'The powerful have their power. We have the capacity to stop pretending': the Canadian PM's call to action at Davos | Mark Carney

Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney has issued a stark warning to the world, urging middle powers like himself to take a stand against the erosion of international order. He believes that the old rules-based system is no longer tenable and that countries must adapt by building their own strength at home.

Carney argues that the current era of great-power rivalry is characterized by economic integration being used as a tool for coercion. This, he claims, is a form of "living within a lie," where countries pretend to be part of a system that no longer exists. He suggests that this fiction has been useful in the past, but it's no longer sustainable.

To address this challenge, Carney proposes that middle powers like Canada engage in variable geometry – forming different coalitions for different issues based on common values and interests. This approach would allow countries to combine their strength to create a more significant impact.

Carney also emphasizes the importance of building institutions and agreements that function as described. He suggests that this includes creating shared standards, reducing fragmentation, and promoting complementarities. By doing so, middle powers can reduce their vulnerability to retaliation and earn the right to principled stands.

One of the key aspects of Carney's strategy is diversifying internationally. This involves forming alliances with like-minded countries, negotiating free-trade pacts, and pursuing variable geometry. Canada has already taken steps in this direction, concluding strategic partnerships with China, Qatar, India, Asean, Thailand, the Philippines, and Mercosur.

Carney believes that middle powers have a crucial role to play in shaping the new world order. By taking a stand against economic intimidation and promoting cooperation, they can create a more just and sustainable future. He argues that this is not about competing with great powers but rather combining their strength to achieve common goals.

In summary, Carney's call to action is for middle powers like Canada to stop pretending that the old rules-based system still functions and instead build their own strength at home. By diversifying internationally, building institutions, and promoting cooperation, they can create a more significant impact and shape the future of international relations.

Carney's message is clear: the powerful have their power, but middle powers like Canada have something else – the capacity to stop pretending and name reality. They must act with honesty, consistency, and pragmatism to build a better world for all.
 
I think this whole thing about old rules-based systems just being whack lol πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ I mean, come on, we've been living in a fantasy world where countries just get along for centuries. It's time to wake up and realize that the strong will do what they want anyway 😊 Canada needs to stop pretending like they're all buddy-buddy with everyone and start building their own thing. Like, diversifying internationally and forming alliances with other like-minded countries makes total sense 🀝 They need to be realistic about where they stand in the world and not get left behind just because of some outdated notion that everyone's gonna get along forever πŸ’”
 
im so down with carney's vibe 🀝 he's right on point about middle powers taking control of their own destiny and not relying on outdated rules-based systems. it's time for us to stop pretending that we're part of the game when in reality, we're just trying to survive πŸ’―. building our own strength at home is key, whether it's through forming new alliances, negotiating free-trade pacts, or promoting cooperation with like-minded countries. and let's be real, canada's already been taking steps in this direction πŸ™Œ. but what really gets me is the idea of middle powers combining their strength to create a more significant impact. it's time for us to stop playing nice and start making some noise 😊. we may not have the same level of power as the great powers, but we've got something they don't: our ability to adapt and evolve 🌟. so yeah, carney's message is clear: let's stop pretending and start building a better world for all πŸ‘
 
omg u no canada's PM mark carney just dropped this fire warning lol he's saying that the old rules-based system is done 4 real & we gotta start building our own strength @ home 🀯 like, i feel him on this one tho - it's crazy how great powers r using economic integration as a tool 2 coerce other countries πŸ€‘ anyway, carney's suggestion of forming diff coalitions based on common values & interests is low-key genius πŸ€“ we need more of that kinda thinking rn πŸ’‘
 
idk why ppl r still stuck on the old rules-based system πŸ€” canada's prime minster mark carney is spot on in saying that middle powers need 2 take a stand against the erosion of int'l order 🌎 he's right, economic integration shouldnt b used as a tool 4 coercion 🚫 it's time 4 countries 2 adapt & build their own strength at home πŸ’ͺ variable geometry is da way 2 go πŸ”„ forming diff coalitions 4 diff issues based on common values & interests is key πŸ”“ middle powers can't just sit back & watch the powerful do everythin' πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ they need 2 take action, build institutions, & promote cooperation πŸ‘Š canada's already takin steps in this direction, it's time 4 other middle powers 2 follow suit πŸ’ͺ
 
i think carney's got a point πŸ€”. as someone who's been following international news, it feels like the 'rules-based system' is kinda... broken πŸ˜’. countries are more focused on their own interests than working together towards a common goal. it's like we're all just trying to survive in this great-power rivalry πŸš€.

i think carney's idea of forming different coalitions based on shared values and interests is a good starting point πŸ’‘. if middle powers can come together and support each other, they might be able to create some real change πŸ”„. it's not about competing with the big players, but about working together to achieve something better for everyone 🌎.

and i gotta say, canada's already taken some great steps in diversifying its international relationships 🀝. forming strategic partnerships with china and india is just the beginning πŸ‘. if more middle powers can do the same, maybe we'll start seeing some real progress towards a more just and sustainable world 🌈.
 
