"In Indonesia, a couple has been caned 140 times each for having sex outside marriage and drinking alcohol in a shocking case that is likely to be one of the most severe punishments under Sharia law.
The pair, who have not been named, were publicly flogged with a rattan stick in a park in Banda Aceh, the only province in Indonesia where Islamic law applies. According to eyewitnesses, dozens of people watched as they received their punishment.
Sexual relations between unmarried couples are strictly forbidden under Sharia law in Aceh, and so is drinking alcohol. The couple was hit with 100 lashes for having sex outside marriage and another 40 for consuming alcohol, according to the head of Banda Aceh's Sharia police, Muhammad Rizal.
The woman suffered from her punishment and had to be taken to an ambulance, highlighting the extreme nature of the punishment. It is believed to be one of the highest numbers of cane lashes imposed since Sharia was implemented in 2001.
Caning remains a popular form of punishment under Islamic law in Aceh, with offenses including gambling, drinking alcohol, having gay sex, and having sex outside marriage. Men who miss Friday prayers are also subject to the punishment.
In recent years, several people have been publicly flogged for breaking these laws, including two men last year who were caned 76 times each for having sex in a public bathroom."
The article highlights the harsh punishments that still exist under Sharia law in Indonesia's Aceh province, where Islamic codes are strictly enforced. The severe punishment imposed on the couple serves as a reminder of the strict laws and customs that govern the region.
It's worth noting that while caning is still practiced in some parts of Indonesia, there is no national law against homosexual relations, and under the autonomy granted to Banda Aceh in 2001, the federal government cannot intervene in the province's Sharia law enforcement. This has led to human rights concerns and criticism from international organizations.
The case highlights the need for greater understanding and tolerance towards different cultures and laws, as well as the importance of protecting human rights and dignity, especially in situations where harsh punishments are imposed on individuals who break the law.
The pair, who have not been named, were publicly flogged with a rattan stick in a park in Banda Aceh, the only province in Indonesia where Islamic law applies. According to eyewitnesses, dozens of people watched as they received their punishment.
Sexual relations between unmarried couples are strictly forbidden under Sharia law in Aceh, and so is drinking alcohol. The couple was hit with 100 lashes for having sex outside marriage and another 40 for consuming alcohol, according to the head of Banda Aceh's Sharia police, Muhammad Rizal.
The woman suffered from her punishment and had to be taken to an ambulance, highlighting the extreme nature of the punishment. It is believed to be one of the highest numbers of cane lashes imposed since Sharia was implemented in 2001.
Caning remains a popular form of punishment under Islamic law in Aceh, with offenses including gambling, drinking alcohol, having gay sex, and having sex outside marriage. Men who miss Friday prayers are also subject to the punishment.
In recent years, several people have been publicly flogged for breaking these laws, including two men last year who were caned 76 times each for having sex in a public bathroom."
The article highlights the harsh punishments that still exist under Sharia law in Indonesia's Aceh province, where Islamic codes are strictly enforced. The severe punishment imposed on the couple serves as a reminder of the strict laws and customs that govern the region.
It's worth noting that while caning is still practiced in some parts of Indonesia, there is no national law against homosexual relations, and under the autonomy granted to Banda Aceh in 2001, the federal government cannot intervene in the province's Sharia law enforcement. This has led to human rights concerns and criticism from international organizations.
The case highlights the need for greater understanding and tolerance towards different cultures and laws, as well as the importance of protecting human rights and dignity, especially in situations where harsh punishments are imposed on individuals who break the law.