One of the most expensive paintings ever sold once hung unnoticed in a Downtown hotel lobby

Gerhard Richter, one of the world's most renowned artists, has had a humble beginning - literally. For 15 years, his masterpiece 'Domplatz, Mailand (Cathedral Square, Milan)' hung in the lobby of Park Hyatt Chicago, a hotel that's more known for its sleek design and modern amenities than for showcasing fine art. The painting, valued at $3.6 million when it was bought by the hotel in 2000, caught the eye of few visitors and seemed out of place among the generic mass-produced canvases that are commonly found on hotel walls.

In a stunning turn of events, the painting was sold to an anonymous buyer for $37.1 million in 2013, setting a record for a living artist at the time. It's hard not to wonder who could have been interested in such a valuable piece and why it was traded in for another artwork, valued at a mere $1 million.

The painting that now hangs in the lobby is actually a work by Richard Prince, an American artist known for his bold style and unapologetic use of pop culture icons. The 'Not a Basquiat', as some of the hotel staff affectionately call it, has become a bit of a conversation starter among guests who, surprisingly, still mistake it for a work by Jean-Michel Basquiat.

This raises questions about the value placed on art and the decision-making process behind buying and selling masterpieces. Was it simply a case of 'one upmanship', where the buyer wanted to outdo previous owners in terms of prestige and value? Or was there something more at play?

One thing is certain, however - Gerhard Richter's 'Domplatz, Mailand' has finally found its rightful place back with its creator. It may be hard to believe that one of the most expensive paintings ever sold by a living artist once hung in an unlikely location like Park Hyatt Chicago. Yet here we are, pondering what could have been and what might happen next in this wild world of art sales and auctions.
 
I think it's kinda crazy how something so valuable can just get swapped out for another piece without anyone even thinking about the history behind it. Like, is the new buyer trying to one-up the previous owner or is there some other reason they wanted that specific painting? ๐Ÿค” And it's wild that people still mistake Richard Prince's work for Basquiat's - that says a lot about how art can be misinterpreted and devalued if it doesn't come with a big price tag. The fact that Richter's painting is finally back where it belongs is definitely a nice story, but it also makes you wonder what could've been if it had stayed in the hotel lobby all those years... ๐Ÿ˜Š
 
You gotta wonder who ends up buying these masterpieces for millions... I mean, the anonymous buyer must be some kinda collector or art aficionado, right? But it's weird that they'd trade a Gerhard Richter for a Richard Prince, considering the vastly different styles and values. Like, is it really just about prestige and one-upmanship? What if there's more to it... maybe the buyer was looking at the work in a specific context or moment and just wanted something completely new for their space? And can you blame them? The fact that people still mistake that Richard Prince for a Basquiat is pretty wild. It's like, who even knows what they're looking at anymore? ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
OMG ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, can you even believe that Gerhard Richter's masterpiece was just chillin' in a hotel lobby for 15 years?! ๐Ÿ’ก It's crazy to think about how little attention it got amidst all the other generic artwork ๐ŸŽจ. And then it gets sold for $37.1 million? That's wild! ๐Ÿคฏ I guess you could say the buyer was trying to one-up everyone else in terms of prestige and value... but what if there was something more at play? ๐Ÿ’ญ Like, maybe they just really loved the painting and didn't care about the previous price tag? ๐Ÿค”

Anyway, it's so great that it's finally back with its creator. I feel like this whole thing is a big reminder to appreciate art for what it is - not just for its value or status. ๐Ÿ™ The 'Not a Basquiat' might seem like an unlikely piece of art at first glance, but hey, sometimes the most unexpected things can become the most meaningful. ๐Ÿ’•
 
I'm telling you, this is so random ๐Ÿคฏ... I mean, who thought it was a good idea to put a $3.6 million painting in some hotel lobby? It's like they wanted to create an art snob's worst nightmare ๐Ÿ˜‚. On the other hand, now that it's back with Gerhard Richter, I'm kinda glad ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ... but at the same time, I wonder if he even likes having a $37 million painting hanging in his living room ๐Ÿค‘... like, can you imagine the art critics showing up to review some dude's interior design? ๐Ÿ˜‚๐ŸŽจ. Ugh, my mind is all over the place now ๐Ÿ’ญ.
 
