New NYC schools chancellor plans changes to controversial math curriculum

New York City's New Chancellor Tackles Controversial Math Curriculum with Tweaks and Reinforcements

In an effort to address mounting criticism, the new Schools Chancellor, Kamar Samuels, has announced a revamped approach to teaching math in middle school and high school. The changes, part of the NYC Solves initiative, aim to ensure students grasp fundamental arithmetic skills before diving into more advanced concepts.

Under the revised plan, Samuels is pushing for "tweaks" to the existing curriculum, Illustrative Math, which has faced challenges in providing adequate foundational instruction. He emphasizes the importance of automaticity – recalling basic math facts instantly – and will work with educators and families to reinforce practicing these basics.

The new approach focuses on conceptual understanding, encouraging students to discuss possible solutions before modeling problems on the smartboard. This shift towards "productive struggle" acknowledges that students learn best through collaborative problem-solving and real-world applications.

Despite initial controversy surrounding the math reforms, there are signs of improvement. State test scores for third to eighth graders increased 3.5 points, with 56.9% of students scoring proficient. However, some teachers and parents have expressed concerns about supporting struggling students, particularly those with disabilities or learning English as a second language.

In response, Samuels has called on the education department to develop additional resources for educators and families. This includes creating supplemental materials to support teacher professional development and helping students master fundamental arithmetic skills.

The new chancellor's efforts reflect a broader shift in how math is taught. By focusing on conceptual understanding and real-world applications, he aims to create a more inclusive and effective learning environment for all students. As Samuels said, "It's really good work," highlighting the initiative's potential to transform math education in New York City schools.
 
math curriculum overhaul πŸ€”πŸ“ guess it's about time they took a shot at getting NYC kids proficient in basic addition and subtraction without having to Google it every 5 minutes lol... some teachers and parents are gonna love the extra resources, though - kudos for recognizing those students need a little more support 🌟. still think automaticity is key, but I get what Samuels is trying to do here - make math accessible and fun for all, even if that means making it a bit more collaborative 🀝. only time (and test scores) will tell if these changes actually stick πŸ’ͺ
 
OMG, 3.5 point increase in state test scores is lit 🀩! but I'm still skeptical about how this new approach will impact our kids, esp those with disabilities or ELLs... they need extra support too 🀝. Can't wait to see the supplemental resources and professional development materials that Samuels mentioned - fingers crossed it'll make a real difference πŸ‘
 
I'm not sure I agree with this new math curriculum overhaul πŸ€”... I mean don't get me wrong, it sounds great that they're focusing on conceptual understanding and real-world applications - my kid loves learning about how math relates to the world around them. But what really gets me is that some teachers and parents are worried about struggling students πŸ€• especially those with disabilities or learning a second language. Can we make sure we have adequate support in place for all kids, not just the ones who are already catching on quickly? I'd love to see more resources developed for families and educators so everyone has what they need to help their kids succeed πŸ’ͺ
 
Wow 😊, I think its interesting how they're trying to address the issues with the current math curriculum by focusing on automaticity and real-world applications πŸ€”. The idea of encouraging students to discuss possible solutions before modeling problems on the smartboard is a great way to promote collaborative problem-solving πŸ’‘. However, I hope they can provide more support for struggling students, especially those with disabilities or learning English as a second language πŸ“šπŸ’¬
 
I gotta say, I'm kinda stoked about this new direction for math ed 🀩. These tweaks and reinforcements are exactly what NYC needed - it's all about buildin' a strong foundation first, ya know? By focusin' on automaticity and conceptual understanding, they're givin' students the tools to tackle complex problems head-on πŸ’‘. And I love that they're embracin' 'productive struggle' - gettin' kids to collaborate and think critically is the way forward 🀝. Now, let's talk about supportin' those strugglin' students... we gotta make sure we're got everyone's back, especially those with disabilities or English as a second language πŸ’•. It's all about inclusivity and equity - that's what NYC Solves is all about!
 
πŸ€” I gotta say, it's about time someone shook things up in our math curriculum πŸ“. I mean, automaticity is key, right? It's like how I can quickly recall my PIN number without even thinking about it πŸ’Έ. The new approach seems to be moving in the right direction by focusing on conceptual understanding and problem-solving. It's all about getting those kids to think critically and apply math to real-life situations πŸ“Š.

But let's not forget about our struggling students, especially those with disabilities or learning English as a second language 😬. We need to make sure they're not left behind in the process. The fact that state test scores are up is great, but we gotta make sure it's not just because of better teaching πŸ€”.

I love how Chancellor Samuels is calling for more resources and support for educators and families πŸ“š. It's all about collaboration and making math education accessible to everyone πŸ’‘. I'm hoping this new initiative will help create a more inclusive and effective learning environment for our kids πŸ‘
 
I'm loving this new chancellor's move, but it got me thinking - why are we still debating how to teach basic math? Shouldn't our education system be about building a strong foundation for all students, not just those with the most resources? πŸ€”πŸ“š The fact that some teachers and parents are already expressing concerns about supporting struggling students is concerning. It's like, shouldn't we have more support in place to help every student succeed? πŸ’ͺ I think this new initiative shows a lot of promise, but we need to make sure it's not just a Band-Aid solution for our education system. We need systemic changes to ensure equity and accessibility for all students. 🚨
 
πŸ€” I'm still not convinced about this new approach... I mean, it sounds great on paper but how's it gonna help those struggling kids? πŸ“ We need more hands-on activities and small group work to make sure they don't fall behind. And what about the teachers who aren't exactly math whizzes themselves? They're gonna need some serious support! πŸ€“
 
