meta's being super secretive about its shenanigans . like, come on, you're a giant social media company, can't handle some scrutiny? they're trying to hide all this juicy info about mental health, finances, and those AI chatbots... sounds like they've got something to hide . newsflash: your products aren't exactly innocent . btw, mark zuckerberg's college days should be totally admissible evidence , who doesn't love a good attractiveness-rating website?
"Perception is reality." The way Meta is handling this trial makes you wonder what they're really trying to hide. It's like they're saying, "the truth will come out in time," but for now, let's just keep some info under wraps... right?
I'm not sure I buy into all this secrecy from Meta . They're basically trying to hide some pretty big pieces of info that could impact how this trial goes down. Like, what's really going on with their AI chatbots and how they might be affecting kids? If it's something bad, shouldn't we know about it?
I mean, I get that Meta wants to protect itself, but excluding all this research on social media's impact on mental health just seems like a big PR move. And what's with the Mark Zuckerberg stuff? Is he really going to be an issue in this trial?
It feels like they're trying to control the narrative here and limit how much information gets out. I'm not sure that's fair to the other side or to the public at large. Can't we just have a honest discussion about the issues at hand?
meta's being super secretive about its shenanigans 
. like, come on, you're a giant social media company, can't handle some scrutiny? 
they're trying to hide all this juicy info about mental health, finances, and those AI chatbots... sounds like they've got something to hide 
. newsflash: your products aren't exactly innocent 
. btw, mark zuckerberg's college days should be totally admissible evidence 
, who doesn't love a good attractiveness-rating website? 
