The $500 billion beauty industry's "green" ambitions are a patchwork at best, with many companies claiming to be more sustainable than they actually are. Despite the growing demand for eco-friendly products from consumers, who are increasingly willing to pay more for sustainability (60% of consumers rate sustainability as an important purchase criterion), the industry's efforts to reduce its environmental impact have been inconsistent and inadequate.
The industry's plastic packaging is a major sustainability challenge, with 95% of it being thrown away and only 9% of global plastic waste being recycled. Many brands are trying to phase out single-use plastics and adopt post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic, but the supply chain issues and high cost of PCR plastic make it difficult for them to achieve their targets.
The beauty industry also lacks standardization when it comes to sustainability claims, with many companies using misleading marketing language such as "clean beauty" or "natural." The lack of transparency around product ingredients makes it difficult for consumers to make informed choices about the products they buy.
Governments and multinationals enforcing regulations and setting a baseline for brands to operate from would help to drive change. However, the industry's reliance on market leadership means that companies will need to take bold action to address their climate shortcomings.
The issue is further complicated by inconsistencies in recycling laws across countries, with some countries having stricter laws than others. This can make it difficult for consumers to find safer, greener products, especially if they are purchasing online or across borders.
In the US, for example, the European Union's standard for sunscreen ingredients is higher than that of the FDA, but only 35% of products meet the EU standard compared to 94% that pass the US standard. The lack of consistent regulations can lead to a situation where companies are able to avoid making meaningful changes by simply following a different set of rules.
Ultimately, it will take continued collective advocacy and initiative from brands, customers, and governments to drive meaningful change in the beauty industry's sustainability practices.
The industry's plastic packaging is a major sustainability challenge, with 95% of it being thrown away and only 9% of global plastic waste being recycled. Many brands are trying to phase out single-use plastics and adopt post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic, but the supply chain issues and high cost of PCR plastic make it difficult for them to achieve their targets.
The beauty industry also lacks standardization when it comes to sustainability claims, with many companies using misleading marketing language such as "clean beauty" or "natural." The lack of transparency around product ingredients makes it difficult for consumers to make informed choices about the products they buy.
Governments and multinationals enforcing regulations and setting a baseline for brands to operate from would help to drive change. However, the industry's reliance on market leadership means that companies will need to take bold action to address their climate shortcomings.
The issue is further complicated by inconsistencies in recycling laws across countries, with some countries having stricter laws than others. This can make it difficult for consumers to find safer, greener products, especially if they are purchasing online or across borders.
In the US, for example, the European Union's standard for sunscreen ingredients is higher than that of the FDA, but only 35% of products meet the EU standard compared to 94% that pass the US standard. The lack of consistent regulations can lead to a situation where companies are able to avoid making meaningful changes by simply following a different set of rules.
Ultimately, it will take continued collective advocacy and initiative from brands, customers, and governments to drive meaningful change in the beauty industry's sustainability practices.