OMG ๐Ÿคฏ - I mean, can you even believe that Gerhard Richter's painting was sitting in a hotel lobby for 15 years?! ๐Ÿ˜‚ It just goes to show how easy it is for an artwork to get lost in the crowd, especially when it doesn't quite fit with the other stuff on display. And now it's back where it belongs - I guess you could say it's finally found its purr-fect home ๐Ÿˆ.

So, what do we know about who bought that painting and why they traded it in for another piece? Was it just a case of keeping up appearances or was there something more going on? It's hard to say without knowing the buyer's motivations... but I think it's pretty interesting that people still mistake it for Basquiat! ๐Ÿ˜‚ That says a lot about how art can be misinterpreted and how valuable we place on certain works.

And what does this mean for the art world? Are we seeing a new trend where artworks are being bought and sold just to impress others, or is there something more at play here? I'm totally curious - what do you guys think is going on?! ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿค” I mean, come on, $37 million for that painting? It's like they were trying to one-up each other or something. And can you believe it was just sold from a hotel lobby? Like, who thought that was a good idea? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ The fact that people still mistake it for a Basquiat is wild tho - what's next, buying a Picasso thinking it's a Warhol print? ๐Ÿ˜‚ Anyway, at least it's back with the real artist now. ๐Ÿ‘
 
๐Ÿค” the art world is just wild man... i mean, who buys a painting that's only valued at 1 mil & then swaps it for another piece worth millions? it's like they're trying to one-up each other or something ๐Ÿค‘ anyway, glad gerhard richter's masterpiece finally got its due recognition. it's crazy how art can be so misunderstood by people ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ i mean, even the hotel staff thought basquiat was the creator lol ๐Ÿ˜‚
 
omg u can't even imagine how rich that painting was just chillin in some hotel lobby 4eva i mean $3.6 mil is crazy lol who buys a masterpiece like that for 1 mil tho? it's all about prestige & bragging rights, right? the buyer wanted to outdo everyone else with their sick art collection i guess the artist just wanted his baby back tho glad it's back with gerhard now ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” This story is crazy ๐Ÿค‘! I mean, can you imagine having Gerhard Richter's masterpiece in your lobby for 15 years and nobody even noticing? ๐Ÿ˜‚ It's like it was hiding in plain sight. And then to sell it for a record-breaking $37.1 million... that's just mind-blowing ๐Ÿ’ธ. But what really gets me is why they traded it in for another artwork, valued at just $1 million ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Was it just about prestige and one-upmanship, or was there something more to it? The art world can be so mysterious ๐Ÿ”ฎ. And poor Richard Prince's 'Not a Basquiat' ๐Ÿ˜‚ - I can see why it's become a conversation starter among guests who keep mistaking it for the real deal ๐Ÿ‘€. Anyway, I'm glad Richter's painting is back where it belongs ๐Ÿ’•.
 
๐Ÿค” just thinkin bout gerhard richter's 'domplatz, mailand' bein sold to some rich anon buyer fer $37 mil its crazy how that painting went from 3.6 mil to 37 mil in like 13 yrs lol what kinda art dealer is lookin at somethin worth 1 mil and thinkin it can get a 10x return on investment ๐Ÿค‘
 
๐Ÿคฏ "The price of an experience cannot be put into words." - E.M. Forster

I mean, can you even imagine having to deal with people mistaking a Richard Prince for a Basquiat in a hotel lobby? It's wild to think about the painting being valued so low at first and then skyrocketing to 10 times its original price. The art world is just so crazy sometimes!
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around how that painting ended up in a hotel lobby for 15 years ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, I get it, the value of art is crazy, but it's hard not to feel like some buyers are more about the prestige than actually appreciating the work itself ๐Ÿ’ธ. And can you believe people still think it's a Basquiat? ๐Ÿ˜‚ It just goes to show that art can be super confusing and subjective, even for those who supposedly know what they're talking about ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. But hey, at least Gerhard Richter's 'Domplatz, Mailand' is back where it belongs - with its creator ๐ŸŽจ๐Ÿ’•. Now let's talk about the real art of change... ๐Ÿ‘€
 
omg u no i'm lowkey obsessed with art history lol its crazy to think gerhard richter's masterpiece was chillin in a hotel lobby 4eva like who trades that kinda valuble piece 2 a random buyer? ๐Ÿค‘ and now its back w/ the artist, but what if this all just a publicity stunt or somethin? i mean, whoever bought it 1st must've had some serious taste or a crazy good business sense idk about u but i'm shook by the idea of art sales being so wild ๐Ÿคฏ๐ŸŽจ
 
Back
Top