition on the case.
The implications of this ruling are significant, with thousands of casino employees potentially affected by the outcome. The workers had argued that the law was special legislation that did not apply to others in similar situations, but the appeals court declined to address this issue, leaving it for a higher authority โ namely, the New Jersey Supreme Court.
A New Jersey state appeals court has ordered a lower court to restart its review of a case that challenges the exemption allowing indoor smoking in Atlantic City casinos. The decision came after the court found procedural deficiencies in the original trial, which had dismissed a complaint from casino workers and an antismoking advocacy group.
The 2006 Smoke-Free Air Act banned indoor smoking statewide but allowed it to continue inside casinos and their simulcasting facilities. However, the exemption has been a contentious issue for years, with the United Auto Workers union pushing to end it. The union alleged that the law unconstitutionally singled out casino workers to face the harms of secondhand smoke, violating their rights to safety and equal protection.
A lower court judge had dismissed the complaint in August 2024, but the appeals court found that the trial judge erred by using an incorrect test for weighing the constitutionality of the smoking exemption. The judge also improperly deferred to a casino-funded report that found banning indoor smoking would significantly reduce gambling houses' revenue, without considering alternative studies.
The lower court had relied on the casinos' study and failed to develop a fuller record of evidence before making its decision. The appeals court now has the opportunity to allow the record to be developed and litigated further before reaching an ultimate disposition on the case.
The implications of this ruling are significant, with thousands of casino employees potentially affected by the outcome. The workers had argued that the law was special legislation that did not apply to others in similar situations, but the appeals court declined to address this issue, leaving it for a higher authority โ namely, the New Jersey Supreme Court.