You know what's crazy about this whole international order thing? Have you ever tried to get good pizza delivery in different cities? Like, it's always an adventure πŸ•πŸ˜‚. I was in Toronto the other day and got this amazing slice from that new place downtown. But when I asked them if they delivered, they said "no" but then a minute later sent me a text saying they'd be there in 30 mins. It's like, what even is that? Can't they just make up their minds? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ Anyway, back to Canada and the middle powers... Carney makes a point about building strength at home, but I think we're all gonna end up living in a world where our favorite takeout places start delivering from random countries 🌍.
 
The old rules-based system is definitely looking fragile πŸ€”. I mean, think about it, countries are basically playing pretend that everything's cool when in reality, economic integration is just being used as a tool of coercion πŸ˜’. It's like we're living in a fantasy world where everyone agrees to play by the same rules, but in reality, everyone's just trying to get ahead πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈ.

I like Carney's idea of variable geometry – forming different coalitions for different issues based on common values and interests 🀝. It makes sense that middle powers should take a stand against economic intimidation and promote cooperation instead of competing with great powers πŸ’ͺ.

But, I'm not sure if diversifying internationally is the answer to everything 🌎. What about the potential risks of forming alliances with countries like China? Are we just playing into their hands or can we use these relationships to our advantage? πŸ€”

I think what Carney's saying is that middle powers have a crucial role to play in shaping the new world order, but it's not going to be easy πŸ’ͺ. We need to be honest with ourselves and each other about where we stand and how we can work together to create a more just and sustainable future 🌟.
 
I don’t usually comment but I think this is super relevant right now πŸ€”. The old rules-based system is already feeling pretty fragile, you know? It's like we're trying to hold on to something that's been propped up by history and tradition, but it's just not sustainable anymore. As someone who's always been interested in global politics, I think Carney has some solid points about middle powers needing to take a stand.

But at the same time, I'm a bit skeptical about variable geometry being the silver bullet solution πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. It sounds like it could be super effective, but how do you actually make that work in practice? Do countries have the bandwidth and resources to juggle all these different coalitions and agreements? And what if one country doesn't show up to the party? I don't know, maybe Carney has a plan for that too... πŸ€”. Anyway, it's definitely something to think about πŸ’‘
 
im not sure i agree with this new approach from Carney tho πŸ€”... isnt it just gonna create more fragmented systems where everyone's just looking out for themselves? like what about cooperation on major issues? doesnt that kinda get lost in variable geometry πŸ“ˆ i mean, im all for canada building its own strength and all but i think we need to be careful not to abandon the old rules-based system entirely... whats wrong with working together on a global scale when it comes to things like climate change and economic inequality? πŸŒŽπŸ’Έ
 
omg u no wntin 2 b real πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ canada's PM mark carney iz sayin that middle powers r gettin left behind cuz of great power rivalry 🀯 like, they cant just keep pretendin dat the old rules-based system still works, cuz it dont, fam πŸ˜‚. he thinks middle powers shud b formin their own coalitions 4 different issues based on common values & interests πŸ‘₯. and its not jus about forming alliances 2, its also bout creatin shared stds, reducin fragmentation, & promisin complementarities 🀝. canada's already tokin steps in dis direction, btw! πŸ™Œ
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure about this "variable geometry" approach πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. As a parent, I worry that if countries start forming different coalitions for different issues, it'll just lead to more confusion and less cooperation in the long run 😬. And what's with all the free-trade pacts? Won't that just create more inequality and make it harder for smaller countries to compete? πŸ“‰ As a parent, I want my kids to grow up in a world where everyone has access to opportunities and can thrive without being left behind 🌟.
 
I'm telling ya, it's like they're saying we gotta get outta this old system πŸ€”. I mean, Mark Carney is right, economic integration can be used as a tool for coercion, that's just not cool πŸ˜’. It's like when you're playing a game and someone's cheating, you gotta call 'em out on it! But seriously, forming different coalitions based on common values and interests makes sense 🀝.

I think the key is to build our own strength at home before we try to shape the world 🏠. It's like I always say, "You can't fix what you don't recognize" πŸ•°οΈ. We gotta stop pretending that the old rules-based system still works and start taking control of our own destiny πŸ’ͺ.

