The world's $500 billion beauty industry has set ambitious "green" goals, but many experts say they are falling short of making a recognizable impact in the absence of collective goal-setting, global strategy, and standardized regulations.
A recent report by Simon Kucher found that 60% of consumers worldwide rate sustainability as an important purchase criterion, with 35% willing to pay more for sustainable products or services. This shift in consumer preferences has prompted many beauty brands to set environmental goals, such as moving away from single-use plastics and providing recyclable packaging.
However, consumers still struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of many products due to inconsistent industry efforts and a lack of transparency around product ingredients. The British Beauty Council notes that companies often use marketing language like "clean beauty" to make their products seem natural or sustainable when they may not actually be.
To address this issue, some brands are trying to phase out harmful plastics from their operations and adopt post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic. However, PCR plastic is expensive and difficult to source, with only 9% of global plastic waste being recycled globally, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The beauty industry also faces criticism for not doing enough to address the waste and pollution generated throughout supply chains, manufacturing, and shipping. Many experts argue that governments and multinationals need to enforce regulations and set a baseline for brands to operate from when making sustainability claims.
However, market leaders in the beauty industry are taking steps towards sustainability, such as Sephora's "Clean + Planet Positive" initiative and Target's "Target Zero" program. The effectiveness of these efforts will depend on continued collective advocacy and initiative to address the industry's climate shortcomings.
Ultimately, the key to meaningful change in the beauty industry lies with market leadership, which is likely to be the most impactful vector for addressing the industry's climate shortcomings in the absence of bold regulations or global standards on sustainability practices.
A recent report by Simon Kucher found that 60% of consumers worldwide rate sustainability as an important purchase criterion, with 35% willing to pay more for sustainable products or services. This shift in consumer preferences has prompted many beauty brands to set environmental goals, such as moving away from single-use plastics and providing recyclable packaging.
However, consumers still struggle to understand the sustainability credentials of many products due to inconsistent industry efforts and a lack of transparency around product ingredients. The British Beauty Council notes that companies often use marketing language like "clean beauty" to make their products seem natural or sustainable when they may not actually be.
To address this issue, some brands are trying to phase out harmful plastics from their operations and adopt post-consumer recycled (PCR) plastic. However, PCR plastic is expensive and difficult to source, with only 9% of global plastic waste being recycled globally, according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
The beauty industry also faces criticism for not doing enough to address the waste and pollution generated throughout supply chains, manufacturing, and shipping. Many experts argue that governments and multinationals need to enforce regulations and set a baseline for brands to operate from when making sustainability claims.
However, market leaders in the beauty industry are taking steps towards sustainability, such as Sephora's "Clean + Planet Positive" initiative and Target's "Target Zero" program. The effectiveness of these efforts will depend on continued collective advocacy and initiative to address the industry's climate shortcomings.
Ultimately, the key to meaningful change in the beauty industry lies with market leadership, which is likely to be the most impactful vector for addressing the industry's climate shortcomings in the absence of bold regulations or global standards on sustainability practices.
like, i totally get why brands wanna make a green effort, but at the same time, it feels like they're just greenwashing... 
idk if 60% of consumers actually care that much about sustainability in their beauty faves. and yeah, marketing language is super misleading - "clean beauty" sounds all natural, but what does that even mean? 
i think the industry's just trying to save face and not get called out for its eco-inefficiencies. and honestly, 9% of global plastic waste being recycled is kinda wild... shouldnt that be like, super easy to improve on by now? 
maybe market leaders are trying, but it feels like a drop in the bucket compared to what's needed. i guess only time will tell if these initiatives really add up to something meaningful 
! we need more transparency and accountability from beauty brands, you know? it's not enough to just say your products are "sustainable" - we need to see the actual changes they're making behind the scenes 
. let's support those brands that are taking real action towards reducing waste and pollution 
! and btw, 60% of consumers caring about sustainability is like, amazing news 
! more people care than we think, and with market leadership driving change, I'm hoping for big things 
.
. Sephora's Clean + Planet Positive initiative and Target's Target Zero program are great examples of how brands can drive positive change in the industry 
. However, without more regulation and standardization, it'll be tough to know whether those efforts are making a real impact 
.
. The 9% global plastic waste recycling rate is mind-boggling 
. We can't just rely on individual companies to make a difference – we need systemic change 
.
, I'm so tired of these "green" companies just slapping a label on their packaging and calling it a day 
. And don't even get me started on the PCR plastic - that stuff is like unicorn tears 
. It's just not feasible for everyone to switch over.
.
]
]
]
]
... but let's be real, how many people actually know what's in their fave skincare products? 
. i mean, i love a good glass bottle as much as the next person, but if it's just gonna end up in the ocean anyway, what's the point? 
we need more transparency and regulation, not just companies trying to virtue signal 
. those market leaders trying to make a change but its all about the profit margins, when will they really put their money where their mouth is? 
. I mean, 60% of people care about sustainability when shopping, which is cool, but what exactly does that mean for me? Do I really want to pay more for a face cream if it's just going to be packaged in recyclable stuff?
. Sephora and Target are doing some cool initiatives, like reducing waste and using post-consumer recycled plastic. But it's still not enough, right? The industry needs to step up and make some real changes if they want to be seen as green and responsible.
️.
. But hey, at least some market leaders are taking the initiative, and that's gotta count for something 
. I mean, come on guys, if you're gonna claim that your product is eco-friendly, at least be transparent about what's in it! Consumers deserve to know what they're getting themselves into.
