UK Government Under Pressure to Ban Cryptocurrency Political Donations
Seven senior Labour MPs have urged the government to introduce a full ban on cryptocurrency donations in the upcoming elections bill, citing concerns over foreign interference and the potential to obscure the true source of funds.
The committee chairs โ Liam Byrne, Emily Thornberry, Tan Dhesi, Florence Eshalomi, Andy Slaughter, Chi Onwurah, and Matt Western โ have emphasized that transparency, traceability, and enforceability are essential in political finance, but cryptocurrency donations undermine all three.
"Crypto can obscure the true source of funds, enable thousands of micro donations below disclosure thresholds, and expose UK politics to foreign interference," said Liam Byrne. "Other democracies have already acted; the UK should not wait until a scandal forces our hand."
The government has been increasingly concerned about the risk posed by cryptocurrency donations to the integrity of the electoral system. However, due to the complexity of the technology involved, officials believe that introducing a ban will be unworkable by the time the elections bill is published, which includes lowering the voting age to 16 and reducing loopholes in political finance.
The proposed ban could be a significant blow to Nigel Farage's Reform UK party, which has become the first major party to accept cryptocurrency donations. The party has set up its own crypto portal to receive contributions, subjecting them to "enhanced" checks.
Campaign groups have welcomed the prospect of a ban but emphasized that it must come with clear consequences and adequate policing measures to prevent foreign interference in UK politics. As Susan Hawley, executive director of Spotlight on Corruption, noted: "Crypto donations present real risks to our democracy... We need a criminal offence that makes it harder for foreign money to get into UK politics."
The Electoral Commission has warned about the difficulties involved in tracing the true source of cryptocurrency transactions, which could leave British voters unaware of who is funding the parties they support.
Seven senior Labour MPs have urged the government to introduce a full ban on cryptocurrency donations in the upcoming elections bill, citing concerns over foreign interference and the potential to obscure the true source of funds.
The committee chairs โ Liam Byrne, Emily Thornberry, Tan Dhesi, Florence Eshalomi, Andy Slaughter, Chi Onwurah, and Matt Western โ have emphasized that transparency, traceability, and enforceability are essential in political finance, but cryptocurrency donations undermine all three.
"Crypto can obscure the true source of funds, enable thousands of micro donations below disclosure thresholds, and expose UK politics to foreign interference," said Liam Byrne. "Other democracies have already acted; the UK should not wait until a scandal forces our hand."
The government has been increasingly concerned about the risk posed by cryptocurrency donations to the integrity of the electoral system. However, due to the complexity of the technology involved, officials believe that introducing a ban will be unworkable by the time the elections bill is published, which includes lowering the voting age to 16 and reducing loopholes in political finance.
The proposed ban could be a significant blow to Nigel Farage's Reform UK party, which has become the first major party to accept cryptocurrency donations. The party has set up its own crypto portal to receive contributions, subjecting them to "enhanced" checks.
Campaign groups have welcomed the prospect of a ban but emphasized that it must come with clear consequences and adequate policing measures to prevent foreign interference in UK politics. As Susan Hawley, executive director of Spotlight on Corruption, noted: "Crypto donations present real risks to our democracy... We need a criminal offence that makes it harder for foreign money to get into UK politics."
The Electoral Commission has warned about the difficulties involved in tracing the true source of cryptocurrency transactions, which could leave British voters unaware of who is funding the parties they support.