Wow πŸ˜ŠπŸ“š I'm actually kinda surprised they're making these changes! I mean, it's about time they acknowledge that some of those old math methods weren't working for everyone πŸ€”. Focusing on conceptual understanding and real-world apps makes total sense to me - it's all about making learning more engaging and relevant to their lives, you know? πŸ’‘ And yeah, I can see how the "productive struggle" approach would help students learn better through collaboration... it's like, they're not just sitting there solving problems on their own, but working together to figure it out 🀝. It's gonna be interesting to see how this all plays out! 😊
 
I'm keeping an eye on this math curriculum shake-up πŸ€”. I think it's cool that Chancellor Samuels is prioritizing automaticity and conceptual understanding – those sound like solid fundamentals for any math course. I also love the idea of "productive struggle" where students work together to solve problems, it makes sense from a learning perspective. However, I'm still skeptical about how this will play out in practice πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ, especially with teachers and parents expressing concerns about supporting struggling students. Are these additional resources for educators and families going to be enough? We'll have to wait and see if this initiative really brings results πŸ“Š
 
I'm not sure how I feel about these new changes yet, but I do know that our middle schoolers are going to have to get a lot more comfortable with basic addition and subtraction facts πŸ€”. Some of my friends are worried that this is going to be too easy, that the kids will breeze through it without really understanding what's going on. But at the same time, if this helps them develop a strong foundation for future math classes, then I'm all for it πŸ’ͺ. One thing I do think needs to change, though, is how we support our students who are struggling 🀝. We need to make sure that everyone has access to resources and help, not just the kids who are already doing well in math class πŸ‘.
 
omg i'm so down for this new approach to teaching math 🀩! it makes total sense that they're focusing on building those automaticity skills first - like, who wants to spend all their time on complex problems when you can just recall the basics instantly? πŸ˜‚ and i love the emphasis on conceptual understanding and real-world applications... that's literally how we learn stuff in life, right? πŸ€“ it's about time they shifted away from just memorizing formulas and towards problem-solving and collaboration. πŸ’‘ fingers crossed it works out for all the students, especially those who struggle a bit more 🀞
 
OMG 🀯 I'm so stoked to hear that the new chancellor is shaking things up with this revamped math curriculum! πŸ’‘ The idea of focusing on conceptual understanding and real-world applications is SO on point πŸ™Œ. I mean, think about it, most kids aren't going to use those fancy-schmancy formulas in their everyday lives, but they will need to solve problems that make sense to them.

I love how the new approach acknowledges that students learn best through collaborative problem-solving and discussion πŸ’¬. It's all about creating a supportive environment where kids feel comfortable taking risks and exploring different solutions. And, of course, having more resources available for educators and families is a huge plus πŸ“š!

The fact that state test scores have actually increased with this new approach is pretty impressive πŸŽ‰. I'm not surprised, though – it makes total sense to focus on building those foundational skills before diving into more advanced concepts.

Let's be real, though... some teachers and parents are still gonna be a little skeptical πŸ˜’. But, as long as the chancellor is committed to supporting struggling students, particularly those with disabilities or English language learners 🀝, I'm all for it!
 
πŸ€” I'm so down with this new direction for NYC math classes πŸ“šπŸ’‘. I mean, it's about time we're focusing on helping those struggling students get a solid grasp of basic arithmetic skills, you feel? It can't be that hard to master the basics before moving on to more advanced concepts πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. The idea of "productive struggle" is genius - who needs rote memorization when you can learn through real-world problems and group discussions πŸ’‘? Just hope those teachers are getting the support they need to make this new approach work πŸ‘©β€πŸ«πŸ’ͺ
 
I gotta say πŸ€”, it's about time someone stepped in to revamp that old math curriculum πŸ˜’. I mean, who wants to be stuck on basic arithmetic skills forever? The new approach sounds like a total game-changer πŸ’‘ - focusing on conceptual understanding and real-world applications is the way to go, imo! 🀝 It's all about creating an inclusive learning environment where everyone can thrive πŸ‘.

I'm glad the chancellor is listening to teachers and parents' concerns, though πŸ—£οΈ. Supporting struggling students is key, especially those with disabilities or language barriers πŸ’•. The fact that state test scores are improving (3.5 points, woohoo!) is a good start, but let's not forget about providing adequate resources for educators and families to support our young minds πŸ“šπŸ’».

Can we get more of this kind of progress in education? 🀞 I'm all about seeing positive changes that benefit students everywhere 🌈!
 
im loving this new direction the chancellor is taking with the math curriculum 🀩! it makes total sense that they're focusing on automaticity and reinforcing those basics. i mean, who doesn't struggle with basic math facts from time to time? πŸ˜… but seriously, it's so important for our kids to feel confident in their ability to recall these facts instantly.

and i love the shift towards collaborative problem-solving! that's where the magic happens, right? 🧠 when students are working together and sharing ideas, they learn so much more than just individual concepts. plus, it's a great way to prepare them for the real world, where they'll be solving problems with their colleagues and partners.

i do hope they're able to develop those additional resources, though 🀞. i know some teachers are already doing amazing work with their students, but it's not always easy to provide extra support. still, i have faith in Chancellor Samuels and the education department to make this work πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm all about making learning fun 🀩, you know? I remember when I was in middle school, we used this super dry textbook that just made me wanna zone out 😴. But then my teacher brought in these cool puzzles and games to practice our math facts, and suddenly it wasn't so boring anymore πŸŽ‰.

I think this new approach by Chancellor Samuels is all about finding that sweet spot between being too easy or too hard πŸ€”. By focusing on conceptual understanding and collaboration, they're encouraging students to see math as a tool for problem-solving rather than just a series of formulas πŸ”.

Of course, I get where the teachers and parents are coming from – we need to make sure everyone's supported, especially those who struggle 😊. But I think this is all about leveling up the system, making it more inclusive and effective for every single student πŸš€.
 
Back
Top