Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Health Secretary, has unveiled the latest dietary guidelines for America, a document that is raising eyebrows among experts due to its unconventional structure and ties to industry lobbyists.
The guidelines are in a new format, often referred to as an "upside-down" food pyramid, which has been likened to a funnel. This design places a large slab of red meat at the top, followed by dairy products, whole grains, fruits, nuts, and finally, olive oil, butter, and other fats towards the bottom.
The guidelines aim to promote the consumption of "real food," but many critics argue that this approach may be misleading, as the emphasis on saturated fats could lead to increased cardiovascular risk. Moreover, the recommendations for protein intake include red meat, which has been linked to various health problems when consumed excessively.
Experts have also raised concerns about the lack of scientific backing behind some of these guidelines, such as a rollback of restrictions on alcohol consumption and a relaxation of limits on sodium intake. While Kennedy defended this approach by stating that moderate drinking can be part of a healthy lifestyle, others pointed out that "alcohol is a social lubricant that brings people together" and should not be consumed excessively.
Another contentious issue surrounding the guidelines is their close ties to industry lobbyists, including those representing the meat and dairy industries. At least four experts who contributed to the document have had ties to these industries in the past three years, sparking questions about potential conflicts of interest.
While some experts praise the guidelines for addressing highly processed foods, others are concerned that they may not be effective in reducing their consumption, given the lack of clear definitions and guidance on how to identify them.
The guidelines are in a new format, often referred to as an "upside-down" food pyramid, which has been likened to a funnel. This design places a large slab of red meat at the top, followed by dairy products, whole grains, fruits, nuts, and finally, olive oil, butter, and other fats towards the bottom.
The guidelines aim to promote the consumption of "real food," but many critics argue that this approach may be misleading, as the emphasis on saturated fats could lead to increased cardiovascular risk. Moreover, the recommendations for protein intake include red meat, which has been linked to various health problems when consumed excessively.
Experts have also raised concerns about the lack of scientific backing behind some of these guidelines, such as a rollback of restrictions on alcohol consumption and a relaxation of limits on sodium intake. While Kennedy defended this approach by stating that moderate drinking can be part of a healthy lifestyle, others pointed out that "alcohol is a social lubricant that brings people together" and should not be consumed excessively.
Another contentious issue surrounding the guidelines is their close ties to industry lobbyists, including those representing the meat and dairy industries. At least four experts who contributed to the document have had ties to these industries in the past three years, sparking questions about potential conflicts of interest.
While some experts praise the guidelines for addressing highly processed foods, others are concerned that they may not be effective in reducing their consumption, given the lack of clear definitions and guidance on how to identify them.
I'm reading this news and I gotta say, it's a real reminder that even with good intentions, things can get messy 
. It's like Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s new dietary guidelines - they're trying to promote "real food" but some of the choices are just plain weird 
. I mean, who puts red meat at the top? That's like saying the best way to start a fire is with gasoline 
.
. It's like, how can we trust someone if they're just trying to sell us something? 
I guess what I'm getting at is that sometimes you gotta question motives, even if it means disagreeing with someone on a good idea 
. What do you guys think?
this Kennedy dude is all over the place, first he's tryna push for real food but then he's got ties to meat & dairy lobbyists? like, can't we just get some actual science behind these guidelines instead of just slappin it together with big corp influence? 
and what's up with the "funnel" pyramid thing, sounds like a lazy attempt at thinkin outside the box 
but honestly who needs a food pyramid in the first place? just eat whatever and call it a day 
but seriously though i'm all about promoting whole foods over processed ones, but do we really need to eat that much red meat? 
i mean idk if its gonna be good for our hearts in the long run. and what's up with the ties to lobbyists? 
shouldnt they be focusing on science not industry interests? 
first off i thought it was gonna promote all that good stuff like fruits & veggies but NOPE it's all about the red meat & dairy products at the top 
️
and then they got all vague with olive oil & other fats at the bottom 
what kinda makes sense is a food pyramid, right? 
also, why would you put alcohol back on the table after basically banning it like 10 yrs ago? 
gotta be a huge conflict of interest. 
can we pls get some real scientists involved in this instead of just, like, friends of friends from the meat industry 
i'm more about giving people facts and data to make informed decisions, not some vague idea of 'natural' or 'wholesome'. plus, don't even get me started on the conflicts of interest 
And what about people with dietary restrictions or allergies - how will they navigate this new food pyramid? 
It's also a bit worrying that some experts are being paid off by the industries they're supposed to regulate 
.
.
Putting red meat at the top is just gonna lead to more heart attacks and whatnot 
. And don't even get me started on the lack of scientific backing behind some of these recommendations 
? And have you seen the list of industry lobbyists who contributed to this doc? 
Red flag alert! 
.
And those saturated fats at the bottom? Don't even get me started! That's the key to real food, if you ask me. As for the lack of science behind it... yeah, that's just because they didn't want to rock the boat, let's be real 
just kidding, kinda. seriously tho, i'm low-key surprised that kennedy Jr. would go with this format... like, who thought it was a good idea to put the most processed meats at the top? 
i mean, i get where he's coming from with 'real food' but gotta wonder if this is more of a marketing ploy for the meat and dairy industries... 4 experts who work for those industries?? that's some serious crony capitalism