And let's be real, diversifying internationally is the way to go 🌎. Forming alliances with like-minded countries and pursuing free-trade pacts can really make a difference πŸ”’. It's not about competing with the great powers, it's about working together towards common goals πŸ‘«.

I'm all for building institutions and agreements that function as described πŸ’Ό. It's time for middle powers to take a stand against economic intimidation and promote cooperation 🌟. We gotta create a more just and sustainable future for everyone 🌎.
 
Another politician trying to sound wise πŸ€”. I mean, how original is it to say we need to adapt and build our own strength at home? It's like he took every 'expert' opinion from the past decade and mashed them into one speech 😴. And what's with this "living within a lie" nonsense? Like, who hasn't heard that phrase before? πŸ™„

And don't even get me started on his plan for variable geometry. Sounds like just another fancy term for forming alliances to counterbalance the great powers πŸ’β€β™‚οΈ. I mean, what's wrong with good old-fashioned diplomacy? Do we really need all these new-fangled strategies to deal with the likes of China and Russia? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

And let's not forget his emphasis on building institutions and agreements that function as described. Like, is he seriously suggesting that governments can just agree on everything without any conflicts or disagreements? πŸ™„ That's never happened before, right? πŸ˜‚
 
I've been thinking about this statement by Mark Carney and I gotta say πŸ€”. It's kinda true that we're living in a time where economic integration is being used as a tool for coercion. But can we really just abandon the rules-based system? It might sound good to take matters into our own hands, but what if it leads to chaos instead? πŸ’₯

I mean, think about all the agreements and institutions we've built over the years – they're not perfect, but they give us a sense of stability. By building our own strength at home, are we just creating a fragmented world where no one's really accountable? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

Carney's idea of variable geometry is interesting, though. Maybe we should be forming coalitions and alliances with like-minded countries instead of trying to go it alone. That way, we can pool our resources and make a real impact. πŸ’ͺ But it's not as simple as just saying "let's do something new" – there are a lot of complexities involved.

One thing that bugs me is when Carney says middle powers have the power to "stop pretending" and name reality. Is he really saying that we're just pretending to be part of a system that doesn't exist? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I think it's more nuanced than that. We need to have an honest conversation about what's working and what's not, but we also need to consider the consequences of our actions.
 
I gotta say, this whole "old rules-based system" thing is a bit overhyped in my opinion πŸ˜’. I mean, don't get me wrong, the current state of global politics is messy and all that jazz 🀯. But thinking we need to totally dismantle it because countries are using economic integration as a tool for coercion? That's just blaming everyone for being bad at diplomacy πŸ‘€.

What if instead of trying to create some new system from scratch, we're just playing whack-a-mole with the current one? We're patching up holes here and there, but ultimately, we're still playing by the same rules πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. I think it's time to focus on building our own strength at home rather than trying to reinvent the wheel πŸ”§.

And what about all these new coalitions and alliances? It sounds like a lot of wishy-washy diplomacy to me πŸ™„. Can we just pick one side or another instead of jumping around like a musical chair?
 
πŸ€” I think Carney's warning is spot on... we've been living in a bubble for too long, thinking that just because we're part of some system or alliance, everything will magically work out. But the truth is, the old rules-based system is crumbling and it's time to face reality.

What I love about Carney's idea of variable geometry is that it acknowledges that countries have different interests and values at play. Instead of trying to fit into a one-size-fits-all system, we should be forming coalitions based on what works best for each country. It's not about competing with the big powers, but about finding ways to collaborate and achieve common goals.

I'm also intrigued by Carney's emphasis on building institutions and agreements that function as described. This means creating shared standards and reducing fragmentation – it's time to stop playing games and start working together. And let's be real, diversifying internationally is a no-brainer... who doesn't want to form alliances with like-minded countries and negotiate free-trade pacts?

But what really gets me is Carney's message about middle powers having the power to shape the future of international relations. We don't have to be intimidated by the big powers – we can use our capacity for honesty, consistency, and pragmatism to build a better world for all. It's time to stop pretending and start taking ownership of our own strength... πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm thinking about this speech by Mark Carney... it's kinda weird how he's saying that the old system is toast 🀯. I mean, we're still living under the same rules-based system that was in place back when he was at the Bank of England, right? It's all good if you ask me. The idea of middle powers forming their own coalitions and alliances sounds like a solid plan to me πŸ’‘. We should be building our own strength at home instead of trying to adapt to this "living within a lie" thing πŸ™„. I'm not sure about his emphasis on creating shared standards and reducing fragmentation, but hey, more cooperation never hurt anyone 🀝. Canada's already making moves with their strategic partnerships, so maybe this is the way forward for them? It's all about acting honestly and consistently, eh? πŸ‘
 
Back
Top